RM1 Project 1 - tAN Naloxone

NCT ID: NCT05490134

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

136 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-22

Study Completion Date

2027-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This two-visit, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, uses a novel naloxone blockade model in 136 individuals to determine whether the analgesic effects of a 30-minute transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) intervention are mediated through a release of endogenous opioids. Analgesic effects of four various stimulation interventions will be measured (auricular vagus, auricular trigeminal, combination, or sham) while varying the type of intravenous (IV) infusion (either naloxone or saline) a participant is administered to determine whether the analgesic effects are mitigated by pharmacological opioid receptor blockade.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The demand for chronic pain treatment has demonstrated an unprecedented increase over the last several decades, in part contributing to an unsustainable surge in opioid prescriptions. Countless patients were escalated to prolonged, high-dose opioid regimens over years of treatment. By 2014, 5.4% of US adults were estimated to use prescription opioids on a long-term basis. As the harms of opioid proliferation became increasingly clear, a dramatic paradigm shift occurred in which these drugs came to be seen as often more dangerous than beneficial for chronic pain. New clinical guidelines highlighted the risks of high-dose regimens as well as limited benefits, particularly insufficient analgesia, associated with long-term use. According to this new perspective, the preferred therapeutic modality for many patients is to significantly reduce, or even completely stop, using opioids.

Stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) has demonstrated additional benefits for reducing the need for opioids for pain as well as lessening opioid withdrawal symptoms. Clinical trials of ABVN stimulation as an adjunctive treatment for pain have noted decreased intake of tramadol, remifentanil, morphine, as well as naproxen plus tramadol. A pioneering study of electrical stimulation at the cymba conchae in eight persons with opioid use disorder found significantly reduced withdrawal symptoms: first, decreases in anxiety, craving for opioids, chills, nausea; second, reduced bone and joint pain. Results in follow-up clinical trials bolstered the efficacy of ABVN stimulation for opioid withdrawal. More recently, an open-label trial of simultaneous ABVN and trigeminal stimulation found reduced withdrawal symptoms and decreased need for morphine maintenance in newborns with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (see Preliminary Studies, below). This method of simultaneous vagal and trigeminal stimulation via the external ear is known as transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN), as the targets of electrical stimulation include the ABVN and auriculotemporal nerve (ATN), which is a branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve. Electrodes applied to select dermatome regions can target ear neural structures and deliver non-invasive VNS and TNS.

Use of tAN devices for pain relief is an attractive alternative to pharmacologic and opioid-based approaches because it is safe and effective and presents no addiction liability. In order to increase clinical adoption and optimize efficacy of these devices, the mechanism of action must be fully characterized.

This study is investigating the anti-pain mechanism behind tAN in a healthy cohort. This study begins to understand whether the anti-pain effects are driven by a release of endogenous opioids - and will accomplish this by administering tAN during aμ-opioid receptor blockade (via naloxone IV). Administering tAN concurrently with IV Naloxone or Saline (control) will allow us to better understand what underlying mechanism drives the analgesic effects of tAN, and whether the blockade of opioid receptors blocks the anti-pain effects of tAN.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

All participants will be randomized to one of four stimulation groups in a 1:1:1:1 fashion such that each group will have 34 participants. Within each group, participants will be randomized to either receive naloxone or saline on their first visit, and the opposite on their second visit. The drug visit will be counterbalanced within each group to avoid a potential order confound.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ABVN Only Stimulation

30 minutes of ABVN Only stimulation (15Hz stimulation of cymba conchae).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.15mg/kg bolus of normal saline in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

ATN Only Stimulation

30 minutes of ATNS Only stimulation (100Hz stimulation adjacently anterior to the tragus)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.15mg/kg bolus of normal saline in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Combination (ABVN + ATN) Stimulation

30 minutes of Combo stimulation (stimulation of both the 15Hz cymba conchae and 100HZ adjacently anterior to the tragus)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.15mg/kg bolus of normal saline in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Sham Stimulation

30 minutes of Sham (15Hz stimulation of the earlobe)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Naloxone

Intervention Type DRUG

A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.15mg/kg bolus of normal saline in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Naloxone

A 0.15 mg/kg bolus dose of naloxone in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

0.15mg/kg bolus of normal saline in 10ml normal saline will be administered via an intravenous (IV) line inserted into the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-65
* Have the capacity and ability to provide one's own consent and sign the informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindicated for MRI.
* Any current or recent untreated medical, neurological, or psychiatric conditions
* Metal implant devices in the head, heart or neck.
* History of brain surgery.
* History of myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, bradycardia.
* Personal or family history of seizure or epilepsy or personal use of medications that substantially reduce seizure threshold (e.g., olanzapine, chlorpromazine, lithium).
* Personal history of head injury, concussion, or self-report of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
* Individuals suffering from frequent/severe headaches.
* Individuals with a reported history of psychosis or mania, or individuals who are actively manic or psychotic.
* Regular or recent pain medication use
* Moderate to severe alcohol or substance use disorder.
* Psychotropic or cardiac medicines that may interact with naloxone
* Positive urine drug screen for opiate use
* Females who are pregnant or lactating
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeffrey Borckardt

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bashar Badran, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 8437926076

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bashar W Badran, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00122762

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id