Trial Outcomes & Findings for Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) (NCT NCT05431686)

NCT ID: NCT05431686

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Results Overview

For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

14 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

18 months

Results posted on

2025-12-22

Participant Flow

all participants are assigned to a single SMA visit intervention arm

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
Overall Study
STARTED
14
Overall Study
COMPLETED
4
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
Overall Study
unable to schedule
10

Baseline Characteristics

Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver. Baseline characteristic data was collected for youth, not from caregivers.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
4 Participants
n=18 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=18 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: Inclusion criteria: ages 8-12 years, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or Latinx, publicly insured, insulin pump naïve, recent HbA1c \>8%

Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=82 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate
14 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: SMA intervention participants

For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.
87.5 percentage of 14 day CGM wear
Interval 80.1 to 92.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

For those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.
90 percentage of visits attended
Interval 80.0 to 100.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: 2 youth-caregiver dyads participated in semi-structured interviews

Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=2 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.
2 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data

Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: user satisfaction ratings were not collected given the small study sample population, instead, semi-structured interviews were performed to collect acceptability data

Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are in range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
9 months
29.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 5.66
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
12 months
33.33 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 8.33
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
15 months
38.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 3.61
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
18 months
27.00 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 9.17
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
Baseline
27.25 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 1.71
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
3 months
21.75 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 10.56
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
6 months
23.67 percentage of time
Standard Deviation 3.79

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are below range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
Baseline
2.45 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.73
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
3 months
0.97 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.00
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
6 months
4.00 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 4.58
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
9 months
2.00 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 0.00
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
12 months
1.60 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 1.47
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
15 months
2.50 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 0.71
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
18 months
1.67 percentage of time below range
Standard Deviation 2.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in the percent of time that blood sugar values are above range within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
12 months
61.33 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 20.03
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
15 months
60.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 4.24
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
18 months
71.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 11.53
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
baseline
78.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 15.62
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
3 months
80.77 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 10.51
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
6 months
72.33 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 8.33
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
9 months
69.00 percentage of time above range
Standard Deviation 5.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in the mean sensor glucose values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
baseline
247.75 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 17.75
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
3 months
259.25 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 35.51
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
6 months
245.33 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 13.05
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
9 months
241.50 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 3.54
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
12 months
239.00 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 30.51
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
15 months
219.67 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 15.82
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
18 months
256.67 mg/dl
Standard Deviation 47.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in the coefficient of variation values within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
baseline
41.40 percentage
Standard Deviation 7.38
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
3 months
30.80 percentage
Standard Deviation 7.75
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
6 months
41.47 percentage
Standard Deviation 12.52
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
9 months
42.30 percentage
Standard Deviation 4.67
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
12 months
43.30 percentage
Standard Deviation 9.36
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
15 months
44.85 percentage
Standard Deviation 3.61
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
18 months
39.40 percentage
Standard Deviation 5.63

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in percent CGM wear time within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
baseline
63.40 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 16.75
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
3 months
67.33 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 19.79
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
6 months
64.33 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 44.84
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
9 months
89.50 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 4.95
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
12 months
74.00 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 27.07
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
15 months
71.13 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 18.80
Continuous Glucose Monitor Wear Time
18 months
65.90 percentage of CGM wear time
Standard Deviation 23.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in number of episodes of DKA since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
18 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
12 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
15 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
baseline
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
3 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
6 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
9 months
0 DKA episodes
Standard Deviation 0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in number of episodes of severe hypoglycemia since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
baseline
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
3 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
6 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
9 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
12 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
15 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia
18 months
0 severe hypoglycemia episodes
Standard Deviation 0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in number of episodes of emergency room visits since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Number of Emergency Room Visits
baseline
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
3 months
0.5 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 1.0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
6 months
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
9 months
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
12 months
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
15 months
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Emergency Room Visits
18 months
0 emergency room visit episodes
Standard Deviation 0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in number of hospital admissions since the last study visit within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Number of Hospital Admissions
baseline
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
3 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
6 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
9 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
12 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
15 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0
Number of Hospital Admissions
18 months
0 hospital admissions
Standard Deviation 0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

We will look at differences in HbA1c at study visits within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Hemoglobin A1c
baseline
11.28 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.24
Hemoglobin A1c
3 months
10.60 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.26
Hemoglobin A1c
6 months
10.47 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 2.04
Hemoglobin A1c
9 months
9.35 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.64
Hemoglobin A1c
12 months
9.67 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 0.81
Hemoglobin A1c
15 months
10.70 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 2.46
Hemoglobin A1c
18 months
10.70 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

The T1DAL is a validated survey assessing diabetes specific quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater quality of life. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
baseline
67.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.91
74.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.39
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
3 months
66.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.44
72.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.01
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
6 months
68.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.26
76.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.65
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
9 months
69.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.04
75.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.83
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
12 months
63.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.69
74.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.01
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
15 months
59.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
77.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.25
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Survey
18 months
62.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
75.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.47

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

The DSMP is a validated survey assessing T1D adherence. Scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores reflecting better T1D management. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
baseline
47.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
42.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.42
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
3 months
37.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
65.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.46
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
6 months
33.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.39
38.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.66
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
9 months
42.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.32
42.64 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.80
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
12 months
40.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.41
44.19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
15 months
30.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.46
37.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.38
Diabetes Self-Management Profile (DSMP) Survey
18 months
38.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
42.15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

The SED is a validated survey assessing diabetes-specific self-efficacy. Scores range from 0-4 for each question, with higher scores indicating increasing levels of child responsibility. The total scores can range from 0-100. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
baseline
45.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.64
70.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.17
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
3 months
65.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
68.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.22
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
6 months
53.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.08
65.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
9 months
57.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.87
63.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.09
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
12 months
70.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.68
69.32 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.91
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
15 months
73.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.74
72.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.33
Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) Survey
18 months
68.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.19
67.05 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale is widely used for measuring diabetes-related emotional distress. Scores range from 0-5 for each question, with higher scores indicating greater burden relating to having diabetes. The total scores can range from 0-80. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
baseline
50.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.96
59.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.38
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
3 months
50.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
64.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
6 months
27.28 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.0
67.81 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.72
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
9 months
44.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.07
60.83 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.41
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
12 months
48.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.74
64.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.88
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
15 months
49.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
65.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.75
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale
18 months
47.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.58
61.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.79

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

Population: given the small sample size, there is not sufficient power to evaluate changes over time so statistical analysis was not performed for this outcome

The CGM Benefits and Burdens scale is widely used for measuring perceptions of CGM benefit and burdens. Raw scores range from 1-5 for each question, with higher scores reflecting greater burdens/benefits. Total scores are scaled and combined, ranging from 0-200. Surveys will be completed at each of the study visits, and scores will be compared within subject measures across the SMA intervention and during the follow up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SMA Visit Intervention Arm
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregiver
n=4 Participants
SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver SMA visits: SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
baseline
133.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 48.5
81.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.19
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
3 months
96.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.56
68.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.87
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
6 months
108.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
46.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.99
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
9 months
103.44 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.21
62.50 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.34
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
12 months
100.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.36
54.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.19
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
15 months
87.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
39.17 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
CGM Benefits and Burdens Scale
18 months
97.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.21
51.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.30

Adverse Events

SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Youth

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

SMA Visit Intervention Arm - Caregivers

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Jody Grundman

Children's National Hospital

Phone: 2024762121

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place