Real-world Momentary Assessment of Kratom Use Accompanied by Product Assays: A Natural-history Study for Interdisciplinary Characterization of Kratom Use and Pharmacology
NCT ID: NCT05457803
Last Updated: 2025-07-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
396 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-20
2022-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mitragyna speciosa, also called kratom, is a plant used in Southeast Asia for its psychoactive effects. Its use has increased in the US, and an estimated 10 million adults may take it at least semiregularly. Most scientific research on human use of kratom has consisted of surveys in which people looked back on their experiences with it. Results from those surveys have been useful, but, like many behaviors, kratom use can be more fully understood if it is also studied as it happens. The technical term for this procedure is ecological momentary assessment (EMA). In EMA, people report their moods and activities in real time, a few times per day, usually with a smartphone app.
Objective:
This natural history study will collect data about how people use kratom and how it affects them.
Eligibility:
People aged 18 and older who use kratom 3 or more times per week
Design:
Most participants will be remote only.
They will fill out an online consent form. They will also answer an initial set of questions about their kratom use.
They will download an app on their smartphones for EMA (described above). They will use this app to answer short sets of questions for 15 days in a row about their ongoing behaviors and moods, including kratom use.
They will use a prepaid envelope to mail in a sample of their kratom product.
Some participants, after doing the EMA part of the study, can also come to a clinic. They will have 1 visit for informed consent (1-3 hours) and 1 visit for a monitoring session (8 hours) where we can directly assess the effects of their usual dose of kratom. They will bring their kratom produce with them to take on site.
Before they take the kratom, they will have a physical exam. They will have blood and urine tests. They will answer questions about their sleep, driving, and general feelings. They will complete tasks on a computer to measure their reflexes and response times. Their driving performance will be assessed in a simulator.
Researchers will watch participants consume their kratom. A sample of their product will be taken for analysis.
After taking their kratom, those participants will repeat some questionnaires and tests, including the driving simulation. They will also be interviewed about their use of kratom....
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-marketing Safety Surveillance of Compound Kuh-seng Injection: a Registry Study
NCT02239237
Herbal Extract Study
NCT02095301
Standardized Eucommia Extract in the Treatment of Hypertension
NCT00626132
Screening Herbs for Drug Interactions
NCT00029263
Pilot Evaluation of CVT-E002 in Pediatric Upper Respiratory Tract Infection.
NCT00255307
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our natural-history study will build on preliminary research on the use and effects of kratom. We propose to examine momentary reasons for and self-reported effects of kratom-product use in daily life, associations of these findings with product alkaloid content and, in a direct-observation setting, externally observable effects of kratom-product use.
In the Main EMA Study, to be conducted nationwide via online/mobile data collection, we will examine instances of kratom use in naturalistic settings using EMA, and we will characterize the alkaloid content of the products used. The target sample size is 240 completers.
In the In-person Substudy, 10 participants who reside near the NIDA IRP will conduct the same activities as in the Main EMA Study (online questionnaires, then EMA for 15 days), plus a one-day outpatient session. On the session day, we will collect physiological and task-derived measures (these will include a driving-simulation task) after the participants have taken their regular kratom product dose. This will be followed by semi-structured narrative qualitative interviews.
Objectives for the Main EMA Study:
Primary objective: to collect momentary assessments of individual instances of kratom use and effects associated with use (e.g., sleep duration, mood, motivations for use, acute effects, etc.) in daily life over 15 days among regular kratom users, for better understanding kratom use in real-world contexts and in real time.
Secondary objective: to determine associations of momentary responses with directly assayed content of samples of participants kratom products.
Exploratory objectives: to evaluate whether retrospective self-report on cross-sectional questionnaires completed prior to EMA correlate with momentary self-report (e.g., do people who report using kratom primarily for pain actually report self-treatment of pain symptoms as a proximal motivation?). A second exploratory objective is to determine whether there are subgroups of participants who share distinct patterns of kratom use.
Objectives for the In-Person Substudy:
Primary objective: to evaluate the relationships among subjective self-reported kratom effects (measured over 3 hours post-dosing), the kratom product used, and kratom alkaloid concentrations in biospecimens.
Secondary objective: to gather comprehensive narrative case-report data via qualitative interviewing.
Exploratory objectives include: First, to assess vital signs, pupil size, and psychomotor performance of participants prior to their taking their regular kratom dose and at repeated intervals subsequent to their taking their regular kratom product dose (4-6 total time points). Second, to measure signs of opioid withdrawal among participants prior to their taking their regular kratom dose and after (4 total time points). Third, to measure participants performance on a driving simulation before they have taken their kratom dose and after they have taken their kratom dose (2 time points total).
Endpoints for Main EMA Study:
For primary objectives: proximal motivations for use; somatic and psychoactive effects reported from use; associations between self-reported states (e.g., mood, pain, craving), and particular kratom product types reported as being used; associations between self-reported states (e.g., mood, pain, craving) and kratom dose.
For secondary objectives: quantification of up to 14 kratom alkaloids; differences in alkaloid content by kratom product type (e.g., extract, raw plant matter); differences in alkaloid content by kratom vendor type (e.g., small online vendor, large-scale importer and distributor; between-person correlations (self-reported momentary effects and alkaloid levels).
For exploratory objectives: correlation of cross-sectional self-reported kratom use motivations and momentary (proximate) kratom use motivations; Cluster analysis of kratom use patterns.
Endpoints for In-person Substudy:
For primary objectives: Concentrations of detectable kratom alkaloids and their metabolites in human plasma and urine; differences in concentrations by kratom product type (e.g., extract, raw plant matter); Addiction Research Center Inventory and other self-report questionnaires.
For secondary objective: narrative case report series documenting participant s kratom use, from initiation to present day.
For exploratory objectives: Psychomotor performance; Resting vitals; Pupil size; Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale; Driving-simulation performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In-persom kratom users
10 subjects that use kratom an additional cross-sectional evaluation: one session day at the NIDA IRP preceded by a consent session day; 2 visits at our BRC building total.
No interventions assigned to this group
Online kratom users
240 subjects that use kratom, prospective observational cohort study in which each participant provides intensive longitudinal data on kratom use for 15 consecutive days via smartphone app
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Regular kratom use.
* Passing data validity checks on the online screening questionnaire.
* Reporting ownership of a smartphone.
* Age \>= 18 years.
* Currently residing in the US .
* Willingness to complete all study activities as described in the online study preamble and informed consent, including willingness to provide a small sample of their kratom product.
* Passing online Main Study consent quiz with at least 8/10 correct answers.
* English language proficiency.
* Not incarcerated.
Additional inclusion criterion for the In-person Substudy:
-Residing in or near MD.
Exclusion Criteria
* Missing data validity checks on screening questionnaire
* Decisionally impaired adults..
Additional exclusion criterion for the In-person Substudy:
* Pregnancy by urine test.
* Self-reported proneness to experiencing motion sickness or feelings of vertigo. This is a precaution, because motion sickness could interfere with the task or cause discomfort.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David H Epstein, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berthold EC, Kamble SH, Raju KS, King TI, Popa R, Sharma A, Leon F, Avery BA, McMahon LR, McCurdy CR. Preclinical pharmacokinetic study of speciociliatine, a kratom alkaloid, in rats using an UPLC-MS/MS method. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021 Feb 5;194:113778. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113778. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
Anwar M, Law R, Schier J. Notes from the Field: Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Exposures Reported to Poison Centers - United States, 2010-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(29):748-9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6529a4.
Babu KM, McCurdy CR, Boyer EW. Opioid receptors and legal highs: Salvia divinorum and Kratom. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Feb;46(2):146-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701241795.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
000910-DA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
10000910
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.