Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility Evaluation of Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses Manufactured With an Alternative Hydration Process (NCT NCT05427539)
NCT ID: NCT05427539
Last Updated: 2023-10-02
Results Overview
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
Up to 1-Week Follow-up
2023-10-02
Participant Flow
A total of 66 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of those enrolled, 65 subjects were dispensed at least one study lens, while 1 subject failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 62 subjects completed the study while 3 subjects were discontinued.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration\Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration
Subjects randomized to receive the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with PG hydration during the first period and senofilcon A manufactured with IPA hydration during the second period.
|
Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration\Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration
Subjects randomized to receive the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with IPA hydration during the first period and senofilcon A manufactured with PG hydration during the second period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
31
|
34
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
29
|
33
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
29
|
33
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
29
|
33
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration\Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration
Subjects randomized to receive the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with PG hydration during the first period and senofilcon A manufactured with IPA hydration during the second period.
|
Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration\Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration
Subjects randomized to receive the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with IPA hydration during the first period and senofilcon A manufactured with PG hydration during the second period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
Unsatisfactory Lens Fitting due to Test Article
|
1
|
1
|
|
Period 1
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Feasibility Evaluation of Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses Manufactured With an Alternative Hydration Process
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total
n=65 Participants
Total Subjects
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.59 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: All subjects that were dispensed at least one study lens.
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 1-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration
n=128 eyes
Subjects that wore the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with PG hydration during either the first or second period of the study.
|
Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration
n=126 eyes
Subjects that wore the senofilcon A contact lenses manufactured with IPA hydration during either the first or second period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings
|
0 proportion of eyes
|
0 proportion of eyes
|
Adverse Events
Senofilcon A Manufactured With PG Hydration
Senofilcon A Manufactured With IPA Hydration
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Ben Straker
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (JJVC)
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place