Gender Disparities in Voice Outcomes After Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Total Laryngectomy Patients (UC Davis)

NCT ID: NCT05489965

Last Updated: 2025-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-31

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To perform a multi-site prospective study assessing, both subjectively and objectively, the gender disparities in speech outcomes of patients using TEP after total laryngectomy.

The investigators hypothesize that speech outcomes, both subjective and objective measures, will be significantly poorer for female patients compared to male patients. The outcome of the study is to prospectively assess both subjective and objective gender disparities in voice and speech outcomes of patients using TEP after total laryngectomy across a multiple institutions. The investigators hypothesize that both subjective and objective measurements of voice, speech and quality of life will be poorer for female patients in comparison to male patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total laryngectomy (TL) is typically performed in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer as a means of removing the entire larynx and surrounding structures that have been affected by the malignancy. Following total laryngectomy, patients lose ability to produce voice. Thus, they require the use of alternative methods of to produce voice along with extensive speech rehabilitation. Currently, there are three main speech alternative options, esophageal speech, tracheoesophageal speech, and electrolarynx speech. The focus of this study will be on patients rehabilitating their speech using tracheosophgeal speech through a tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP). It has been shown that generally for TL patients, better voice quality and satisfaction with voice is associated with improved quality of life. Currently, speech rehabilitation outcomes are measured with a multidimensional approach, using various scales ranging from acoustic analysis, perceptual evaluation, and patient-reported outcomes. The majority of studies analyzing outcomes in total laryngectomy patients, however, is predominated by assessment of the male laryngectomee population. Historically, this has been due to the greater incidence of laryngeal cancers in males than females. Due to this, there has been minimal research investigating potential gender differences in the laryngectomy population. Of the limited data available regarding the female laryngectomee population, it has been shown that gender frequency differences seen in normal subjects are lost following total laryngectomy and the resulting tracheoesophageal voice is more similar to the normal male voice, thus females face a greater voice handicap compared to their male counterparts (Kazi, 2006; Deore, 2011). While some studies have assessed the resulting quality of life differences between the genders in the laryngectomy population (Lee, 2010), few have investigated voice outcomes using both subjective and objective scales as used in this study. The outcomes of this study will be key to understanding what metrics are potentially contributing to the voice and lifestyle dissatisfaction that prior studies have demonstrated in the female laryngectomee population. This quantifiable data will provide a way of modifying future voice rehabilitation in the female population to enable better satisfaction and minimize gender differences in voice outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Speech Disorders Speech Dysfunction Laryngectomy; Status Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis Total Laryngectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female subjects who have completed total laryngectomy and are using TEP

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have not completed total laryngectomy and are not using TEP
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California San Diego

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jasmine Cate

Role: CONTACT

8582463035

Debanjali Ghosh

Role: CONTACT

858.246.0357

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kristen Linnemeyer, CCC-SLP, BCS-S

Role: primary

Kayleigh N Hernandez, BS

Role: backup

(858) 246-0357

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1509981

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Injection Versus Suture Repair of Laryngeal Clefts
NCT07057258 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA