Keeping on Course: A Communication-Focused Psychoeducational Program

NCT ID: NCT05423912

Last Updated: 2025-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-08

Study Completion Date

2025-12-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of Keeping on Course is to develop and test a psychoeducation program to provide dyads facing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with communication skills and strategies that will establish or restore a sense of agency as they cope with MCI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Up to 21% of older adults exhibit symptoms of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a term used to describe a compilation of cognitive and behavioral symptoms that approach but don't meet the threshold for a dementia diagnosis. Noticeably characterized by losses in executive function and memory that can affect critical life domains like employment, housing, health care, and finances, it is also a life condition of considerable indeterminacy both for the person living with the condition and for care partners. While many individuals experience worsened symptoms leading to an Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis within five years, MCI can be caused by a variety of disease processes making disease trajectory and prognosis vague and uncertain.

For most diagnosed with MCI, the experience is shared with another, typically a spouse or partner. In many cases, other members of the family, including fictive kin, are part of the team providing care and support - not only to the person living with MCI but to the principal caregiver, as well. For the dyad and both parties in an MCI couple individually, the period following an MCI diagnosis is often one of extended emotional turbulence and ambiguity. Care partner dyads coping with MCI face changes in role identity resulting in significant consequences for relationships, and the turbulence extends beyond the dyad to the larger extended family. It is unclear what the future might hold or how pervasively established patterns of living will be altered. The foundations of shared expectations and of trustworthy methods of planning, communication, and decision-making are disrupted in unpredictable ways. Emotional adjustment to MCI, unique for each dyad, has implications for subsequent family coping, psychological stress, physical fatigue, social isolation, decision-making, financial well-being, and more.

While MCI psychoeducation programs exist, they almost always target the person with MCI and not the patient-care partner dyad. Communication patterns between patients and care partners in oncology and HIV/AIDS settings are shown to influence the coping and care outcomes of dyads. With similar communication issues noted in MCI dyads, the goal of this pilot project is to develop and test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy and evaluate acceptability of a group program, Keeping on Course, to provide couples facing MCI with communication skills and interpersonal strategies that will establish or restore a sense of agency and emotional well-being as they navigate this period of transition and uncertainty.

This study uses a one-arm, pre/post design to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy in 4 cohorts of 6 MCI dyads each (for a total of 48 individuals) to take part in a trial of the Keeping on Course program. Participants meet in virtual intervention group meetings over the course of 6 consecutive weeks. Participants are asked to take part in structured quantitative interviews prior to the intervention and then 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are 24 dyads of persons with MCI and their care partners who experience the same intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Keeping on Course Program for Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Persons with MCI participating in the Keeping on Course program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Keeping on Course Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

MCI dyads engaging in the testing aim of the Keeping on Course Program take part in group meetings lasting 90 to 120 minutes over the course of 6 virtual meetings. Participants are asked to take part in structured quantitative interviews at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in a virtual, semi-structured 30-60 minute qualitative interview focused on their experiences in and perceptions of the intervention.

Keeping on Course Program for Care Partners of MCI Participants

Care partners participating in the Keeping on Course program with the MCI participant they care for.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Keeping on Course Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

MCI dyads engaging in the testing aim of the Keeping on Course Program take part in group meetings lasting 90 to 120 minutes over the course of 6 virtual meetings. Participants are asked to take part in structured quantitative interviews at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in a virtual, semi-structured 30-60 minute qualitative interview focused on their experiences in and perceptions of the intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Keeping on Course Program

MCI dyads engaging in the testing aim of the Keeping on Course Program take part in group meetings lasting 90 to 120 minutes over the course of 6 virtual meetings. Participants are asked to take part in structured quantitative interviews at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention. A subsample of participants will be invited to take part in a virtual, semi-structured 30-60 minute qualitative interview focused on their experiences in and perceptions of the intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Either a person with MCI, defined as a score of 23-27 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or a score of 19-25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or an MCI care partner
* Can read, speak, and understand English
* Have internet connectivity and a separate zoom-enabled device for each dyad member
* Dyads must live together, as this will provide sufficient opportunity for intervention homework and communication practice activities

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
* Individuals who are not able to clearly understand and speak English
* Those living with MCI will need to successfully complete a capacity to consent survey to be included in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory Roybal Center for Dementia Caregiving Mastery

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kenneth Hepburn

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Hepburn, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory Clinic at Executive Park

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P30AG064200

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00003645

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id