Nituzumab (Taixinsheng ®) A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase II Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinomatreatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT05508347
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-20
2027-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
By Comparing TPF Induction Chemotherapy Combined With Nimotuzumab Concurrent Radiotherapy and Cisplatin Concurrent Radio-chemotherapy for Locally Advanced NPC
NCT03557112
A Phase II Study of TPF With PD-1 Inhibitor Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT06781112
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With LA-NPC
NCT04015661
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Axitinib
NCT01249547
Nimotuzumab in Combination With Chemoradiation for Nasopharyngeal Cancer
NCT01074021
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regarding the efficacy of nimotuzumab during concurrent chemoradiotherapy, Shi Xingyuan et al. conducted a prospective clinical trial in 2016. The control group was treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy single-agent cisplatin), and the experimental group was treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on the treatment of the control group. Combined with nimotuzumab, the short-term and long-term efficacy and toxic and adverse reactions of nimotuzumab combined with cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced (III-IVB stage) nasopharyngeal carcinoma were observed. The results showed that in the experimental group compared with the control group, the ORR was 100% VS.91.67% (p\<0.05) at 3 months after treatment, the CR rate at 3 months after treatment was 91.7% VS.79.3% (p\<0.05), and the 5-year OS was 87.5 % VS.62.5%, (P=0.036), the incidence of adverse reactions was basically the same (P\>0.05). In 2018, Wang retrospectively analyzed 1104 patients with stage III-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma, all of whom received concurrent chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy, with or without nimotuzumab. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and nimotuzumab was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a 5-year OS of 94.5% vs. 85.6% in the control group (P= 0.058), PFS 87.4 % vs. 81.3% (P=0.225), and the 5-year DMFS was 95.8% vs. 83.9% (P=0.007), respectively, indicating that concurrent chemoradiotherapy and nimotuzumab could achieve the best survival benefit after induction chemotherapy.
In the past, studies on the application of nimotuzumab during induction chemotherapy were carried out. In 2014, Song et al. conducted a prospective clinical study. A total of 168 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage II-IV) received 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC). ) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), of which 56 patients were added with Nimotuzumab (Nimo) and were divided into three groups: A, IC + CCRT; group B: IC (with Nimotuzumab) + CCRT; group C: IC + CCRT (Nimotuzumab added at the same time). IC+Nimo,+CCRT VS. IC+CCRT 5-year OS were 93.0% VS. 74.8%, P=0.038, IC+Nimo,+CCRT VS. IC+CCRT 5-year PFS rates were 89.3% VS. .72.7% (P=0.144). There were no significant adverse reactions in the nimotuzumab treatment group. The 5-year OS and PFS of group C were 80.4 ± 7.9% and 76.4 ± 8.5%, respectively, which were not statistically significant compared with group A (p = 0.257 and p = 0.611, respectively). In 2019, Lu Ying et al. conducted a multi-center clinical study, including 58 patients in the III-IVB NPF group (Nimotuzumab combined with PF regimen induction therapy group) and 60 TPF patients (docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil regimen induction therapy group) Chemotherapy group), after 2 cycles of induction therapy, all patients received cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The safety and short-term efficacy of the two groups were compared. In the induction stage, the ORR NPF VS.TPF of cervical lymph nodes and nasopharyngeal primary lesions were 70.69% VS. 0.05). Compared with the TPF group, induction therapy in the NPF group had a more significant effect on cervical lymph nodes (81% vs. 60% P=0.036). There was no significant difference in efficacy evaluation (P\>0.05). During induction therapy, neutropenia and gastrointestinal reactions were significantly improved compared with TPF group (P=0.028, P=0.049). During the concurrent chemoradiotherapy phase, compared with the TPF group, the gastrointestinal reaction, oral mucositis and radiodermatitis in the NPF group were significantly improved (P=0.038, P=0.041, P=0.035). It shows that for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving cisplatin concurrent IMRT, induction therapy with nimotuzumab combined with PF regimen has better lymph node remission rate and milder adverse reactions; the patient is resistant to subsequent concurrent chemoradiotherapy The receptivity is better, but the long-term efficacy needs further follow-up observation.
In addition, Zhao Chong et al. conducted an open-label, multi-center, phase II clinical trial to explore the efficacy and adverse reactions of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combined with nimotuzumab in the treatment of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after previous treatment. In this study, PF chemotherapy The objective response rate of patients in the combined nimotuzumab treatment group was 71.4%, the disease control rate was 85.7%, and the median progression-free survival time was 6.47 months, which was longer than that of the PF chemotherapy group alone in the phase III study during the same period (patients in the PF chemotherapy group). The objective response rate was 42%, and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months), and in patients who received ≥12 doses of nimotuzumab-targeted therapy, the objective response rate was 92.6%, and the median progression-free survival was 92.6%. The time was 7.29 months, and the curative effect was significantly better than that of PF chemotherapy alone or GP chemotherapy group.
Based on the results of previous relevant studies, nimotuzumab combined with induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a certain curative effect on nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and there are no significant adverse reactions. However, there is currently a lack of prospective application research data on the short-term efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab (Taixinsheng®) combined with induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
3 cycles of docetaxel combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of 200mg nituzumab targeted therapy, and sequential 2-3 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on cisplatin chemotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy.
Nituzumab/placebo
Test group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of nituzumab targeted therapy followed by 2-3 cycles of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 16 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, equivalent to the whole course targeted therapy.
Control group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of placebo treatment followed by 2-3 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, only targeted therapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy
control group
3 cycles of docetaxel combined with cisplatin induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of placebo treatment, and sequential 2-3 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on cisplatin chemotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy
Nituzumab/placebo
Test group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of nituzumab targeted therapy followed by 2-3 cycles of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 16 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, equivalent to the whole course targeted therapy.
Control group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of placebo treatment followed by 2-3 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, only targeted therapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nituzumab/placebo
Test group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of nituzumab targeted therapy followed by 2-3 cycles of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 16 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, equivalent to the whole course targeted therapy.
Control group: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy combined with 9 times of placebo treatment followed by 2-3 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, a total of 7 times of nituzumab targeted therapy, only targeted therapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age: 18-70 years old, gender is not limited.
3. Nasopharynx squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed by histopathology.
4. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma 2018 AJCC (Eighth Edition) staging: t2-4n2m0 (metastatic lymph nodes have one of the following risk factors: the shortest length of the largest lymph node is ≥ 3cm or the lymph node is liquefied and necrotic or the lymph node envelope is invaded) or t1-4n3m0.
5. Immunohistochemistry: EGFR (+).
6. The primary tumor can be measured.
7. Kaplan score \> 70.
8. Survival expectation ≥ 6 months.
9. Women in childbearing period should ensure to take effective contraception during the study period.
10. Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 90 g / L, white blood cell (WBC) ≥ 4 × 109 / L, platelet (PLT) ≥ 90 × 109 /L.
11. Liver function: ALT and / or ast \< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value (ULN), and TBIL \< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value (ULN).
Renal function: serum creatinine \< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal value (ULN); Creatinine clearance rate shall not be lower than 60ml / min.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The primary tumor or lymph node has been treated surgically (except biopsy).
3. Patients with primary focus or lymph nodes who have received radiotherapy.
4. Those who have received epidermal growth factor targeted therapy.
5. The primary lesion has received chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
6. Have had other malignant tumors (except non melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ).
7. Subjects who have received other drug tests in the past 1 month.
8. \> grade I peripheral neuropathy.
9. Pregnant or lactating women and women of childbearing age who refuse contraception during the treatment observation period.
10. Those with severe allergic history or special constitution.
11. A history of severe lung or heart disease.
12. Known to be infected with HIV virus or active viral hepatitis.
13. Received live vaccine within 30 days of the planned start of study drug treatment.
14. Those who refuse or cannot sign the informed consent form.
15. Drug or alcohol addicts.
16. Persons with personality or mental illness, without or with limited capacity for civil conduct.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mei Feng
Chief physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MEI FENG, doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
四川省肿瘤研究所
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sichuan Cancer Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ahead-NC-202203
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.