Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Evaluating the Effect of Filgotinib Dose De-escalation in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in Remission (NCT NCT05479058)
NCT ID: NCT05479058
Last Updated: 2024-10-04
Results Overview
The mMCS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The mMCS was calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy. Each subscore was graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. The total mMCS score ranged from 0 to 9 with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. The mMCS remission was defined as a total score of score ≤2, with endoscopic subscore of ≤1, stool frequency subscore of ≤1, and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Corticosteroid-free mMCS remission was defined as being free of corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
22 participants
Week 48
2024-10-04
Participant Flow
Participants who were in clinical remission with filgotinib 200 milligrams (mg) once daily for at least 2 consecutive quarterly visits in the ongoing long-term extension (LTE) SELECTION-LTE study (GS-US-418-3899; NCT02914535) and who met the eligibility criteria, were rolled over and randomized to this study. Participants were enrolled at study sites in Poland, France, Germany, the United States, Belgium, Republic of Korea, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
The clinical trial was originally designed with the primary endpoint to be assessed at Week 48 after which participants would have received unblinded treatment. Due to early termination of the study, none of the participants completed 48 weeks of treatment. All participants participated in blinded treatment period only and the study was unblinded globally after study completion.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
|
10
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Evaluating the Effect of Filgotinib Dose De-escalation in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in Remission
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=5 Participants
|
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=7 Participants
|
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: As the study was terminated prior to any participant reaching the primary analysis time point at Week 48, the data for this endpoint was not collected and analyzed.
The mMCS is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The mMCS was calculated as the sum of the 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy. Each subscore was graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. The total mMCS score ranged from 0 to 9 with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. The mMCS remission was defined as a total score of score ≤2, with endoscopic subscore of ≤1, stool frequency subscore of ≤1, and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Corticosteroid-free mMCS remission was defined as being free of corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48Population: Participants in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once) were analyzed.
PRO2 flare was defined as a PRO2 score worsening of at least 2 points and an absolute PRO2 score of at least 3, with stool frequency subscore ≥2, and rectal bleeding subscore ≥1. PRO2 included items of stool frequency and rectal bleeding. The range of each item score was 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Patient-Reported Outcome Based on 2 Items (PRO2) Flare
|
NA days
Due to insufficient number of participants with PRO2 flare, the median and 95% CI data could not be calculated.
|
NA days
Due to insufficient number of participants with PRO2 flare, the median and 95% CI data could not be calculated.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48Population: Participants in the FAS were analyzed.
An ES-confirmed UC flare was defined as an increase in rectal bleeding subscore by at least 1 point and an increase in stool frequency subscore by at least 2 points and an increase in endoscopic subscore by at least 1 point. Each subscore graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to ES-Confirmed UC Flare
|
NA days
Due to insufficient number of participants with ES-confirmed UC flare, the median and 95% CI data could not be calculated.
|
NA days
Due to insufficient number of participants with ES-confirmed UC flare, the median and 95% CI data could not be calculated.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed. As the study was terminated prior to any participant reaching the Week 48 time point, the data for Week 48 time point was not collected and analyzed.
CRP is an acute-phase protein which provides an objective criterion of inflammatory activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Change at Week 4
|
0.166 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.533
|
1.713 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 4.423
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Change at Week 12
|
0.532 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.128
|
10.406 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 26.944
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Change at Week 24
|
0.156 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.128
|
16.002 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 34.093
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Change at Week 36
|
0.367 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.192
|
1.443 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.525
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, and Week 48Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed. As the study was terminated prior to any participant reaching the Week 48 time point, the data for Week 48 time point was not collected and analyzed.
Fecal calprotectin, a very stable biomarker, was a 36 kilodalton calcium and zinc binding protein of S-100 protein family which was neutrophil derived. It represents 60% of cytosolic proteins in neutrophils and was a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=8 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)
Change at Week 4
|
-27.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 37.2
|
142.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 307.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)
Change at Week 12
|
-16.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 48.1
|
920.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 1996.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)
Change at Week 24
|
-52.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 54.6
|
374.3 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 674.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)
Change at Week 36
|
-46.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 65.8
|
-8.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Standard Deviation 70.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48Population: As the study was terminated prior to any participant reaching the Week 48 time point, the data for this endpoint was not collected and analyzed.
The IBDQ is disease-specific questionnaire used for an assessment of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in participants with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). It comprised of 32 questions divided into four health subscales: bowel symptoms (10 questions); systemic symptoms, including sleep disorders and fatigue (5 questions); emotional function such as depression, aggression, and irritation (12 questions); and social function, meaning the ability to participate in social activities and to work (5 questions). The IBDQ total score was calculated as the sum of the responses (each ranging from 1 \[severe problem\] to 7 \[normal health\]) to all 32 questions. Total IBDQ score ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better HRQoL.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48Population: Participants in the Safety analysis set were analyzed.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence, new or worsening of any preexisting condition, in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as * An AE which had a start date equal to or after the date of the first administration of study drug in this study and no later than 30 days after last administration of study drug. * And was either a newly reported event, or a worsening of an existing event. Serious TEAE was defined as a TEAE that * Resulted in death and was life-threatening; * Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly / birth defect; * Was medically significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=11 Participants
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
TEAEs
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Serious TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Filgotinib 200 mg
Filgotinib 100 mg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Filgotinib 200 mg
n=11 participants at risk
Participants received filgotinib 200 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg once daily orally.
|
Filgotinib 100 mg
n=11 participants at risk
Participants received filgotinib 100 mg and placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg once daily orally.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Campylobacter infection
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Actinic keratosis
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
|
Social circumstances
Postmenopause
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Baseline up to Week 48
The Safety Analysis Set included all randomized participants who were administered study drug at least once.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The sponsor must review and approve any results of the study or abstracts for professional meetings prepared by the investigator(s). Published data must not compromise the objectives of the study. Data from individual study centers in multicenter studies must not be published separately.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER