Trial Outcomes & Findings for IMAS Optimization and Applicability in Acute and Subacute Stroke. (NCT NCT05469438)

NCT ID: NCT05469438

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Results Overview

The coefficient of determination (R²) quantifies how well the predictive model explains variance in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity recovery scores. This unitless measure ranges from -∞ to 1, with higher values indicating better model fit (i.e. better prediction). Additional Detail: A sensor suite assessed movement kinematics (e.g., time, position, velocity), and software predicted recovery from baseline characteristics. We report R² for the best-performing model predicting end-of-study FM score from day-one FM score, using leave-one-out cross-validation (\~24 degrees of freedom). Models with fewer degrees of freedom may yield lower R² due to overfitting control.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

30 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 - 8 weeks post acute stroke onset

Results posted on

2025-12-02

Participant Flow

38 consented, 8 did not meet eligibility, and 30 were enrolled and started.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Single Arm
Single Arm Stroke Study
Overall Study
STARTED
30
Overall Study
COMPLETED
30
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

IMAS Optimization and Applicability in Acute and Subacute Stroke.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Single Arm Stroke Study
n=30 Participants
30 Acute or Sub Acute Stroke Patients
Age, Continuous
61.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62 • n=121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
n=121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants
n=121 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
n=121 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=121 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=121 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=121 Participants
Fugl-Meyer
45.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=121 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 - 8 weeks post acute stroke onset

Population: Patients with stroke

The coefficient of determination (R²) quantifies how well the predictive model explains variance in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity recovery scores. This unitless measure ranges from -∞ to 1, with higher values indicating better model fit (i.e. better prediction). Additional Detail: A sensor suite assessed movement kinematics (e.g., time, position, velocity), and software predicted recovery from baseline characteristics. We report R² for the best-performing model predicting end-of-study FM score from day-one FM score, using leave-one-out cross-validation (\~24 degrees of freedom). Models with fewer degrees of freedom may yield lower R² due to overfitting control.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Arm
n=30 Participants
Single Arm- no intervention
Coefficient of Determination (R²) for Predicting Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Score Recovery Post-stroke.
0.9 Coefficient of determination (Unitless)

Adverse Events

Single Arm Stroke Study

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kylie Phillips (Clinical Research Regulatory Specialist III)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Case Western Reserve University)

Phone: (440)328-7964

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee There is a generic non-disclosure agreement about the IMAS technology.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER