Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2024-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Carbohydrate-restricted Diet to Reverse Fatty Liver in Adolescents With Obesity
NCT02787668
Healthy Eating Through Reduction Of Excess Sugar
NCT02948647
Impact of Fructose Consumption on Intestinal Permeability in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) - a Pilot Study.
NCT01696487
Effect of Vitamin E on Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
NCT00655018
Soluble Fibre Supplementation in NAFLD
NCT05480696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypotheses
1. Obese adolescents with NAFLD treated with a low fructose /low HFCS diet over 12 weeks, in the absence of weight loss, will result in significant improvements in indices of hepatic ATP production and reduced liver/ skeletal muscle fat deposition when compared to the effects of a higher fructose/higher HFCS diet.
2. Obese adolescents with NAFLD treated with a low fructose /low HFCS diet over 12 weeks, in the absence of weight loss, will result in significant improvements in indices of visceral and subcutaneous adiposity, insulin resistance and markers of liver and cardio-metabolic dysfunction, inflammation and oxidative stress when compared to the effects of a higher fructose/higher HFCS diet.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Iso-caloric and low fructose /low HFCS diet (\~5% of total energy intake (TEI); HFCS max: 10-15% of total fructose intake) (n=35)
Dietary intervention
To compare an iso-caloric, low fructose diet (\~5% of total energy intake (TEI); HFCS max: 10-15% of total fructose intake) to an iso-caloric, higher fructose diet (\~10% of TEI; HFCS max 20-30% of total fructose intake) in adolescents with NAFLD. The 10% higher fructose diet is part of standard of care and is NOT the intervention.
Control group
Iso-caloric with higher fructose diet (\~10% of TEI; HFCS max 20-30% of total fructose intake) (n=35)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dietary intervention
To compare an iso-caloric, low fructose diet (\~5% of total energy intake (TEI); HFCS max: 10-15% of total fructose intake) to an iso-caloric, higher fructose diet (\~10% of TEI; HFCS max 20-30% of total fructose intake) in adolescents with NAFLD. The 10% higher fructose diet is part of standard of care and is NOT the intervention.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. All patients with a known primary diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes or those on insulin;
3. Patients on medications known to cause hepatic steatosis (e.g., methotrexate, corticosteroids, valproic acid, statins);
4. Patients with evidence of bridging fibrosis (8); and
5. Patients with a known significant history of smoking or alcohol consumption (6, 9) and
6. Any patient undergoing an active weight loss program and/or who has received bariatric surgery for the treatment of obesity
7. Any participant with a cardiac pacemaker or with metal pins as this is a contraindication for MRS/MRI testing
8. Any participant of child bearing potential who is known to be pregnant (as this is a contraindication to MRS/MRI) testing. All females of child bearing potential will be asked to undergo a routine pregnancy test (urine) prior to MRS/MRI testing. This will be conducted in the baseline study visit
9. Any child with significant developmental delay or a significant co-morbidity that precluded the ability to participate in study procedures
12 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Health services
OTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diana R Mager, PhD RD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Research Unit, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00049795
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.