Inhalation of Sevoflurane Versus Intravenous Midazolam,Ketamine,Propofol For Pediatrics Undergoing Upper GI Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT05474937

Last Updated: 2022-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the field of pediatric gastroenterology, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has established itself as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In order to increase patient tolerance during this procedure, deep sedation is essential. Children are at a higher risk of serious adverse effects from procedural sedation; thus, their safety is a primary issue throughout this procedure. Multiple studies have been done to find the ideal method for procedural sedation in terms of ease of administration, quality, safety of sedation and recovery profile, but the consensus seems lacking. In this study we will compare between nasal inhalation of sevoflurane versus intravenous ketamine, midazolam and propofol for pediatrics undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper GI Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective randomized clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

inhalational Sevoflurane

In the field of pediatric gastroenterology, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has established itself as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. In order to increase patient tolerance during this procedure, deep sedation is essential. Children are at a higher risk of serious adverse effects from procedural sedation; thus, their safety is a primary issue throughout this procedure. Multiple studies have been done to find the ideal method for procedural sedation in terms of ease of administration, quality, safety of sedation and recovery profile, but the consensus seems lacking. In this study we will compare between nasal inhalation of sevoflurane versus intravenous ketamine, midazolam and propofol for pediatrics undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sevoflurane Inhalation Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in inhalational group will receive Sevoflurane at 7% dial concentration in 100% O2 by an appropriately sized face mask until adequate sedation occurs as adequate jaw relaxation for the endoscope insertion and attainment of Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) 7 (i.e., Asleep, reflex withdrawal to painful stimuli only).

Midazolam, Ketamine and Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Preoxygenation with 100% O2 for 1 minute, by proper sized face mask. Patients in Ketamine -midazolam -propofol (KMP) group will receive 1-1.5 mg/kg IV ketamine and 0.05mg/kg IV Midazolam and 1mg/kg IV Propofol as induction dose then followed by incremental doses of 0.5 mg/kg IV Propofol alone for maintenance and if procedure is prolonged propofol infusion at 100 μg/kg/min is given for maintenance of sedation. Induction dose will be considered as adequate if adequate jaw relaxation for endoscope insertion and Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) ≥7 occurs with maintenance of spontaneous respiration. Induction time will be considered as time from beginning of IV agent to achievement of MRSS ≥7. After endoscope insertion, maintenance of oxygenation by nasal cannula at flow twice the minute ventilation of the patient

Intravenous Ketamine, Midazolam and Propofol group

Preoxygenation with 100% O2 for 1 minute, by proper sized face mask. Patients in Ketamine -midazolam -propofol (KMP) group will receive 1-1.5 mg/kg IV ketamine and 0.05mg/kg IV Midazolam and 1mg/kg IV Propofol as induction dose then followed by incremental doses of 0.5 mg/kg IV Propofol alone for maintenance and if procedure is prolonged propofol infusion at 100 μg/kg/min is given for maintenance of sedation. Induction dose will be considered as adequate if adequate jaw relaxation for endoscope insertion and Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) ≥7 occurs with maintenance of spontaneous respiration. Induction time will be considered as time from beginning of IV agent to achievement of MRSS ≥7. After endoscope insertion, maintenance of oxygenation by nasal cannula at flow twice the minute ventilation of the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sevoflurane Inhalation Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in inhalational group will receive Sevoflurane at 7% dial concentration in 100% O2 by an appropriately sized face mask until adequate sedation occurs as adequate jaw relaxation for the endoscope insertion and attainment of Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) 7 (i.e., Asleep, reflex withdrawal to painful stimuli only).

Midazolam, Ketamine and Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Preoxygenation with 100% O2 for 1 minute, by proper sized face mask. Patients in Ketamine -midazolam -propofol (KMP) group will receive 1-1.5 mg/kg IV ketamine and 0.05mg/kg IV Midazolam and 1mg/kg IV Propofol as induction dose then followed by incremental doses of 0.5 mg/kg IV Propofol alone for maintenance and if procedure is prolonged propofol infusion at 100 μg/kg/min is given for maintenance of sedation. Induction dose will be considered as adequate if adequate jaw relaxation for endoscope insertion and Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) ≥7 occurs with maintenance of spontaneous respiration. Induction time will be considered as time from beginning of IV agent to achievement of MRSS ≥7. After endoscope insertion, maintenance of oxygenation by nasal cannula at flow twice the minute ventilation of the patient

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sevoflurane Inhalation Solution

Patients in inhalational group will receive Sevoflurane at 7% dial concentration in 100% O2 by an appropriately sized face mask until adequate sedation occurs as adequate jaw relaxation for the endoscope insertion and attainment of Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) 7 (i.e., Asleep, reflex withdrawal to painful stimuli only).

Intervention Type DRUG

Midazolam, Ketamine and Propofol

Preoxygenation with 100% O2 for 1 minute, by proper sized face mask. Patients in Ketamine -midazolam -propofol (KMP) group will receive 1-1.5 mg/kg IV ketamine and 0.05mg/kg IV Midazolam and 1mg/kg IV Propofol as induction dose then followed by incremental doses of 0.5 mg/kg IV Propofol alone for maintenance and if procedure is prolonged propofol infusion at 100 μg/kg/min is given for maintenance of sedation. Induction dose will be considered as adequate if adequate jaw relaxation for endoscope insertion and Modified Ramsay Sedation Score (MRSS) ≥7 occurs with maintenance of spontaneous respiration. Induction time will be considered as time from beginning of IV agent to achievement of MRSS ≥7. After endoscope insertion, maintenance of oxygenation by nasal cannula at flow twice the minute ventilation of the patient

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. A consent from the parents or 1st degree relative.
2. Both sexes.
3. Pediatric patients aged 1year to 4 years old undergoing
4. elective upper GI endoscopy.
5. ASA class I \&II.
6. BMI between 5th percentile and the 85th percentile (http://www.kidshealth.org).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to drugs included in the study.
2. Difficult airway or known airway problems.
3. Active bleeding from esophageal varices.
4. Respiratory and cardiac problems.
5. Neurological disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

4 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salih Salim Salih Bahri

Resident of anesthesia and intensive care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zagazig University Hospitals

Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Salih Salim Salih, MBCCH

Role: CONTACT

01142905781 ext. 002

Nahla M Amin, MD

Role: CONTACT

01151980960 ext. 002

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Salih Salim Salih, MBCCH

Role: primary

01142905781 ext. 002

Nahla M Amin, MD

Role: backup

01151980960 ext. 002

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Agostoni M, Fanti L, Gemma M, Pasculli N, Beretta L, Testoni PA. Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):266-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.028. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21704990 (View on PubMed)

Agrawal D, Feldman HA, Krauss B, Waltzman ML. Bispectral index monitoring quantifies depth of sedation during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00721-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14747816 (View on PubMed)

Basturk A, Artan R, Yilmaz A. Efficacy and safety of midazolam and ketamine in paediatric upper endoscopy. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun;18(2):80-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28579345 (View on PubMed)

Biliskov AN, Ivancev B, Pogorelic Z. Effects on Recovery of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol versus Ketofol for Short-Lasting Laparoscopic Procedures. Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 19;8(7):610. doi: 10.3390/children8070610.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34356589 (View on PubMed)

Gaya da Costa M, Kalmar AF, Struys MMRF. Inhaled Anesthetics: Environmental Role, Occupational Risk, and Clinical Use. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 22;10(6):1306. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061306.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33810063 (View on PubMed)

Oh C, Kim Y, Eom H, Youn S, Lee S, Ko YB, Yoo HJ, Chung W, Lim C, Hong B. Procedural Sedation Using a Propofol-Ketamine Combination (Ketofol) vs. Propofol Alone in the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):943. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070943.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31261820 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9535

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine and Propofol for Upper Endoscopy
NCT02295553 COMPLETED PHASE4
Sevoflurane Induced Emergence Agitation
NCT02022488 COMPLETED PHASE4
Emergence Agitation of Sevoflurane in Pediatric
NCT06830564 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3