Trial Outcomes & Findings for CARE FOR ALL:an Evaluation of an Asthma QIP (NCT NCT05440097)

NCT ID: NCT05440097

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Results Overview

Change from baseline in the proportion of patients with an ICS-based maintenance and/or reliever treatment at week 48 was performed using mixed effect logistic regression model.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

1500 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to week 48

Results posted on

2026-01-02

Participant Flow

This single-arm study assessed a hospital-level Quality Improvement Program (QIP) in 31 Chinese hospitals (29 Jul 2022 - 03 Sep 2024). The QIP was a standardized GINA 2021 guideline education intervention delivered to 282 engaged pulmonologists. Participant Population (Outcome Assessors): Consecutive asthma patients from these hospitals were screened; 1,536 were screened and 1,500 were enrolled to be managed by the trained pulmonologists.

For Pulmonologists: All participating pulmonologists from the 31 hospitals received the QIP intervention. There was no control group of pulmonologists .Baseline data were not collected for Pulmonologists. For Patients: All enrolled patients were managed by pulmonologists who had received the QIP. Patients were not randomized to different treatment strategies; the study aimed to observe the change in their outcomes before and after their physicians received the QIP.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Total
Total of all participants
Overall Study
STARTED
1500
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
1362
Overall Study
COMPLETED
1271
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
229

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Total
Total of all participants
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
154
Overall Study
Death
2
Overall Study
Physician Decision
2
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
56
Overall Study
Include "enrolled by mistake" and "withdrawed by mistake".
15

Baseline Characteristics

CARE FOR ALL:an Evaluation of an Asthma QIP

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Total
n=1362 Participants
Total of all participants
Age, Continuous
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19 • n=228 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
800 Participants
n=228 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
562 Participants
n=228 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=228 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1362 Participants
n=228 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=228 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to week 48

Population: All successfully enrolled participating patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks and returned to recruiting hospital for study visits every 12 weeks.

Change from baseline in the proportion of patients with an ICS-based maintenance and/or reliever treatment at week 48 was performed using mixed effect logistic regression model.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Full Analysis Set
n=1362 Participants
All enrolled participants with at least one non-missing post-intervention GINA treatment assessment were enrolled into FAS.
Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment
Baseline
571 Participants
Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment
Week 48
723 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

Population: All successfully enrolled participating patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks and returned to recruiting hospital for study visits every 12 weeks.

The Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) is a shortened version of the full 7-item ACQ (Juniper et al 1999) that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time awakening, symptoms on awakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, and wheezing). Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-5 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well controlled asthma, 0.75-1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Full Analysis Set
n=1362 Participants
All enrolled participants with at least one non-missing post-intervention GINA treatment assessment were enrolled into FAS.
Secondary Endpoint 1- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With Well-controlled Asthma (ACQ-5 ≤ 0.75) at Week 48
Baseline
354 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 1- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With Well-controlled Asthma (ACQ-5 ≤ 0.75) at Week 48
Week 48
641 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 12, 24, 36 and 48

Population: All successfully enrolled participating patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks and returned to recruiting hospital for study visits every 12 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Full Analysis Set
n=1362 Participants
All enrolled participants with at least one non-missing post-intervention GINA treatment assessment were enrolled into FAS.
Secondary Endpoint 2- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients on the Treatment of ICS-formoterol as Reliever at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Baseline
2 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 2- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients on the Treatment of ICS-formoterol as Reliever at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 12
15 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 2- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients on the Treatment of ICS-formoterol as Reliever at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 24
12 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 2- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients on the Treatment of ICS-formoterol as Reliever at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 36
64 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 2- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Patients on the Treatment of ICS-formoterol as Reliever at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 48
84 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 12, 24, 36 and 48

Population: All successfully enrolled participating patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks and returned to recruiting hospital for study visits every 12 weeks.

The Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) is a shortened version of the full 7-item ACQ (Juniper et al 1999) that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time awakening, symptoms on awakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, and wheezing). Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-5 score is the mean of the responses.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Full Analysis Set
n=1362 Participants
All enrolled participants with at least one non-missing post-intervention GINA treatment assessment were enrolled into FAS.
Secondary Endpoint 3- Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Average Score at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 12
-0.59 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132
Secondary Endpoint 3- Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Average Score at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 24
-0.65 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.168
Secondary Endpoint 3- Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Average Score at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 36
-0.61 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.142
Secondary Endpoint 3- Change From Baseline in ACQ-5 Average Score at Week 12, 24, 36 and 48
Week 48
-0.71 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, week 12, 24 and 36

Population: All successfully enrolled participating patients were followed up for up to 48 weeks and returned to recruiting hospital for study visits every 12 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Full Analysis Set
n=1362 Participants
All enrolled participants with at least one non-missing post-intervention GINA treatment assessment were enrolled into FAS.
Secondary Endpoint 4- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment at Week 12, 24 and 36
Baseline
571 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 4- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment at Week 12, 24 and 36
Week 12
677 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 4- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment at Week 12, 24 and 36
Week 24
577 Participants
Secondary Endpoint 4- Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Participants With an ICS-based Maintenance and/or Reliever Treatment at Week 12, 24 and 36
Week 36
590 Participants

Adverse Events

Total

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Clinical project manager

AstraZeneca

Phone: 18500554074

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60