Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condoms

NCT ID: NCT05536336

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

188 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-08

Study Completion Date

2024-06-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover and multi-center study to evaluate the clinical breakage and slippage of a new synthetic polyurethane male condom compared to a commercially available standard latex condom.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover and multi-center study to evaluate the clinical breakage and slippage of a new synthetic polyurethane male condom compared to a commercially available standard latex condom.

The duration of participation for each couple is approximately 6 weeks. Study subjects are given a set of one condom type to use for up to three consecutive weeks to complete each evaluation and then return for a set of the other condom type for another period of up to three weeks of evaluation.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the total clinical failure rate of a new test condom is comparable with the total clinical failure rate of a legally marketed latex condom when used during vaginal intercourse.

The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical slippage and breakage of the polyurethane and latex condoms, as well as user acceptance about using the devices and adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Performance of Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condom

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Okamoto Lubricated Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condom

The test device name is Okamoto 001 Lubricated Polyurethane Male Condom. The condom is made in Japan and conforms to ASTM D6324-11 (2017) Standard Test Methods for Male Condoms Made from Polyurethane.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Condom

Intervention Type DEVICE

Contraception

Latex condom

Commercially available latex lubricated condom.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Condom

Intervention Type DEVICE

Contraception

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Condom

Contraception

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for randomization into the study:

1. mutually monogamous, current relationship ≥ 3 months;
2. 18 years to 65 years of age;
3. sexually active, sufficient to meet protocol requirements; agree to have penile-vaginal intercourse with frequency sufficient to meet protocol requirements;
4. agree to use only study condoms during time of participation;
5. agree not to use drugs, ointments or non-study devices that can affect sexual performance or might affect the condom's physical property;
6. able to understand instructions for correct use of condoms;
7. no known sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS;
8. agree to use only lubricant(s) provided by the study;
9. agree to return any unopened condoms and lubricants;
10. agree not to wear any genital piercing jewelry while using study condoms;

l) willing to use the study products for minimum of 10 acts of vaginal intercourse within 6 weeks of study entry; l) willing and capable of following requirements of protocol, including willingness to respond to questions about reproductive and contraceptive history and use of condoms during interviews; m) agree to use and has internet/web access in order to complete the Diaries and Surveys using iMedNet's ePRO module; n) available for follow-up and reachable by telephone.

Exclusion Criteria

1. he/she is allergic or sensitive to natural rubber latex or polyurethane,
2. female partner is pregnant or desires to become so while participating in study,
3. subject knowingly has a sexually transmitted infection,
4. commercial sex workers,
5. itinerant persons who cannot be able to complete the study, e.g. migrant farm workers,
6. male partner has known erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction,
7. either partner is using any medications or preparation applied topically or intravaginally to the genitalia other than that supplied for the study,
8. either partner is an employee of study sponsor, competitor or affiliated with clinical research center,
9. currently participating in another sexual health clinical study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NAMSA

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Okamoto Industries, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physicians Research Group

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Angels Clinical Research Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Physicians Research Group

West Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Wellnow

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.