Patient-centered Goal Setting in the National Diabetes Prevention Program
NCT ID: NCT05559515
Last Updated: 2025-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
214 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-01
2025-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To address these challenges, we adapted the NDPP with an array of personalized goals for risk-reduction to meet individual needs (NDPP-Flex). We developed NDPP-Flex based on the Health Belief Model in which factors like personal characteristics, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy influence health outcomes. We also focused on no-cost modifications per our extensive prior research on NDPP implementation that identified both strengths (e.g., cost-effectiveness) and weaknesses (e.g., low reimbursement rates). We piloted NDPP-Flex with 95 diverse participants (e.g., 76% Latinx) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). We compared outcomes to a demographically matched sample (n=245) from our prior delivery of the standard NDPP with pre-set goals for ≥150 minutes of physical activity per week and ≥5% weight loss. NDPP-Flex participants had similar attendance, physical activity, and weight loss, yet achieved about four times greater A1C improvement (0.22 ± 0.05% vs. 0.06 ± 0.03%; p=.018) and likelihood of normoglycemia at follow-up (OR 4.62; p=.013 \[95% CI 1.38-15.50\]). Clinically, these outcomes are highly significant as a 0.2% A1C reduction is associated with 58% lower risk of diabetes at 3 years, and a return to normoglycemia predicts 56% lower long-term incidence of diabetes. Our findings were published in Diabetes Care along with an invited commentary which noted that our approach is "innovative" and "should be adopted as part of our national strategy of health promotion."
We propose a cluster-randomized controlled trial of NDPP-Flex versus the standard NDPP to evaluate effects on glycemia, heterogeneity of treatment effects, and mechanisms of change. We will recruit 200 diverse adults with prediabetes (A1C 5.7-6.4%) and normal weight or overweight/obesity. Participants will enroll in classes (N=20) that are randomized to deliver NDPP-Flex or the standard NDPP. The trial is designed to have \>95% power to detect anticipated treatment effects of \~0.2% A1C improvement and \~10% increase in participants who reach normoglycemia compared to the control arm. The study will be conducted by an expert team in a health system with the 8th largest network of FQHCs in the US (Denver Health) and in partnership with a premier research institution (University of Colorado). Specific aims are:
Aim 1. To assess effects of NDPP-Flex on A1C change (primary outcome) and achieving normoglycemia (A1C \<5.7%) at 12-months (secondary outcome). Hypothesis: Compared to the standard NDPP, NDPP-Flex will reduce A1C and increase the likelihood of normoglycemia.
Aim 2. To assess heterogeneity of treatment effects on A1C by demographic characteristics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, language) and for individuals of normal weight (vs. overweight/obesity) to understand for whom NDPP-Flex may be effective. Hypothesis: For all subgroups of participants, NDPP-Flex will result in equivalent or superior A1C improvement than the standard NDPP.
Aim 3. To explore effects of NDPP-Flex on other health outcomes (weight, diet, physical activity) and psychosocial outcomes (motivation, perceived control, perceived stress). We will explore these outcomes as mediators of glycemic improvement to understand the key mechanisms of change. Hypothesis: NDPP-Flex will have a greater positive effect on psychosocial factors than the standard NDPP, which will account for greater A1C improvement than differences in health outcomes.
Impact: NDPP-Flex could shift clinical guidelines from prescriptive (and largely unattainable) goals to a more person-centered approach to diabetes prevention. Moreover, NDPP-Flex will be preferable from a health equity lens if it is better for underserved groups and without diminishing benefits for others. This approach could also expand public health impact by reaching lean adults with prediabetes who are currently excluded from the NDPP (given its focus on overweight/obesity), but account for \~10-20% of incident diabetes cases. The results have strong implementation potential through rapid dissemination among \>2000 organizations that currently deliver the NDPP, and by contributing high-quality evidence to modernize clinical guidelines for prevention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
National Diabetes Prevention Program
The Diabetes Prevention Program was a successful clinical trial demonstrating that intensive lifestyle support for weight loss reduced diabetes incidence by 58%. The intervention was translated into the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) and disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a yearlong group-based program since 2012.
NDPP
Usual care NDPP only
NDPP-Flex
NDPP-Flex. The primary difference between NDPP-Flex and the standard NDPP is the approach to goal setting. In NDPP-Flex, coaches use the latest CDC-published curriculum, but adapted such that participants are encouraged to 1) set attainable, individually-tailored goals for risk-reduction, 2) adjust goals over time as needed, and 3) avoid all-or-nothing assessments of goal attainment. At each session, coaches provide a goal setting worksheet (see excerpt) with a simple, fillable format to better accommodate low literacy (e.g., "I will limit my soda and sugary drinks to \_\_ per day").
NDPP-Flex
NDPP + patient-centered goal setting
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NDPP-Flex
NDPP + patient-centered goal setting
NDPP
Usual care NDPP only
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* English- or Spanish-speaking
* Prediabetes (as defined by A1C of 5.7-6.4%)
* BMI ≥20 kg/m2 (≥18.5 kg/m2 if identifying as Asian)
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior participation in the NDPP
* Anti-hyperglycemic medication (e.g., metformin)
* Diabetes (type 1 or 2)
* BMI \<20 kg/m2 (\<18.5 kg/m2 if identifying as Asian)
18 Years
85 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rocio Pereira, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Denver Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denver Health
Denver, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-1695
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id