Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condoms
NCT ID: NCT05536336
Last Updated: 2025-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
188 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-08
2024-06-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Performance and Acceptability of a Synthetic Polyisoprene Male Condom Compared to a Natural Rubber Latex Condom
NCT06595836
Synthetic Male Condom Slippage-Breakage Study
NCT05370196
Evaluation of Polyurethane Male Condoms
NCT04622306
A 3-way Crossover Clinical Investigation to Assess the Performance of Two Different Sized Polyurethane Condoms Versus a Latex Condom in Healthy Monogamous Couples.
NCT06557499
Evaluation of 2 Synthetic Nitrile Male Condoms Compared to a Standard Latex Male Condom
NCT05912283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The duration of participation for each couple is approximately 6 weeks. Study subjects are given a set of one condom type to use for up to three consecutive weeks to complete each evaluation and then return for a set of the other condom type for another period of up to three weeks of evaluation.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the total clinical failure rate of a new test condom is comparable with the total clinical failure rate of a legally marketed latex condom when used during vaginal intercourse.
The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical slippage and breakage of the polyurethane and latex condoms, as well as user acceptance about using the devices and adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Okamoto Lubricated Synthetic Polyurethane Male Condom
The test device name is Okamoto 001 Lubricated Polyurethane Male Condom. The condom is made in Japan and conforms to ASTM D6324-11 (2017) Standard Test Methods for Male Condoms Made from Polyurethane.
Condom
Contraception
Latex condom
Commercially available latex lubricated condom.
Condom
Contraception
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Condom
Contraception
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. mutually monogamous, current relationship ≥ 3 months;
2. 18 years to 65 years of age;
3. sexually active, sufficient to meet protocol requirements; agree to have penile-vaginal intercourse with frequency sufficient to meet protocol requirements;
4. agree to use only study condoms during time of participation;
5. agree not to use drugs, ointments or non-study devices that can affect sexual performance or might affect the condom's physical property;
6. able to understand instructions for correct use of condoms;
7. no known sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS;
8. agree to use only lubricant(s) provided by the study;
9. agree to return any unopened condoms and lubricants;
10. agree not to wear any genital piercing jewelry while using study condoms;
l) willing to use the study products for minimum of 10 acts of vaginal intercourse within 6 weeks of study entry; l) willing and capable of following requirements of protocol, including willingness to respond to questions about reproductive and contraceptive history and use of condoms during interviews; m) agree to use and has internet/web access in order to complete the Diaries and Surveys using iMedNet's ePRO module; n) available for follow-up and reachable by telephone.
Exclusion Criteria
2. female partner is pregnant or desires to become so while participating in study,
3. subject knowingly has a sexually transmitted infection,
4. commercial sex workers,
5. itinerant persons who cannot be able to complete the study, e.g. migrant farm workers,
6. male partner has known erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction,
7. either partner is using any medications or preparation applied topically or intravaginally to the genitalia other than that supplied for the study,
8. either partner is an employee of study sponsor, competitor or affiliated with clinical research center,
9. currently participating in another sexual health clinical study.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NAMSA
OTHER
Okamoto Industries, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Physicians Research Group
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Angels Clinical Research Center
Miami, Florida, United States
Physicians Research Group
West Lafayette, Indiana, United States
Wellnow
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.