Trial Outcomes & Findings for Student Behavior in School Accident Precautions (NCT NCT05576987)

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Results Overview

Students' behaviors regarding safety measures in school accidents were measured through a scale. A total score was obtained based on students' responses to the scale. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the obtained scores. The information related to the scale is provided below. Scale of Behavior Towards The Security Precautions Against School Accidents: Student behaviors will be determined with this scale. It is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of 40 items and was developed by Gür and Yıldız (2009). The scale allows for a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 200. The highest score obtained from the scale indicates that the student has taken safety measures for school accidents at the highest level.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

The scale was applied once at the beginning of the study and again at the end of the study (4th week).

Results posted on

2026-01-08

Participant Flow

The study was carried out in a primary school. The study began with 100 students in each group. 3 branches were selected for the experimental group and 3 branches for the control group. Branches were determined by lottery. The students to be included in the experimental group were selected from 3 branches. The students to be included in the control group were also selected from the other 3 branches.

Unit of analysis: School Branches

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure	Intervention Group Experimental group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches will be selected for the experimental group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. Education: Students selected for the experimental group will be trained by the researcher for school accidents prepared in line with the components of the Health Belief Model.The training program will be planned as 30 minutes per week for 4 weeks. Before the training and at the end of the training (at the end of the 4th week), the students will be applied personal information form and a behavior scale for safety precautions in school accidents.	Control Group Control group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches for the control group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. After the training of the experimental group is completed and the final data are obtained, a 40-minute training will be given to the control group about prevention from school accidents. This training was planned so that the control group would not be devoided of the intervention.
Overall Study STARTED	100 3	100 3
Overall Study COMPLETED	90 3	92 3
Overall Study NOT COMPLETED	10 0	8 0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure	Intervention Group n=90 Participants Experimental group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches will be selected for the experimental group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. Education: Students selected for the experimental group will be trained by the researcher for school accidents prepared in line with the components of the Health Belief Model.The training program will be planned as 30 minutes per week for 4 weeks. Before the training and at the end of the training (at the end of the 4th week), the students will be applied personal information form and a behavior scale for safety precautions in school accidents.	Control Group n=92 Participants Control group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches for the control group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. After the training of the experimental group is completed and the final data are obtained, a 40-minute training will be given to the control group about prevention from school accidents. This training was planned so that the control group would not be devoided of the intervention.	Total n=182 Participants Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical <=18 years	90 Participants n=90 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	92 Participants n=92 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	182 Participants n=182 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.
Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years	0 Participants n=90 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	0 Participants n=92 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	0 Participants n=182 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.
Age, Categorical >=65 years	0 Participants n=90 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	0 Participants n=92 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.	0 Participants n=182 Participants • 10 students in the intervention Group group and 7 students in the control group left the study voluntarily. For this reason, data of 90 students in the intervention Groupgroup and 92 students in the control group were analyzed.
Age, Continuous	9.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64 • n=90 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	9.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=92 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	9.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.72 • n=182 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group
Sex: Female, Male Female	41 Participants n=90 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	44 Participants n=92 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	85 Participants n=182 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group
Sex: Female, Male Male	49 Participants n=90 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	48 Participants n=92 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	97 Participants n=182 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected	—	—	0 Participants Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment Turkey	90 Participants n=90 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	92 Participants n=92 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group	182 Participants n=182 Participants • Due to absenteeism during various weeks of the training sessions, 10 students who did not complete the training were excluded from the study. Data from 90 students who attended all sessions over four consecutive weeks were included in the analysis. In the control group, 8 students did not complete the second assessment following the initial scale administration and were therefore excluded. The study was completed with 92 participants in the control group

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The scale was applied once at the beginning of the study and again at the end of the study (4th week).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Control Group n=92 Participants Control group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches for the control group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. The students in these branches will constitute the study sample. After the training of the experimental group is completed and the final data are obtained, a 40-minute training will be given to the control group about prevention from school accidents. This training was planned so that the control group would not be devoided of the intervention.	Intervention Group n=90 Participants Experimental group will be selected from the branches 3rd and 4th grade. 3 branches will be selected for the experimental group. Branches will be determined by drawing. In order not to interfere with the education of students during the training, the groups will be designated as class branches. The students in these branches will constitute the study sample. Education: Students selected for the experimental group will be trained by the researcher for school accidents prepared in line with the components of the Health Belief Model.The training program will be planned as 30 minutes per week for 4 weeks. Before the training and at the end of the training (at the end of the 4th week), the students will be applied personal information form and a behavior scale for safety precautions in school accidents.
Behavior Towards The Security Precautions Against School Accidents pretest	134.46 Scale score Standard Deviation 15.70	131.66 Scale score Standard Deviation 17.50
Behavior Towards The Security Precautions Against School Accidents posttest	136.68 Scale score Standard Deviation 17.05	132.73 Scale score Standard Deviation 18.97

Adverse Events

Intervention Group

Serious events: 0 serious events

Other events: 0 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events

Other events: 0 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Cahide ÇEVİK

Afyonkarahisar Health Science University

Phone: +90 505 518 92 44

Email: [email protected]

Results disclosure agreements

Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
Publication restrictions are in place