Options for Pain Management Using Nonpharmacological Strategies

NCT ID: NCT05563792

Last Updated: 2025-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

296 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to help Veterans learn about different ways they can manage chronic pain that do not involve medications. Veterans will work with a coach to explore the Veterans' values and goals and how different non-medication approaches may fit into these values and goals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) for chronic pain are safe, effective, and widely available in VA. In response to the widespread harms associated with opioids and high-quality evidence supporting NPTs for chronic pain the Centers for Disease Control, American College of Physicians, Department of Defense, and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) released guidelines or adopted policies to move away from opioids toward multimodal approaches that prioritize evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments (NPTs) NPTs include both traditional (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise/movement) and complementary/integrative health (CIH) (e.g., acupuncture, yoga) approaches. VA has been a leader in expanding access to these approaches, and in 2016 the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act mandated that VA expand availability of CIH therapies. A survey published in 2021 revealed that this expansion has been successful. VA medical centers offered an average of 5 CIH approaches, with 63 sites offering at least 10. Expansion of CIH therapies has also been one of three key components of VA's Whole Health Initiative, implemented by VA's Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation (one of the investigators' operational partners). In addition, as a result of implementation in 2012, cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain is available at 92% of VAs. Consequently, NPTs are widely available across VA.

Despite these efforts, pain remains a significant problem among Veterans. In 2017, 66% of Veterans reported pain, with 9% reporting severe pain. Compared to non-Veterans, Veterans had 1.5 times the odds of having severe pain, and Veterans aged 18-39 had 3 times the odds of having severe pain compared to non-Veterans of the same age. A survey of over 9,000 Veterans with pain, published in 2020, revealed that Veterans continue to report high pain levels. Veterans reported a past-week mean pain severity of 6.75 on a 0-10 scale and a mean of 6.8 different pain locations. Over half (56%) of Veterans reported the effectiveness of the Veterans' pain treatment as fair to poor, with only 12% rating the Veterans' pain treatment as very good or excellent. Continued opioid-related harms, high levels of Veteran-reported pain, and low satisfaction with pain care indicate that, despite VA efforts to improve pain management, additional efforts are needed to help Veterans effectively manage chronic pain using safe, evidence-based approaches.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized control trial with behavioral intervention
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The assessors will be blinded to the treatment assignment when administering baseline outcome assessments

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OPTIONS Intervention Coaching

Intervention participants will participate in a series of four coaching sessions focused on helping patients clarify their values and treatment goals, aligning these values and goals and their lifestyle with nonpharmacological treatment options, working on overcoming barriers to use and adherence of nonpharmacological treatment options (using motivational interviewing), and preparing patients to discuss these options with their primary care providers. A decision aid will be used during these coaching sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Options for Pain Management using Non-medication Strategies

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The purpose of this study is to help Veterans learn about different ways they can manage chronic pain that do not involve medications. Veterans will work with a coach to explore their values and goals and how different non-medication approaches may fit into these values and goals.

OPTIONS Waitlist Control

Participants randomized into waitlist control group will receive the intervention decision aid after completing the last survey at 9 months. Participants will also be offered the opportunity to have a brief 20-minute session with a member of the OPTIONS study staff to help walk them through this decision aid.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Options for Pain Management using Non-medication Strategies

The purpose of this study is to help Veterans learn about different ways they can manage chronic pain that do not involve medications. Veterans will work with a coach to explore their values and goals and how different non-medication approaches may fit into these values and goals.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OPTIONS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* have musculoskeletal pain in the low back, cervical spine, or extremities (hip, knee, or shoulder) for at least 3 months,
* have at least moderate pain intensity and interference with function, defined by a score of 4 (possible range: 0-10) on the PEG, a 3-item measure of pain intensity, interference with enjoyment of life, and interference with general activity (obtained from phone screener),
* have a primary care appointment scheduled or due in approximately the next three months.
* open to trying new pain treatments

Exclusion Criteria

* a psychiatric hospitalization in the past 6 months,
* long-term opioid therapy
* severe medical conditions likely precluding participation (e.g., NY Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure) which includes heart attack, stroke, and cancer, or
* if the eligibility screener reveals cognitive impairment, defined by a score of \>3 (possible range: 0-6) on MMSE cognitive screen (obtained from phone screener), or
* if the eligibility screener reveals active suicidal ideation, or
* severe hearing/speech impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew J. Bair, MD MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marianne S Matthias, PhD MS BA

Role: CONTACT

Morgan H Traylor, MBA BS

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Angela L Rollins, PhD

Role: primary

317-771-4023

Linda A Collins, BS CRA

Role: backup

(317) 988-2722

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15351

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SDR 21-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Phrenic Nerve Infiltration in Neck Pain
NCT05605639 RECRUITING PHASE4