Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effectiveness of CD388 to Prevent Flu in an Influenza Challenge Model in Healthy Adults (NCT NCT05523089)
NCT ID: NCT05523089
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Evaluation of the prophylactic effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on VL-AUC of influenza challenge virus as determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
59 participants
Day 1 (evening [pm]); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (morning [am] and pm); Day 8 (am)
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
Up to 168 participants in up to 2 cohorts were planned for enrollment in the study. Due to low participant eligibility, the randomization schedule was changed in Cohort 1 after the first quarantine group to only randomize participants to the 150 mg CD388 and placebo arms. With only 2 participants in the 50 mg CD388 arm, safety and demographic data only have been reported. Based on data from the planned interim analysis of Cohort 1, a decision was made to not proceed with Cohort 2.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
50 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 50 milligrams (mg) CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
29
|
2
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
27
|
2
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
50 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 50 milligrams (mg) CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
The Effectiveness of CD388 to Prevent Flu in an Influenza Challenge Model in Healthy Adults
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
50 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 50 milligrams (mg) CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
Total
n=59 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.00 years
n=5 Participants
|
27.50 years
n=7 Participants
|
32.00 years
n=5 Participants
|
31.00 years
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
72.90 kg
n=5 Participants
|
72.40 kg
n=7 Participants
|
75.60 kg
n=5 Participants
|
75.20 kg
n=4 Participants
|
|
Height
|
1.72 meters (m)
n=5 Participants
|
1.70 meters (m)
n=7 Participants
|
1.77 meters (m)
n=5 Participants
|
1.74 meters (m)
n=4 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
25.00 kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
|
25.15 kg/m^2
n=7 Participants
|
24.60 kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
|
24.90 kg/m^2
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (evening [pm]); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (morning [am] and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the prophylactic effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on VL-AUC of influenza challenge virus as determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
16.09 log[10] copies/milliliter (mL)*hour
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
10.70 log[10] copies/milliliter (mL)*hour
Standard Deviation 8.01
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (evening [pm]); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (morning [am] and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the prophylactic effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on VL-AUC of influenza challenge virus as determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
8.52 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Interval 6.4 to 39.8
|
6.40 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Interval 6.4 to 29.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) viral load of influenza as determined by quantifiable qRT-PCR measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Peak Viral Load by qRT-PCR After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
4.28 log[10] copies/mL
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
2.84 log[10] copies/mL
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) viral load of influenza as determined by quantifiable qRT-PCR measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Peak Viral Load by qRT-PCR After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
3.79 log[10] copies/mL
Interval 1.0 to 8.5
|
0.97 log[10] copies/mL
Interval 0.9 to 7.5
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (pm) until the first confirmed undetectable assessment after peak measurement, assessed up to Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. NOTE: Participants without a detectable qRT-PCR value were excluded from the analysis.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the time (in hours, as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) to confirmed negative test for influenza as determined by quantifiable qRT-PCR measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=12 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by qRT-PCR After Influenza Viral Challenge
75th Percentile
|
158.3 hours
Interval 134.1 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
131.7 hours
Interval 72.4 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
—
|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by qRT-PCR After Influenza Viral Challenge
25th Percentile
|
61.9 hours
Interval 14.7 to 120.3
|
66.7 hours
Interval 24.3 to 72.4
|
—
|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by qRT-PCR After Influenza Viral Challenge
Median
|
134.1 hours
Interval 61.9 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
79.4 hours
Interval 24.4 to 143.1
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on VL-AUC of influenza challenge virus as determined by viral culture on nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
5.82 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
3.95 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on VL-AUC of influenza challenge virus as determined by viral culture on nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
3.29 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Interval 3.2 to 14.4
|
3.29 log[10] copies/mL*hour
Interval 3.2 to 9.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) viral load of influenza as determined by quantitative viral culture measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Peak Viral Load by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
2.13 log[10] copies/mL
Standard Deviation 2.10
|
1.07 log[10] copies/mL
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) viral load of influenza as determined by quantitative viral culture measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Peak Viral Load by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
0.50 log[10] copies/mL
Interval 0.5 to 5.5
|
0.50 log[10] copies/mL
Interval 0.5 to 4.5
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (pm) until the first confirmed undetectable assessment after peak measurement, assessed up to Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. NOTE: Participants without a detectable viral culture value were excluded from the analysis.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the time (in hours, as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) to confirmed negative test for influenza as determined by quantifiable viral culture measurements in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=6 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
25th Percentile
|
71.4 hours
Interval 47.2 to 85.9
|
62.3 hours
Interval 24.3 to 85.9
|
—
|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
75th Percentile
|
110.1 hours
Interval 85.9 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
86.0 hours
Interval 62.3 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
—
|
|
Time to Confirmed Negative Test by Viral Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
Median
|
85.9 hours
Interval 47.5 to 110.1
|
78.7 hours
Interval 24.3 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event {i.e., the first result equal to not detected (less than the Lower Level of Detection \[\<LLOD\]) after peak measure} at the assessed timepoint.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on TSS-AUC as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment of the diary card as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms on that symptom score card, resulting in possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Area Under the Total Clinical Symptoms Score-Time Curve (TSS-AUC) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
7.66 TSS points*day
Standard Deviation 14.13
|
2.22 TSS points*day
Standard Deviation 4.86
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on TSS-AUC as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment of the diary card as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms on that symptom score card, resulting in possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Area Under the Total Clinical Symptoms Score-Time Curve (TSS-AUC) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
0.45 TSS points*day
Interval 0.0 to 48.3
|
0.86 TSS points*day
Interval 0.0 to 25.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) TSS score as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment of the diary card as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms on that symptom score card, resulting in possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Peak Total Clinical Symptoms Score (TSS) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
3.54 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 5.34
|
1.79 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 3.12
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) TSS score as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment of the diary card as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms on that symptom score card, resulting in possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Peak Total Clinical Symptoms Score (TSS) After Influenza Viral Challenge
|
1.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 21.0
|
1.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to Day 8Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) daily symptom score (i.e., individual maximum daily sum of symptom score) as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms, giving possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 2
|
2.29 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 4.60
|
0.75 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 3
|
2.79 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 5.10
|
1.25 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 6
|
0.79 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
0.39 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 7
|
0.43 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
0.07 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 1
|
0.64 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
0.46 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 4
|
2.11 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 3.83
|
0.82 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 5
|
1.07 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
0.36 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
—
|
|
Mean Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 8 Discharge
|
0.15 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.11 total symptom score
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 up to Day 8Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the peak (i.e., maximum) daily symptom score (i.e., individual maximum daily sum of symptom score) as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. At each assessment, the participant provides scores from 0 to 3 for a list of 13 symptoms (runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache, malaise/tiredness, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and wheeze). Grade 0: no symptoms; grade 1: just noticeable; grade 2: clearly bothersome from time to time but does not interfere with normal daily activities; grade 3: quite bothersome most or all the time and stops participation in activities. An individual Total Symptom Score (TSS) is derived at each assessment as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms, giving possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 2
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 17.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 11.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 3
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 21.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 4
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 14.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 6
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 9.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 7
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 1.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 8 Discharge
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 1
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
—
|
|
Median Individual Peak Daily Total Clinical Symptoms Score After Influenza Viral Challenge
Quarantine Day 5
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 8.0
|
0.00 total symptom score
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Starting Day 1, from the time of peak daily symptom score until the time of returning to baseline score, up to Day 8Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint. NOTE: Participants who only had a baseline TSS were excluded from the analysis.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the time (in hours, as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method) to symptom resolution (i.e., first time with Total Symptom Score \[TSS\] equal to the TSS at baseline after which no further increase above the baseline TSS was observed) as measured by graded daily symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily starting 1 day post viral challenge. An individual TSS is derived at each assessment of the diary card as the sum of the scores given to the 13 symptoms on that symptom score card, resulting in possible TSS values from 0 to 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=18 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Symptom Resolution After Influenza Viral Challenge
25th Percentile
|
8.4 hours
Interval 6.9 to 31.1
|
23.3 hours
Interval 6.7 to 54.3
|
—
|
|
Time to Symptom Resolution After Influenza Viral Challenge
Median
|
41.5 hours
Interval 8.4 to 72.7
|
74.8 hours
Interval 23.3 to 96.2
|
—
|
|
Time to Symptom Resolution After Influenza Viral Challenge
75th Percentile
|
78.7 hours
Interval 41.5 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event at the assessed timepoint.
|
133.5 hours
Interval 84.4 to
Some values were not computable due to the lack of an event at the assessed timepoint.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the number of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection, defined as 2 quantifiable (≥ lower limit of quantification \[LLOQ\]) qRT-PCR measurements (reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days), starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Influenza Infection
|
14 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Influenza Infection
|
14 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the percentage of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection, defined as 2 quantifiable (≥ lower limit of quantification \[LLOQ\]) qRT-PCR measurements (reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days), starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Influenza Infection
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.6 to 69.4
|
78.6 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 91.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Influenza Infection
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.6 to 69.4
|
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 8.3 to 41.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the number of participants with at least 1 positive quantitative (≥LLOQ) cell culture measurement in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
No Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture
|
17 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With at Least One Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
At Least 1 Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture
|
11 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the percentage of participants with at least 1 positive quantitative (≥LLOQ) cell culture measurement in nasal samples starting 1 day post viral challenge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
No Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture
|
60.7 percentage of participants
Interval 40.6 to 78.5
|
78.6 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 91.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture After Influenza Viral Challenge
At Least 1 Positive Quantitative (≥LLOQ) Cell Culture
|
39.3 percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 59.4
|
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 8.3 to 41.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For qRT-PCR measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For TSS measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the number of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection (2 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] qRT-PCR measurements \[reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days\]), AND * TSS score ≥2 at any single time point (i.e., any individual symptom diary card for which the sum of symptom scores is ≥2; e.g., at a minimum, ≥1 symptom of grade ≥2, or ≥2 symptoms of grade ≥1), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
19 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For qRT-PCR measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For TSS measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the percentage of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection (2 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] qRT-PCR measurements \[reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days\]), AND * TSS score ≥2 at any single time point (i.e., any individual symptom diary card for which the sum of symptom scores is ≥2; e.g., at a minimum, ≥1 symptom of grade ≥2, or ≥2 symptoms of grade ≥1), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
67.9 percentage of participants
Interval 47.6 to 84.1
|
85.7 percentage of participants
Interval 67.3 to 96.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
32.1 percentage of participants
Interval 15.9 to 52.4
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 32.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For qRT-PCR measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For symptom scoring measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the number of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed moderately severe symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection (2 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] qRT-PCR measurements \[reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days\]), AND * One or more symptoms of grade ≥2 at a single time point (i.e., on any individual symptom card), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
21 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For qRT-PCR measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For symptom scoring measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the percentage of participants with qRT-PCR-confirmed moderately severe symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection (2 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] qRT-PCR measurements \[reported on 2 or more independent nasal samples over 2 days\]), AND * One or more symptoms of grade ≥2 at a single time point (i.e., on any individual symptom card), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No qRT-PCR-confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 55.1 to 89.3
|
89.3 percentage of participants
Interval 71.8 to 97.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With qRT-PCR-Confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
qRT-PCR-confirmed Moderately Severe Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 10.7 to 44.9
|
10.7 percentage of participants
Interval 2.3 to 28.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For viral culture measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For TSS measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the number of participants with culture laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * Lab-confirmed culturable influenza infection (1 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] cell culture measurement in nasal samples), AND * TSS score ≥2 at any single time point (i.e., any individual symptom diary card for which the sum of symptom scores is ≥2; e.g., at a minimum, ≥1 symptom of grade ≥2, or ≥2 symptoms of grade ≥1), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Culture Lab-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No Culture Lab-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
20 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Culture Lab-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
Culture Lab-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: • For viral culture measurements: Day 1 (pm); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (am and pm); Day 8 (am) • For TSS measurements: Three (3) times per day, at the same time each day (±1 hour), on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7; and on Day 8 (am only)Population: The Per-Protocol Population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and were challenged with the study virus, and who have a valid result for at least 80% of the planned qRT-PCR nasal samples from Day 1 (pm) up to Day 8 (am) (i.e., at least 11 out of 14), and who present no major deviations likely to impact the evaluation of the primary efficacy endpoint.
Evaluation of the effect of CD388, when compared to placebo, on the percentage of participants with culture laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza infection starting 1 day post viral challenge, defined as: * Lab-confirmed culturable influenza infection (1 quantifiable \[≥LLOQ\] cell culture measurement in nasal samples), AND * TSS score ≥2 at any single time point (i.e., any individual symptom diary card for which the sum of symptom scores is ≥2; e.g., at a minimum, ≥1 symptom of grade ≥2, or ≥2 symptoms of grade ≥1), as measured by graded symptom scoring system (participant completed symptom diary card) collected 3 times daily.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Culture Lab-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
No Culture Lab-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
71.4 percentage of participants
Interval 51.3 to 86.8
|
85.7 percentage of participants
Interval 67.3 to 96.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Culture Lab-Confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection After Influenza Viral Challenge
Culture Lab-confirmed Symptomatic Influenza Infection
|
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 48.7
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 32.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 0 (viral challenge)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of solicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of inoculation with the influenza challenge virus, based on the number of participants reporting any solicited AE. Solicited AEs are those predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Solicited Adverse Events (AEs) From Subcutaneous (SQ) Dosing up to Viral Challenge - Number of Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 0 (viral challenge)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of solicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of inoculation with the influenza challenge virus, based on the number of events reported. Solicited AEs are those predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Solicited Adverse Events (AEs) From Subcutaneous (SQ) Dosing up to Viral Challenge - Number of Events
|
0 events
|
0 events
|
1 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 28 (±3 days)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of unsolicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of the Day 28 follow-up visit, based on the number of participants for whom any AE is observed. Unsolicited AEs are any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card. Results are categorized by period: * Period 1 (from Day -5 dosing to just before challenge virus inoculation on Day 0) * Period 2 (from Day 0 challenge virus inoculation to actual discharge from the quarantine unit \[as scheduled on Day 8 or later at PI's decision\]) * Period 3 (from actual discharge from the quarantine unit to Day 28 (±3 days)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Periods 1 and 2
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Period 2
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Periods 2 and 3
|
10 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Period 3
|
8 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Period 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 28 (±3 days)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of unsolicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of the Day 28 follow-up visit, based on the number of events reported. Unsolicited AEs are any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card. Results are categorized by period: * Period 1 (from Day -5 dosing to just before challenge virus inoculation on Day 0) * Period 2 (from Day 0 challenge virus inoculation to actual discharge from the quarantine unit \[as scheduled on Day 8 or later at PI's decision\]) * Period 3 (from actual discharge from the quarantine unit to Day 28 (±3 days)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Periods 1 and 2
|
4 events
|
2 events
|
2 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Period 2
|
3 events
|
1 events
|
2 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Periods 2 and 3
|
12 events
|
3 events
|
13 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Period 3
|
9 events
|
2 events
|
11 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to Day 28 Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Period 1
|
1 events
|
1 events
|
0 events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 180 (±14 days)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of unsolicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of the Day 180 final follow-up visit, based on the number of participants for whom any AE was observed. Unsolicited AEs are any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card. Results are categorized by period: * Period 3 (from actual discharge from the quarantine unit to Day 28 \[±3 days\]) * Period 4 (from Day 28\[±3 days\] to the final follow-up visit \[Day 180 ±14 days\]) * Across All Periods (from Day -5 dosing to the final follow-up visit \[Day 180 ±14 days\])
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Periods 3 and 4
|
16 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Period 4
|
9 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Period 3
|
8 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Participants
Across All Periods
|
19 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day -5 (dosing) up to Day 180 (±14 days)Population: The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they received.
Evaluation of the occurrence of unsolicited AEs in participants dosed with CD388, when compared with placebo, from the time of SQ dosing up to the time of the Day 180 final follow-up visit, based on the number of events reported. Unsolicited AEs are any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card. Results are categorized by period: * Period 3 (from actual discharge from the quarantine unit to Day 28 \[±3 days\]) * Period 4 (from Day 28\[±3 days\] to the final follow-up visit \[Day 180 ±14 days\]) * Across All Periods (from Day -5 dosing to the final follow-up visit \[Day 180 ±14 days\])
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=2 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 Participants
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Period 3
|
9 events
|
2 events
|
11 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Periods 3 and 4
|
21 events
|
2 events
|
32 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Across All Periods
|
25 events
|
4 events
|
34 events
|
|
Occurrence of Unsolicited AEs From SQ Dosing up to the Final Follow-up Visit - Number of Events
Period 4
|
12 events
|
0 events
|
21 events
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
50 mg CD388
150 mg CD388
All Arms
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 participants at risk
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of saline placebo, administered by subcutaneous (SQ) injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
Saline placebo: Sterile normal saline for injection
|
50 mg CD388
n=2 participants at risk
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 50 milligrams (mg) CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
150 mg CD388
n=28 participants at risk
Up to 30 participants randomized to receive a single dose of 150 mg CD388, administered by SQ injection, prior to being inoculated with the influenza challenge virus
CD388: CD388 liquid for injection
|
All Arms
n=59 participants at risk
The combined total of participants from all arms (Placebo, 50 mg CD388, and 150 mg CD388)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
41.4%
12/29 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
53.6%
15/28 • Number of events 19 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
47.5%
28/59 • Number of events 34 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.4%
2/59 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial vaginosis
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
6.8%
4/59 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.4%
2/59 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T-wave inversion
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
14.3%
4/28 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
10.2%
6/59 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Costochondritis
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tympanic membrane perforation
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Osteoma
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
0.00%
0/28 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
1.7%
1/59 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were collected for all participants from the time of signing the study-specific informed consent form until the last scheduled follow-up visit (Day 180 ±14 days).
For evaluation purposes, two categories of AE were defined: * Solicited AE: predefined events relating to reactogenicity (pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration/swelling) for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in a participant diary. * Unsolicited AE: any AEs observed by the participant or Principal Investigator (PI)/investigator which are not prelisted on a symptom diary card.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER