Soleus Loading Response During Walking

NCT ID: NCT05436366

Last Updated: 2024-11-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-30

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke survivors experience motor deficits, weak voluntary muscle activations, and low weight-bearing capacity that impair ambulation. Restoring motor function is a priority for people post-stroke, whose gait patterns are slow, and metabolically inefficient. The role of the ankle is crucial for locomotion because it stores mechanical energy throughout the stance phase, leading to a large activation of plantarflexor muscles during push-off for propulsion.

After a stroke, paretic plantarflexors undergo changes in their mechanics and activation patterns that yield diminished ankle power, propulsion, and gait speed. Recovery of lost plantarflexor function can increase propulsion and mitigate unnatural gait compensations that occur during hemiparetic walking.

In the stance phase, dorsiflexion is imposed at the ankle and the plantarflexors are loaded, which results in excitation of group Ia and II afferents, and group Ib afferents. Load sensing Ib afferents are active in mid-late stance, and through spinal excitatory pathways, reinforces the activation of plantarflexors and propulsive force generation at the ankle. Targeting the excitability of the load sensitive Ib excitatory pathway, propulsive soleus activity and resulting force generation (and thereby gait speed) can be improved after stroke.

The long-term research goal is to develop a novel hybrid gait paradigm integrating operant conditioning and powered wearable devices to advance neuro-behavioral training and enhance locomotor ability after stroke. The overall objectives are to 1) modulate the soleus muscle loading response within the stance phase, and 2) develop a dynamic protocol to operantly condition the soleus response in stroke survivors. The central hypothesis is that enhancing the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase through operant up-conditioning can increase plantarflexor power and forward propulsion after stroke.

In working towards attaining the research objective and testing the central hypothesis, the objective of this pilot study is to modulate the soleus loading response in the stance phase during treadmill walking. The specific aims in this study are to 1) apply ankle perturbations in mid-late stance phase combining a control algorithm and a powered device to characterize the changes in soleus EMG between perturbed and unperturbed (i.e., when no perturbations are applied) step cycles in 15 able-bodied individuals; and 2) determine the feasibility of the wearable ankle device and its algorithm in 5 participants with hemiparesis and gait deficits due to a stroke. The testing of the device and its algorithm will provide foundational evidence to adjust the soleus stimuli continuously and reliably, and develop the new walking operant conditioning protocol for stroke survivors.

An expected outcome in this pilot is to lay the groundwork to develop the soleus up-conditioning protocol as a potential strategy to improve paretic leg function. If successfully developed, this new protocol proposed in a subsequent study will be the first neurobehavioral training method that targets spinal load-sensitive pathways to improve ankle plantarflexor power and forward propulsion after stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants are assigned to a single group in this basic science study. The protocol includes testing a wearable powered ankle device and its control algorithm during treadmill walking. The robotic ankle device is attached to the participant's calf and foot using a plastic ankle-foot orthosis and Velcro straps. The robotic ankle device will be worn on the impaired side while the contralateral side is free during walking. The participant places the foot (hemiparetic side) onto the robotic ankle device using the custom orthotic frame. The mechanical joint of the device is aligned with the participant's ankle joint center. A strap looped around the circumference of the shank attaches the participant's leg to the ankle device to ensure that the mechanical joint rotates the ankle joint. The fit should not be uncomfortably tight, but tight enough to prevent relative (unwanted) displacement. Cables are connected to a pair of electric motors that apply torque in the plantarflexion and dorsiflexion direction. The device collects measurements of the joint angle. The motors are regulated using the ankle joint angle such that the robotic device applies ankle rotation perturbations to induce changes in the soleus muscle activity. The ankle device integrates pressure sensors placed underneath the sole of the foot at the heel and toe to collect vertical ground reaction forces.

Electromyographic (EMG) sensors are placed on the soleus and tibialis anterior muscle groups. EMG sensors are glued using a biocompatible tape to affix the sensors to the skin. EMG activity is amplified, band-pass filtered (10-1000 Hz), sampled at 3,000 Hz, and stored. A study member will be available to assist participants to place the EMG sensors. Heart rate and blood pressure are monitored prior at the beginning of the protocol. Ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics are recorded bilaterally using wearable electro-goniometers. Participants wear a safety harness which is attached to a portable system (overhead track and tripod) to prevent falling without restricting motion. An emergency stop button is available for participants to immediately halt the experiment. Participants can verbally request the staff to press the emergency stop button.

Participants walk at a self-selected comfortable fast speed (e.g., 3.5-4 km/h) during short bouts of treadmill walking (4-6 minutes per bout). The treadmill is controlled externally by a computer to adjust the speed of the belt. The gait session is expected to last about 60-90 minutes to avoid fatigue and time-varying changes in the muscle responses. During warm-up, the plantarflexor maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) is collected in a standing position, and gait kinematics, muscle EMG and ground reaction forces are recorded walking without wearing the robotic ankle device.

Following warm-up, while walking on the treadmill wearing the robotic device, ankle rotations will be applied using the developed algorithm to evoke the soleus loading response during the mid-late stance phase. The control algorithm applies ankle perturbations, which are shifts from the natural ankle kinematics to target the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase every other 4-6 gait cycles to prevent habituation. Perturbation magnitude, speed, and timing are controlled during treadmill walking. Due to the unique parameters of the perturbation (magnitude and speed) applied by the device, there is minimal fall risk because it is applied for a short duration in the stance phase to evoke a muscle response (e.g., it is analogous to a mechanical stretch reflex). Hence, the perturbation is not applied to guide or assist the ankle motion, which will have a major influence in the gait kinematics. Outside of the window of perturbation within stance, the ankle control is turned off.

For any step cycle, only two conditions are possible. Either the participant is in a perturbed or unperturbed condition. During perturbed step cycles, the participant is wearing the ankle device and it applies force to change the ankle-foot motion (i.e., the device is activated). During unperturbed step cycles, the participant is wearing the ankle device, but it does not apply force to change the ankle-foot motion (i.e., the device is passive and not active).

A gait session consists of 4-5 walking bouts interleaving perturbed and unperturbed walking steps (until collecting data of about 30 perturbed and unperturbed steps per walking bout) leaving at least one unperturbed step before a perturbed step. Rest breaks are provided in between bouts.

The study team will continuously monitor the participant during a gait session and verbally request feedback to ensure the participant's comfort and safety. Automatic and manual software safeguards are placed to stop the session if the performance exceeds safe/desired speed or torque ranges. The gait session is finished with a cool down to measure joint kinematics, muscle EMG, and propulsion walking without wearing the device. At the end of the experiments, the wearable sensors will be gently removed from the body. The study staff will help the participant to take off the ankle device.

The study involves a single group enrolling 15 individuals with no known neurological conditions or history of orthopedic injuries. Changes in the soleus EMG will be compared between perturbed and unperturbed walking steps during a gait session. For the primary measure (soleus EMG response), the difference between the non-perturbed and perturbed EMG will be assessed by Student's t-test The sample size for able-bodied individuals allows us to estimate, with a two-sided 95% confidence level each, the soleus EMG response to perturbation within a margin of error of 5.4% non-perturbed EMG. This calculation is based on a previous study, where a group analysis with a s.d. of 0.87% change (% non-perturbed EMG) was observed in the soleus EMG in response to 1 deg/s joint motion perturbation during the mid-late stance phase (i.e., the variation in the soleus EMG is linearly related to the velocity and/or amplitude of the perturbations). A similar s.d. is assumed for the proposed study, which yields a sample size of N=15 able-bodied individuals. In addition, a sample size of 5 participants with hemiparesis and gait deficits due to a stroke will be studied to examine the feasibility of the proposed algorithms and device to evoke the soleus loading response. Due to the lack of availability of data with post-stroke participants, s.d. change % unperturbed soleus EMG cannot be defined prior to conducting testing with individuals after stroke. Hence, this pilot study will provide preliminary results to characterize the soleus EMG due to the applied perturbations in people post-stroke.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Spastic Hemiparesis Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single arm
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Soleus Loading Response Experimental

Participants in this one arm will be administered the soleus loading response protocol by applying an ankle joint rotation during treadmill walking

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Soleus loading response in able-bodied participants

Intervention Type DEVICE

Able-bodied participants are enrolled. The robotic ankle device applies ankle joint rotations using a computer-controlled closed-loop algorithm to evoke the soleus loading response during the mid-late stance phase during treadmill walking at a self-selected comfortable fast speed. The algorithm applies ankle perturbations, which are shifts from the natural ankle kinematics to target the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase every other 4-6 gait cycles. The perturbation magnitude, speed, and timing are controlled by the device to adjust the participant's soleus response. Four-to-five walking bouts are conducted interleaving perturbed and unperturbed walking steps (until collecting data of about 30 perturbed and unperturbed steps per walking bout) leaving at least one unperturbed step before a perturbed step. Changes in the soleus EMG will be compared between perturbed and unperturbed walking steps.

Soleus loading response in participants with hemiparesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants with spastic hemiparesis due to a stroke are enrolled. The robotic ankle device applies ankle joint rotations using a computer-controlled closed-loop algorithm to evoke the soleus loading response during the mid-late stance phase during treadmill walking at a self-selected comfortable fast speed. The algorithm applies ankle perturbations, which are shifts from the natural ankle kinematics to target the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase every other 4-6 gait cycles. The perturbation magnitude, speed, and timing are controlled by the device to adjust the participant's soleus response. Four-to-five walking bouts are conducted interleaving perturbed and unperturbed walking steps (until collecting data of about 30 perturbed and unperturbed steps per walking bout) leaving at least one unperturbed step before a perturbed step. Changes in the soleus EMG will be compared between perturbed and unperturbed walking steps.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Soleus loading response in able-bodied participants

Able-bodied participants are enrolled. The robotic ankle device applies ankle joint rotations using a computer-controlled closed-loop algorithm to evoke the soleus loading response during the mid-late stance phase during treadmill walking at a self-selected comfortable fast speed. The algorithm applies ankle perturbations, which are shifts from the natural ankle kinematics to target the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase every other 4-6 gait cycles. The perturbation magnitude, speed, and timing are controlled by the device to adjust the participant's soleus response. Four-to-five walking bouts are conducted interleaving perturbed and unperturbed walking steps (until collecting data of about 30 perturbed and unperturbed steps per walking bout) leaving at least one unperturbed step before a perturbed step. Changes in the soleus EMG will be compared between perturbed and unperturbed walking steps.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Soleus loading response in participants with hemiparesis

Participants with spastic hemiparesis due to a stroke are enrolled. The robotic ankle device applies ankle joint rotations using a computer-controlled closed-loop algorithm to evoke the soleus loading response during the mid-late stance phase during treadmill walking at a self-selected comfortable fast speed. The algorithm applies ankle perturbations, which are shifts from the natural ankle kinematics to target the soleus loading response in mid-late stance phase every other 4-6 gait cycles. The perturbation magnitude, speed, and timing are controlled by the device to adjust the participant's soleus response. Four-to-five walking bouts are conducted interleaving perturbed and unperturbed walking steps (until collecting data of about 30 perturbed and unperturbed steps per walking bout) leaving at least one unperturbed step before a perturbed step. Changes in the soleus EMG will be compared between perturbed and unperturbed walking steps.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For able-bodied individuals, the inclusion criterion is adults with no known neurological conditions or history of orthopedic injuries.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Victor H. Duenas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Victor H. Duenas

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victor H Duenas, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Syracuse University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Syracuse University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P2CHD086844

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

SU-22-026

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id