Comparison of Duodenoscope With Single-use Distal Cover and the Conventional Reusable Duodenoscope

NCT ID: NCT05429203

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

319 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-25

Study Completion Date

2024-07-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare the success rates of procedure success and complication rates in patients undergoing Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using two types of currently available endoscopes. These are (1) duodenoscope with a Single-use distal cover or (2) a conventional reusable duodenoscope.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The risks associated with the ERCP procedure will be explained to patients who meets the eligibility criteria. Consenting patients will be randomized to undergo Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using either (1) a duodenoscope with a Single-use distal cover or (2) a conventional reusable duodenoscope. Assessments will be made during, and immediately after the procedure, then patients will be called after 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the procedure to get information about adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Disease Pancreatic Disease Choledocholithiasis Biliary Obstruction Biliary Tract Neoplasms Pancreatic Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Duodenoscope with single-use distal cover

Patients will undergo ERCP using a duodenoscope with a single-use distal cover

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Duodenoscope with single-use distal cover

Intervention Type DEVICE

Newer duodenoscope with a single-use distal cover

Conventional Duodenoscope

Patients will undergo ERCP using a conventional duodenoscope

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional duodenoscope

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional duodenoscope with standard methods of reprocessing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Duodenoscope with single-use distal cover

Newer duodenoscope with a single-use distal cover

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional duodenoscope

Conventional duodenoscope with standard methods of reprocessing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing ERCP for biliary and pancreatic conditions
* Age \> 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Vulnerable patient groups including pregnant women
* Patients who are unable to consent
* Patients with known cholangitis
* Patients with known Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or any other multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) infection
* Surgically altered anatomy except for Billroth I
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Subhas Banerjee

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Subhas Banerjee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford hospital

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bang JY, Rosch T, Kim HM, Thakkar S, Robalino Gonzaga E, Tharian B, Inamdar S, Lee LS, Yachimski P, Jamidar P, Muniraj T, DiMaio C, Kumta N, Sethi A, Draganov P, Yang D, Seoud T, Perisetti A, Bondi G, Kirtane S, Hawes R, Wilcox CM, Kozarek R, Reddy DN, Varadarajulu S. Prospective evaluation of an assessment tool for technical performance of duodenoscopes. Dig Endosc. 2021 Jul;33(5):822-828. doi: 10.1111/den.13856. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33007136 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

65189

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gallbladder Stenting in FC-SEMS
NCT06820541 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA