Evaluation of the Value of Perianal Infiltration During Thermodestruction of Haemorrhoidal Disease by Radiofrequency
NCT ID: NCT05519189
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
134 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-10
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This technique has shown satisfactory results and is an interesting option in the management of haemorrhoidal disease (6) with low postoperative pain (7).
In order to limit patients' postoperative pain and reduce their apprehension during defecation episodes, a perianal block has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients with a haemorrhoidectomy technique (8,9). In 2019, a prospective randomised trial (10) confirmed the value of this perianal block without a neurostimulator during a haemorrhoidal pack resection procedure. A perianal infiltration of 40 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine was performed. These 40ml were divided into 4 injections of 10ml each in the left and right antero-lateral position and in the left and right postero-lateral position in relation to the anal margin.
The hemorrhoidal pack resection technique is known to induce postoperative pain. Haemorrhoidal radiofrequency (RAFAELO® procedure) is a new minimally invasive technique that reduces postoperative pain and is usually performed on an outpatient basis (6). Currently, peri-anal infiltration is routinely performed for all haemorrhoidal surgery whether or not there is a haemorrhoidal resection. No studies have evaluated the relevance of maintaining peri-anal infiltration in non-resected haemorrhoidal surgery and in particular during radiofrequency haemorrhoidal packets. In addition, ropivacaine infiltration is not without risks. Local anaesthesia has potential risks for the patient:
* Adverse reaction or hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics and components
* Infection at the injection site or infiltration
* Haematoma at the injection or infiltration site The aim of our study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of discontinuing perianal infiltration in patients with thermodestructive haemorrhoidal surgery.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peri-anal infiltration of Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine
Peri-anal infiltration of Ropivacaine
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Peri-anal infiltration of Ropivacaine
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Failure to perform peri-anal ropivacaine infiltration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient scheduled to undergo hemorrhoidal thermodestruction surgery (RAFAELO® procedure)
* Patient able to understand the protocol and having given written informed consent to participate in the study
* Patient affiliated to the social security system or entitled to it
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with previous hemorrhoidectomy surgery (LONGO technique)
* Patient with previous pexy ligation surgery (HAL-RAR technique)
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics or components
* Patient with a long term (\>1 month) analgesic treatment (level II and III)
* Patient participating in another interventional clinical research protocol involving a drug or clinical investigation of a medical device
* Patient who is pregnant, breastfeeding or able to procreate without contraception
* Patient under guardianship, curatorship or deprived of liberty
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Departemental Vendee
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emeric ABET
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée
Farouk DRISSI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nantes University Hospital
Yann REDON
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, , France
Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire
Saint-Nazaire, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHD21_0121
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id