Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel for Patients With Primary Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
NCT ID: NCT05449366
Last Updated: 2025-09-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2025-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standard Chemotherapy With of Without Axitinib in Malignant Mesothelioma
NCT01211275
Study of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraoperative Chemotherapy With Pemetrexed and Cisplatin for MPM
NCT02838745
Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, and Imatinib Mesylate in Malignant Mesothelioma
NCT00402766
Sintilimab, Bevacizumab, Pemetrexed, and Cisplatin for Unresectable MPeM
NCT06543069
Study of Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
NCT00251550
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As MPM very rarely disseminates outside the abdominal-cavity, the use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy seems a logical and promising step. This therapy can be delivered through an IP port-a-cath (PAC), and potentially has major advantages over systemic treatment. A higher, more effective dose of chemotherapy can directly be delivered at the site of disease, while systemic uptake is limited likely resulting in fewer toxicity. In rare cases where metastases do develop, a switch can be made to systemic treatment. By first applying local treatment, most patients will be spared a toxic and often ineffective systemic therapy. Another major advantage of the suggested approach is that ascites, a common MPM-symptom that causes major morbidity, can be drained through the same PAC-system. Paclitaxel is a well-known chemotherapeutic agent and is considered extremely favorable for IP use.
The aim of this study is to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of IP monotherapy with paclitaxel for patients with MPM, and to assess safety and feasibility of this strategy. The investigators will conduct a classic three-plus-three dose escalation study with three dose Three patients are initially enrolled into a given dose cohort. If there is no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observed in any of these patients, the trial proceeds to enroll additional patients to the next higher dose cohort. If one patient develops a DLT at a specific dose level, three additional subjects are enrolled into that same dose cohort. Development of a DLT in more than 1 patient in a specific dose cohort (≥33%) suggests that the MTD has been exceeded, and further dose escalation is not pursued. The previous dose is considered the MTD. When the MTD is found, an expansion of 3-6 more patients in that dose cohort will be performed, to achieve a total number of 9 patients treated at the MTD-level.
Patients undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) according to standard work-up for CRS-HIPEC. If the disease is considered not resectable, a peritoneal PAC will be placed during DLS. Through this PAC intraperitoneal paclitaxel will be administered weekly (dosage according to dose-escalation schedule). The number of cycles depends on toxicity and response to the treatment. The first response evaluation is scheduled after 8 cycles. There is no limit to the number of cycles, in case of continuing response to treatment. During the first and the fourth cycle, additional blood samples and IP-fluid samples will be collected for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment arm
According to standard of care work-up for CRS-HIPEC, patients will undergo diagnostic laparoscopy to determine the feasibility of complete cytoreduction with HIPEC. In case CRS-HIPEC is not considered feasible, a peritoneal port-a-cath (PAC) system will be placed. Through this PAC, 8-16 weekly cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy will be administered.
Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Solution (Ml)
Weekly cycles of intraperitoneal paclitaxel monotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Solution (Ml)
Weekly cycles of intraperitoneal paclitaxel monotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients that are not eligible (or willing) to undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Written informed consent according to the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and national/local regulations
* Patients must be ambulatory, i.e. World Health Organization-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (WHO-ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
* Ability to return to the Erasmus Medical Center for adequate follow-up as required by this protocol
* Patients must have normal organ function and adequate bone marrow reserve as assessed by the following laboratory requirements; absolute neutrophil count \>1.5 \* 10\^9/l, platelet count \>100\*10\^9/l and Hemoglobin \>6.0mmol /l. Patients must have a Bilirubin \<1½ x upper limit of normal (ULN), Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<2.5 x ULN
Exclusion Criteria
* Medical or psychological impediment to probable compliance with the protocol
* Serious concomitant disease or active infections
* History of auto-immune disease or organ allografts, or with active or chronic infection, including HIV and viral hepatitis
* Serious intercurrent chronic or acute illness such as pulmonary (COPD or asthma) or cardiac (NYHA class III or IV) or hepatic disease or other illness considered by the study coordinator to constitute an unwarranted high risk for participation in this study
* Pregnant or lactating women; for all women of child-bearing potential a negative urine pregnancy test will be required as well as the willingness to use adequate contraception during the study until 4 weeks after finishing treatment
* Absence of assurance of compliance with the protocol
* An organic brain syndrome or other significant psychiatric abnormality which would comprise the ability to give informed consent, and preclude participation in the full protocol and follow-up
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
E.V.E. Madsen
Principal Investigator (MD PhD)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-003637-11
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL78373.078.21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.