The Effect of Straining Techniques on Women and Newborn

NCT ID: NCT05578794

Last Updated: 2022-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

354 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-24

Study Completion Date

2021-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: To examine the effects of straining techniques on the duration of labor, perineal trauma status and newborn apgar score.

Method: This study is a randomized controlled trial. The straining techniques were explained to the pregnant women who gave written consent to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to groups in the latent phase (natural, spontaneous, Valsalva), and the techniques were applied in the second phase of labor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: The present study was planned to determine the effects of straining techniques on the duration of labor, perineal trauma status, and newborn Apgar score.

Method: The study, which had a randomized-controlled experimental design, was conducted in Sivas Numune Hospital Birth Unit. The sampling size was calculated using power analysis. In the literature, spontaneous straining is used by pregnant women in the range of 25-81%, and Valsalva -type straining has a rate of 32-75%. To represent the population of the study, sample volume was determined at =0.05 significance level, 1- =0.95 Confidence Interval, =0.20 error risk, and 1- =0.80 power, and the total number of individuals was determined as 354. The data of the study were collected with the "Pre-Evaluation Form", "Personal Information Form", "Labor Evaluation Form", and "Apgar Score" created by the researchers in line with the literature data. The straining techniques were explained to the pregnant women who gave written consent to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to groups in the latent phase (natural, spontaneous, Valsalva), and the techniques were applied in the second phase of labor. ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis H-test, Chi-square test, Exact test, Tamhane T2 test, and Dunn Test were used to evaluate the data obtained in the study. Statistical significance was evaluated at a 0.05 significance level and the SPSS version 23.0 was used.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prolonged Second Stage of Labor Other Specified Trauma to Perineum and Vulva During Delivery Newborn; Vitality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Valsalva-type Straining (Group I), Spontaneous Straining (Group II), Natural Straining (Group III))
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Valsalva Straining (Control Group)

The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Valsalva straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Straining types

Intervention Type OTHER

Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Spontaneous Straining

The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Spontaneous straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Straining types

Intervention Type OTHER

Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Natural Straining

The straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Straining types

Intervention Type OTHER

Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Straining types

Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 38-42. being at the gestational week,
* Having a singleton pregnancy
* Fetus in vertex position
* Being in the latent phase in the first stage of labor
* Planning and having a normal vaginal birth,
* Not having a diagnosed chronic physical disease,
* Not having a diagnosed psychiatric disease,
* No risk of risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly,
* Being literate,
* No communication problem
* Giving birth in the lithotomy position
* Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* 38-42. not in the week of pregnancy,
* Having multiple pregnancy
* Fetus out of vertex position
* Being in the latent phase in the first stage of birth,
* Having a cesarean section while planning a normal vaginal delivery,
* Having a diagnosed chronic physical illness,
* Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
* Having a risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly risk,
* illiteracy,
* Having a communication problem
* Giving birth in different positions
* Not willing to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

41 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cumhuriyet University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ozlem Akgün

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gulbahtiyar Demirel

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cumhuriyet University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sivas sample hospital

Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102843

Is directed open-glottis pushing more effective than directed closed-glottis pushing during the second stage of labor? A pragmatic randomized trial-the EOLE study.

http://www.sjmms.net/text.asp?2014/2/2/101/137000

The impact of valsalva's versus spontaneous pushing techniques during second stage of labor on postpartum maternal fatigue and neonatal outcome.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OAkgun

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Labor
NCT06792357 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA