Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Conbercept With Modified Treat-and-Extend Regimens in Exudative AMD

NCT ID: NCT05539235

Last Updated: 2022-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-12

Study Completion Date

2024-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective study. Data from patients diagnosed with nAMD who have never received related treatment were collected. Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T\&E" treatment plans. After three months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into two weeks and four weeks. Unlike the ALTAIR study, we cancel the maintenance criteria of classical T\&E regimens. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), last injection interval, and the number of injections were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective study. Data from patients diagnosed with nAMD who have never received related treatment were collected. Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T\&E" treatment plans. After three months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into two weeks and four weeks. Unlike the ALTAIR study, we cancel the maintenance criteria of classical T\&E regimens. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), last injection interval, and the number of injections were recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Randomization and Interventions Conbercept (0.5 mg) was injected intravitreally once a month for 3 months, and then the patients were randomly divided into a 2-week group and a 4-week group. 2-week group: The injection interval was adjusted to 2 weeks. 4-week group: The injection interval was adjusted to 4 weeks. In the 2-week group, if the visual acuity decreased by less than 5 letters and the lesions showed no signs of exudative activity, such as rebleeding and increased oedema, the patients were followed up 6 weeks after the third injection and injected intravitreally once. If the condition remained stable, the follow-up was extended to 8 weeks , vitreous infusion was performed, and then the vitreous injection interval was gradually extended. If visual acuity decreased by more than 5 letters or the lesions showed rebleeding, increased oedema and other anatomical indicators worsened, a 4-week injection interval was maintained or reduced to 2 weeks based on the extended injection interval. In the 4-week group, the patients were followed up 8 weeks after the third injection and injected intravitreally once. If the condition remained stable, the follow-up was extended to 12 weeks, and vitreous injection was performed. Then, the vitreous injection interval was gradually extended.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Peng Hui, chief physician of Ophthalmology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, randomly divided the enrolled patients into two groups when they only knew the patient number and did not know the specific situation of the patient.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2 week group

Drug injection adjustment interval is 2 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

different degrees of adjustment of the injection interval

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T\&E" treatment plans. After 3 months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into 2 weeks and 4 weeks.

4 week group

Drug injection adjustment interval is 4 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

different degrees of adjustment of the injection interval

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T\&E" treatment plans. After 3 months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into 2 weeks and 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

different degrees of adjustment of the injection interval

Treatment was an intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept using modified "T\&E" treatment plans. After 3 months of monthly intravitreal injections, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, and the degree of adjustment of the injection interval was divided into 2 weeks and 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Modified Treat-and-Extend Regimens

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥50 years and meeting the diagnostic criteria for exudative AMD
* OCTA suggesting the presence of subretinal neovascularization
* no prior treatment (anti-VEGF, PDT, etc.)
* best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 5-75 letters in the study eye.

Exclusion Criteria

* allergy to drugs needed in the diagnosis and treatment
* a history of internal eye surgery (except surgery about cataract), trauma, or fundus laser photocoagulation
* other ophthalmologic diseases besides nAMD or cataracts
* renal insufficiency and severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases
* surgery required due to vitreous hemorrhage during follow-up treatment
* recent preparation for childbirth, pregnancy or lactation
* poor compliance with diagnosis and treatment or difficulty conducting a regular outpatient review and cooperating with treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hui Peng

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hui Peng, PH.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Xie H, Ju H, Lu J, Wang X, Peng H. Comparative study on the efficacy of Conbercept and Aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Sci Rep. 2024 May 25;14(1):11997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62536-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38796619 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HPeng

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NT-101 Topical Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Wet AMD
NCT06704009 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2