Trial Outcomes & Findings for What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names? (NCT NCT05550779)
NCT ID: NCT05550779
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT."
COMPLETED
NA
109 participants
During the 60-75 minute experimental session
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mental Exercise: Intervention
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Mental Exercise: Control
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip about a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
54
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
54
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
What Makes People Better at Retrieving Proper Names?
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=54 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip with mindful breathing
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Mental Exercise: Control
n=55 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Total
n=109 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPopulation: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT."
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses
Young Adults
|
16 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
|
15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 9
|
|
Percent of Familiar Faces With TOT Responses
Older Adults
|
18 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
|
15 Percent of familiar faces with TOTs
Standard Deviation 12
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPopulation: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT." These percentages are out of correct and TOT responses only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses
Young Adults
|
15 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 9
|
16 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
|
|
Percent of Known Names With TOT Responses
Older Adults
|
15 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 12
|
18 Percent of known names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the 60-75 minute experimental sessionPopulation: Some participants completed the experiment but their data were not included due to having distractions present during testing (e.g., another individual interrupting the participant), experiencing a terrible internet connection during testing, being uncomfortable with turning on their video during testing, and not meeting the age inclusion criteria after initially claiming that they did.
Percent of trials with name retrieval failures were measured on a task created for this purpose. Specifically, participants tried to provide names that fit photographs, indicating when a name got stuck on the "tip of their tongue" by saying "TOT." These percentages are out of all responses that are not correct or TOTs only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mental Exercise: Intervention
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of mindful breathig
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
Mental Exercise: Control
n=51 Participants
Participants follow instructions on a 10-minute audio clip of a story
Mental Exercise: Participant perform a 10-minute mental exercise
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses
Young Adults
|
41 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 22
|
37 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 25
|
|
Percent of Unknown Names With TOT Responses
Older Adults
|
39 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 25
|
34 Percent of unknown names with TOTs
Standard Deviation 20
|
Adverse Events
Mental Exercise: Intervention
Mental Exercise: Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place