Trial Outcomes & Findings for What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names? (NCT NCT05550779)

NCT ID: NCT05550779

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Results Overview

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT."

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

109 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Results posted on

2024-09-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Mental Exercise: Intervention
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Mental Exercise: Control
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip about a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Overall Study
STARTED
54
55
Overall Study
COMPLETED
54
55
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names?

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=54 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Mental Exercise: Control
n=55 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Total
n=109 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT."

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses
Young Adults
16 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 9
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses
Older Adults
18 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 12

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT." These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses
Young Adults
15 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 9
16 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses
Older Adults
15 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 12
18 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental session

Population: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.

Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT." These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses
Young Adults
41 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 22
37 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 25
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses
Older Adults
39 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 25
34 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 20

Adverse Events

Mental Exercise: Intervention

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Mental Exercise: Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Lori James

University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Phone: 7192554172

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place