Trial Outcomes & Findings for Neuromodulation for Children With Cystic Fibrosis Experiencing Chronic Abdominal Pain (NCT NCT05515250)
NCT ID: NCT05515250
Last Updated: 2024-08-09
Results Overview
IBS-SSS is a tool for assessing IBS. Please refer to the following for further understanding of this tool. It records Part 1- Severity Score( 0-500 where 0 is no symptom and 500 is the severe symptoms) and Part 2 ' Other IBS Data' under which includes bowel habits, consistency of bowel movements, red flag symptoms, site of pain and absence from work due to IBS. We cannot use part 2 because it does not have assigned scoring system and as such not suitable for patients with CF due to know genetic mutation in CF causing many similar symptoms of IBS. It has nine stem q: five questions ( in Part 1) have scores of between 0 and 100 for each question, based on visual analogue scales, each minimum of 0 to max of 100.We report combined sub score at baseline and week 8. A score below 75 is seen in healthy people or in remission of IBS, 75-175 indicates mild disease, 175-300 moderate disease and over 300 severe. The score is interpreted as an absolute change from the baseline and at week 8.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
baseline and 8 weeks
2024-08-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Open Label
Only treatment Arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Neuromodulation for Children With Cystic Fibrosis Experiencing Chronic Abdominal Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Patient Open Label Intervention Arm
n=1 Participants
Use of neurostimulation device: In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
16 years
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
1 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeksIBS-SSS is a tool for assessing IBS. Please refer to the following for further understanding of this tool. It records Part 1- Severity Score( 0-500 where 0 is no symptom and 500 is the severe symptoms) and Part 2 ' Other IBS Data' under which includes bowel habits, consistency of bowel movements, red flag symptoms, site of pain and absence from work due to IBS. We cannot use part 2 because it does not have assigned scoring system and as such not suitable for patients with CF due to know genetic mutation in CF causing many similar symptoms of IBS. It has nine stem q: five questions ( in Part 1) have scores of between 0 and 100 for each question, based on visual analogue scales, each minimum of 0 to max of 100.We report combined sub score at baseline and week 8. A score below 75 is seen in healthy people or in remission of IBS, 75-175 indicates mild disease, 175-300 moderate disease and over 300 severe. The score is interpreted as an absolute change from the baseline and at week 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patient Open Label Intervention Arm
n=1 Participants
Use of neurostimulation device: In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
|
|---|---|
|
IBS Severity Scoring System-Change Between Baseline and Week 8 is Reported.
IBS Severity Scoring System at baseline
|
50 score on a scale
|
|
IBS Severity Scoring System-Change Between Baseline and Week 8 is Reported.
IBS Severity Scoring System at week 8
|
25 score on a scale
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeksName of categories/domains CFQ-R: 9 Quality of life domains: Physical, role/school, vitality, emotion, social, body image, eating, treatment burden, health perceptions. 3 symptom scales: Weight, respiratory, and digestion. Scaling of items: 5 distinct 4-point Likert scales (e.g., always/often/ sometime/never) Scoring: Range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. PedsQL consists of 74 items comprising 14 dimensions Likert scale from 0 to 4.Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0.Total Score: Sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales. PedsQL scoring interpretation: In general, the higher scores indicating better health for this measure. Baseline and week 8 reported
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patient Open Label Intervention Arm
n=1 Participants
Use of neurostimulation device: In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
|
|---|---|
|
CFQ-R and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Scale Score in Response to IB-Stim Treatment- Baseline and Week 8 Reported
CFQ-R score at baseline
|
75 score on a scale
|
|
CFQ-R and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Scale Score in Response to IB-Stim Treatment- Baseline and Week 8 Reported
PedsQL- Gastrointestinal Module score at baseline
|
78 score on a scale
|
|
CFQ-R and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Scale Score in Response to IB-Stim Treatment- Baseline and Week 8 Reported
CFQ-R score at week 8
|
70 score on a scale
|
|
CFQ-R and PedsQL Gastrointestinal Scale Score in Response to IB-Stim Treatment- Baseline and Week 8 Reported
PedsQL- Gastrointestinal Module score at week 8
|
73 score on a scale
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4Investigators hypothesize that at 4 weeks following PENFS treatment initiation, there will be a reduction in stool calprotectin to baseline. The higher the value, worse the disease. The value above 200 ug/mg is considered to be suggestive of significant inflammation in the gut.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patient Open Label Intervention Arm
n=1 Participants
Use of neurostimulation device: In humans, abdominal pain is modulated by the vagus nerve. Stimulation of the vagus nerve has been suggested to reduce visceral sensitivity and abdominal pain. IB-stim is the Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENS) device. It is a non-invasive, outpatient therapy. PENFS has been shown to be efficacious in pediatric patients with abdominal pain.
|
|---|---|
|
Reduction in Stool Calprotectin Inflammatory Markers in Response to IB-Stim-change Between Two Time Point is Reported.
Baseline
|
36 μg/mg
|
|
Reduction in Stool Calprotectin Inflammatory Markers in Response to IB-Stim-change Between Two Time Point is Reported.
Week 4
|
30 μg/mg
|
Adverse Events
Open Label
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place