Ligament Reconstruction in an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol

NCT ID: NCT05571241

Last Updated: 2022-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators have found that their patients who get earlier rehabilitation following ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) surgery with interference screws have experienced better outcomes. The investigators hypothesis is that when formally comparing these patients who are exposed to the rehabilitation protocol earlier compared to later, the investigators will see statistically better outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a significant cause of hand pain, dysfunction, disability, and visible deformity. Surgery in the form of ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI)is often indicated when less invasive procedures fail. Following LRTI procedures, the accepted classic protocol throughout the literature has been to place patients in a thumb-immobilizing spica cast or splint for 4-6 weeks and then begin rehabilitation exercises. Following this, a gradual progressive rehabilitation protocol is initiated which usually focuses on thumb range of motion, pinch strength, and hand function. This standard form of rehabilitation has shown improvements in pain, function, and satisfaction. However, because these patients are usually kept immobilized until 4-6 weeks post-operatively in order for the tendon graft to incorporate and become stable, stiffness can develop in the thumb as a result. This leads to more time off work and without full and unrestricted use of the hand. Due to their higher pullout strength compared to conventional tendon fixation, the use of interference screws in LRTI procedures may allow for earlier initiation of a more accelerated rehabilitation protocol compared to the standard 4-6 weeks of immobilization prior to rehabilitation. Over the past year at the investigators center the investigators have begun post-operative mobilization and rehabilitation on the first post-op visit at 10-14 days following LRTI with the use of an interference screw. Anecdotally, the investigators have found that their patients have regained their range of motion and function earlier and, in some cases, with larger gains compared to their previous patients they had immobilized for 6 weeks before initiating their rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to compare patients that have been exposed to the early versus standard rehabilitation protocol to see if there is significant improvement in their range of motion, pinch and grip strength, pain levels and function.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

fast rehabilitation program

conventional rehabilitation

Fast rehabilitation program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

1-2 weeks (first post-op visit): Long thumb spica splint removed; Staples/stitches removed; Short hand-based thumb spica fitted for the patient Start Active Range of Motion Exercises (AROM) for thumb Add active assisted rang of motion exercises (AAROM) if no significant progress 6 weeks: Gradually wean off of splint during the day; wear for protection and/or more strenuous daily activities 6-8 weeks: Passive Range of Motion Exercises (PROM) (ie. stretching), if needed - (ie. No significant changes in ROM of thumb) 8-10 weeks: Resisted exercises/activities without splint on

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fast rehabilitation program

1-2 weeks (first post-op visit): Long thumb spica splint removed; Staples/stitches removed; Short hand-based thumb spica fitted for the patient Start Active Range of Motion Exercises (AROM) for thumb Add active assisted rang of motion exercises (AAROM) if no significant progress 6 weeks: Gradually wean off of splint during the day; wear for protection and/or more strenuous daily activities 6-8 weeks: Passive Range of Motion Exercises (PROM) (ie. stretching), if needed - (ie. No significant changes in ROM of thumb) 8-10 weeks: Resisted exercises/activities without splint on

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinical and radiographic diagnosis of 1st CMC OA
* failed to improve with conservative modalities
* continued pain over the first CMC joint
* loss of strength or motion of the thumb that limits activities of daily living

Exclusion Criteria

* rheumatoid arthritis
* gout
* cervical radiculopathy
* previous thumb/1st CMC surgery
* post-traumatic arthritis of 1st CMC
* carpal tunnel syndrome with motor function impairment
* patients with post-traumatic arthritis of their 1st CMC AND have dislocation of this joint.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dr. David Pichora

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. David Pichora

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Pichora, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen's University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hotel Dieu Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SURG-288-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.