Trial Outcomes & Findings for Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) (NCT NCT05431686)
NCT ID: NCT05431686
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Results Overview
For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
18 months
2025-12-22
Participant Flow
all participants are assigned to a single SMA visit intervention arm
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
unable to schedule
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver. Baseline characteristic data was collected for youth, not from caregivers.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
4 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Inclusion criteria: ages 8-12 years, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or Latinx, publicly insured, insulin pump naïve, recent HbA1c \>8%
Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=82 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: SMA intervention participants
For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.
|
87.5 percentage of 14 day CGM wear
Interval 80.1 to 92.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsFor those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.
|
90 percentage of visits attended
Interval 80.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: 2 youth-caregiver dyads participated in semi-structured interviews
Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=2 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data
Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data
Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are in range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
9 months
|
29.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
12 months
|
33.33 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
15 months
|
38.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
18 months
|
27.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 9.17
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
Baseline
|
27.25 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
3 months
|
21.75 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
6 months
|
23.67 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 3.79
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are below range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
Baseline
|
2.45 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
3 months
|
0.97 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
6 months
|
4.00 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 4.58
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
9 months
|
2.00 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
12 months
|
1.60 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
15 months
|
2.50 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
18 months
|
1.67 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are above range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
12 months
|
61.33 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 20.03
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
15 months
|
60.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 4.24
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
18 months
|
71.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
baseline
|
78.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 15.62
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
3 months
|
80.77 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
6 months
|
72.33 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
9 months
|
69.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in the mean sensor glucose values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
baseline
|
247.75 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 17.75
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
3 months
|
259.25 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 35.51
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
6 months
|
245.33 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 13.05
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
9 months
|
241.50 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 3.54
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
12 months
|
239.00 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 30.51
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
15 months
|
219.67 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 15.82
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
18 months
|
256.67 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 47.51
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in the coefficient of variation values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
baseline
|
41.40 percentage
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
3 months
|
30.80 percentage
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
6 months
|
41.47 percentage
Standard Deviation 12.52
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
9 months
|
42.30 percentage
Standard Deviation 4.67
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
12 months
|
43.30 percentage
Standard Deviation 9.36
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
15 months
|
44.85 percentage
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
18 months
|
39.40 percentage
Standard Deviation 5.63
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in percent CGM wear time within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
baseline
|
63.40 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 16.75
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
3 months
|
67.33 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 19.79
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
6 months
|
64.33 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 44.84
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
9 months
|
89.50 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
12 months
|
74.00 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 27.07
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
15 months
|
71.13 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 18.80
|
—
|
|
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
18 months
|
65.90 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 23.08
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in number of episodes of DKA since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
18 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
12 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
15 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
baseline
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
3 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
6 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
9 months
|
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in number of episodes of severe hypoglycemia since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
baseline
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
3 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
6 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
9 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
12 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
15 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
18 months
|
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in number of episodes of emergency room visits since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
baseline
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
3 months
|
0.5 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
6 months
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
9 months
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
12 months
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
15 months
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Emergency Room Visits
18 months
|
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in number of hospital admissions since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
baseline
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
3 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
6 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
9 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
12 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
15 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
|
Number of Hospital Admissions
18 months
|
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
We will look at differences in HbA1c at study visits within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
baseline
|
11.28 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
3 months
|
10.60 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
6 months
|
10.47 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
9 months
|
9.35 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
12 months
|
9.67 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
15 months
|
10.70 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
18 months
|
10.70 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
The T1DAL is a validated survey assessing diabetes specific quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater quality of life. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
baseline
|
67.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.91
|
74.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.39
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
3 months
|
66.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.44
|
72.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.01
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
6 months
|
68.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.26
|
76.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.65
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
9 months
|
69.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.04
|
75.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.83
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
12 months
|
63.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.69
|
74.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.01
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
15 months
|
59.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
77.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.25
|
|
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
18 months
|
62.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
75.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
The DSMP is a validated survey assessing T1D adherence. Scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores reflecting better T1D management. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
baseline
|
47.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
42.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
3 months
|
37.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
65.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.46
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
6 months
|
33.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.39
|
38.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.66
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
9 months
|
42.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.32
|
42.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.80
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
12 months
|
40.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.41
|
44.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
15 months
|
30.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
|
37.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.38
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
18 months
|
38.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
42.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
The SED is a validated survey assessing diabetes-specific self-efficacy. Scores range from 0-4 for each question, with higher scores indicating increasing levels of child responsibility. The total scores can range from 0-100. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
baseline
|
45.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.64
|
70.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.17
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
3 months
|
65.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
68.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.22
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
6 months
|
53.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.08
|
65.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
9 months
|
57.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.87
|
63.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.09
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
12 months
|
70.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.68
|
69.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.91
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
15 months
|
73.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.74
|
72.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.33
|
|
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
18 months
|
68.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.19
|
67.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is widely used for measuring diabetes-related emotional distress. Scores range from 0-5 for each question, with higher scores indicating greater burden relating to having diabetes. The total scores can range from 0-80. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
baseline
|
50.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.96
|
59.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.38
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
3 months
|
50.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
64.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
6 months
|
27.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.0
|
67.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.72
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
9 months
|
44.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.07
|
60.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.41
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
12 months
|
48.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.74
|
64.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.88
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
15 months
|
49.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
|
65.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.75
|
|
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
18 months
|
47.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.58
|
61.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 monthsPopulation: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome
The CGM Benefits and Burdens scale is widely used for measuring perceptions of CGM benefit and burdens. Raw scores range from 1-5 for each question, with higher scores reflecting greater burdens/benefits. Total scores are scaled and combined, ranging from 0-200. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
|
|---|---|---|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
baseline
|
133.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 48.5
|
81.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.19
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
3 months
|
96.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.56
|
68.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.87
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
6 months
|
108.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
46.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.99
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
9 months
|
103.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.21
|
62.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.34
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
12 months
|
100.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.36
|
54.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.19
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
15 months
|
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
|
39.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
18 months
|
97.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.21
|
51.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.30
|
Adverse Events
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Youth
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregivers
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place