Trial Outcomes & Findings for Implementation of Digital Vital Sign Monitoring to Decrease Sleep Interruption and Enhance Recovery in Phase II of the PROmoting Sleep, Patient Engagement and Recovery (PROSPER) Project (NCT NCT05456360)
NCT ID: NCT05456360
Last Updated: 2024-12-18
Results Overview
Score Scales (0-100) 0-worst health/100 best health
TERMINATED
PHASE2/PHASE3
89 participants
through study completion, an average of 1 year
2024-12-18
Participant Flow
Between March 2023 and October 2023, we enrolled 89 patients. 52 patients were assigned to the control group, while 37 were assigned to the intervention group. The study was terminated due to insufficient staff and the inability to enroll an adequate number of patients. Consequently, we could not draw any conclusions.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard of Care
Vital Signs were monitor per standard of care
|
Intervention: Passive Vital Signs Monitoring
Vital Signs were monitor per PROSPER algorithm
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
52
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
36
|
28
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Implementation of Digital Vital Sign Monitoring to Decrease Sleep Interruption and Enhance Recovery in Phase II of the PROmoting Sleep, Patient Engagement and Recovery (PROSPER) Project
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard of Care
n=52 Participants
Vital Signs were monitor per standard of care
|
Intervention: Passive Vital Signs Monitoring
n=37 Participants
Vital Signs were monitor per PROSPER algorithm
|
Total
n=89 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
52 participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 participants
n=7 Participants
|
89 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 yearPopulation: Based on the feedback from the team it was unrealistic to complete the protocol in the estimated period due to lack of patient interest and engagement, data was not collected.
Score Scales (0-100) 0-worst health/100 best health
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Standard of Care
Intervention: Passive Vital Signs Monitoring
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Vijaya Gottumukkala
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place