Effectiveness of an Evidence-based Stepped Care System for Alcohol and Other Drug Use Problems Among Congolese Refugees in Zambia

NCT ID: NCT05471921

Last Updated: 2025-11-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-26

Study Completion Date

2025-02-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) stepped-care system in reducing unhealthy AOD use among Congolese refugees and the host community in Mantapala, an integrated settlement in northern Zambia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Refugees are at risk for unhealthy alcohol and other drug (AOD) use, particularly in protracted emergencies. The investigators define unhealthy AOD use as hazardous use, harmful use, and alcohol/substance use disorder and dependence. Among refugees, baseline risk for AOD use may increase for several reasons, including access to illicit substances (reduced drug enforcement policies and security), exposure to potentially traumatic events, and chronic adversity. Ongoing adverse environments such as refugee camps, are associated with lack of access to basic needs, limited livelihoods opportunities, boredom, marginalization, loss of resources, and mental health problems leading to the use of AOD as a coping mechanism. Studies have suggested that in conflict settings, quantity and frequency of use tend to increase from the pre-conflict stage to peri- and post-conflict. Increase in use of one substance can also lead to initiation of new substances, resulting in more complex cases of polysubstance use.

In Mantapala refugee settlement in Zambia, the proposed study setting, unhealthy AOD use is reportedly common. In July 2019, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) requested psychiatric clinical officers from local health facilities in Nchelenge, Zambia to do an assessment of mental health problems among refugees in Mantapala. The community-based convenience sample consisted of 200 people, of whom 35 (18%) had probable alcohol use disorder, mostly adult men and adolescents (male and female), and frequent cannabis use among people who were drinking alcohol. Reports from 7 refugee incentive workers and 17 representatives from 6 implementing agencies during an initial site visit indicated that unhealthy AOD use was associated with individual, family, and community consequences (injury, gender-based violence, diversion of livelihoods). Reports from the province of origin (Katanga, DRC) and host country (Zambia) have also found AOD use to be prevalent.

The proposed study will test an intervention package known as 'screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment' (SBIRT). SBIRT systems are evidence-based for the treatment of unhealthy AOD use in non-humanitarian settings and can efficiently provide individuals with an appropriate level of care based on their symptom presentation and severity. For example, individuals with hazardous AOD use but without a more severe disorder and without mental health comorbidities may be best served by a brief intervention (BI); for many of these individuals, a full course of a psychotherapy may not be necessary (i.e., inefficient use of limited resources). On the other hand, individuals with more severe AOD disorder or mental health comorbidities likely require more comprehensive treatment. In this trial the investigators will provide BI or BI+psychotherapy commensurate with an individual's symptom presentation.

The interventions included in the SBIRT system are the Common Elements Treatment Approach-Brief Intervention (CETA-BI) and the full CETA psychotherapy (CETA). Previous randomized controlled trials have found CETA to be an effective treatment, including among refugees, for a range of mental and behavioral health problems, including depression, anxiety, trauma, and functional impairment. CETA has recently been tested in Zambia and found to also reduce unhealthy alcohol use in addition to mental health problems and intimate partner violence. CETA is a transdiagnostic approach, meaning that counselors trained in CETA are equipped with the ability to treat a range of co-occurring mental and behavioral health conditions. It was developed for use in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to facilitate lower cost and sustainability. CETA includes 9 cognitive behavioral elements found in most evidence-based psychological treatments. CETA is 6-12 weekly one-hour sessions with flexibility depending on symptom severity. CETA-BI combines motivational interviewing skills with cognitive behavioral therapy to assist clients in considering changing their rates of AOD use. The intervention lasts 30-40 minutes and consists of 6 components including: 1) screening; 2) identifying the impacts of unhealthy AOD use; 3) talking about change and goal-setting; 4) understanding the primary reason for drinking; 5) skill building; and 6) referral for services. CETA-BI and CETA were previously found effective for AOD use and mental health problems within HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia. CETA-BI and CETA have significant potential for adaptation and implementation in refugee settings but a rigorous RCT adapting and testing them in an SBIRT stepped-care approach among refugees is warranted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alcohol and Substance-Related Mental Disorders

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Alcohol Use Disorder Substance Use Disorders Depression Anxiety Trauma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Participants will be randomized to SBIRT or treatment as usual (TAU) control. The Research Assistant (RA) will allocate participants to study conditions using a series of sealed, opaque envelopes. RAs and data analysts will be blinded. Participants will be notified immediately about the result of the randomization.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SBIRT

Experimental condition: Participants residing in the study community (displaced and host population) will receive Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT). The treatment will consist of brief intervention (CETA-BI) and full Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) depending on the severity of the participant's substance use.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SBIRT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SBIRT is an evidence-based treatment for unhealthy alcohol and other drugs (AOD) use in non-humanitarian settings and can efficiently provide individuals with an appropriate level of care based on their symptoms. Participants randomized to SBIRT will receive an on-the-spot alcohol brief intervention (CETA-BI) and be categorized as low or moderate/high severity using the AUDIT scale. Participants who are moderate/high severity will be connected to a counselor and will begin full CETA treatment. CETA is a transdiagnostic approach that combines motivational interviewing with cognitive behavioral therapy to assist clients in considering changing their rates of AOD use. The intervention lasts 30-40 minutes and consists of 6 components including 1) screening; 2) identifying the impacts of unhealthy AOD use; 3) talking about change/goal-setting; 4) understanding the primary reason for drinking; 5) skill-building; and 6) referral for services.

Treatment as usual

Comparison condition: Participants residing in the study community (displaced and host population) will receive the current standard of treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Treatment as usual

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mantapala health workers and supervisors were trained in mental health gap action program-humanitarian intervention guide (mhGAP-HIG), which is a mental health service provision guide for use in humanitarian settings; this training was led by staff from United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This training did not include evidence-based psychological interventions (e.g., CETA). Participants randomized to TAU will be referred to the existing services that exist in the health clinic located in Mantapala refugee settlement. More specialized services are referred to the District Hospital in Nchelenge.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SBIRT

SBIRT is an evidence-based treatment for unhealthy alcohol and other drugs (AOD) use in non-humanitarian settings and can efficiently provide individuals with an appropriate level of care based on their symptoms. Participants randomized to SBIRT will receive an on-the-spot alcohol brief intervention (CETA-BI) and be categorized as low or moderate/high severity using the AUDIT scale. Participants who are moderate/high severity will be connected to a counselor and will begin full CETA treatment. CETA is a transdiagnostic approach that combines motivational interviewing with cognitive behavioral therapy to assist clients in considering changing their rates of AOD use. The intervention lasts 30-40 minutes and consists of 6 components including 1) screening; 2) identifying the impacts of unhealthy AOD use; 3) talking about change/goal-setting; 4) understanding the primary reason for drinking; 5) skill-building; and 6) referral for services.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment as usual

Mantapala health workers and supervisors were trained in mental health gap action program-humanitarian intervention guide (mhGAP-HIG), which is a mental health service provision guide for use in humanitarian settings; this training was led by staff from United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. This training did not include evidence-based psychological interventions (e.g., CETA). Participants randomized to TAU will be referred to the existing services that exist in the health clinic located in Mantapala refugee settlement. More specialized services are referred to the District Hospital in Nchelenge.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Living in Mantapala refugee settlement (i.e., Congolese refugee) or (Zambian) member of neighboring host community
* Unhealthy alcohol use based on standard cut-off scores of the ACASI-based Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)20 (≥ 8 for men and ≥ 4 for women).21 The focus on unhealthy alcohol use as the primary inclusion criterion is due to preliminary research in Mantapala suggesting that alcohol is the main substance of concern and other drug use almost exclusively co-occurs with alcohol use.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe psychiatric illness, high suicide risk (based on recent attempts and/or ideation with intent and plan), and/or current severe AOD withdrawal that would necessitate immediate referral for psychiatric services
* Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elrha

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeremy C. Kane

Assistant Professor of Epidemiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy Kane, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Claire Greene, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Muzi Kamanga

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women in Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF)

Henry Loongo, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CARE Zambia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mantapala Refugee Settlement

Nchelenge, Luapula Province, Zambia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Zambia

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAU0532

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id