Delphi Study on Psychological Safety Competencies in Healthcare Training Curricula
NCT ID: NCT05422872
Last Updated: 2023-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
173 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-25
2023-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to explore the mentors' opinion on what psychological safety competencies are being acquired by future generations of healthcare professionals (students and residents, hereafter "trainees") through current training programs and what actions should be taken to promote such competencies in clinical settings.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One member of the research team for each participating country will act as national study coordinator in that country.
The study procedure will be structured in the following steps:
1. Research team constitution.
2. Request for study evaluation and approval by an Ethics Committee in each of the participating countries. This step is required only in the case of countries where ethical evaluation is mandatory to conduct this type of study. A common draft of the protocol will be available to support each national coordinator.
3. Collect preliminary information for the subsequent questionnaire re-define for the Delphi study. For this purpose, the available literature on the topic of the study and the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030 (more specifically, objective 5) has been reviewed beforehand. Once the first version of the questionnaire has been drafted from the information collected, interviews will be conducted with 3 mentors from each participating country to assess the legibility, face, and content validity of the draft questionnaire (readability, comprehension, clarity, coherence, relevance, and appropriateness). A template will be available to conduct it.
4. Revision and improvement of the initial version of the questionnaire based on the information gathered through the interviews to ensure the face and content validity of the instrument.
5. Approval of the questionnaire by the research team based on the information collected in steps 3 and 4. The questionnaire will be translated from English into the local languages of the participating countries by two native experts independently. Inconsistencies will be resolved with the participation of a third researcher.
6. Recruitment of participants. The national coordinator will be responsible for contacting the teaching units of healthcare institutions in their country to establish, through them, contact with trainees' mentors. A minimum of 20 participants from each country is expected. They will be working in family medicine, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and medicine departments.
7. Invitation to the study. The questionnaire will be designed on a web platform, property of the research team, hosted on a secure server, and specifically designed for conducting Delphi studies. The responses given to the questionnaire will be treated as fully confidential. However, given the nature of the study (Delphi with several rounds), each participant will access the web platform through personalized credentials to allow continuity in data collection and analysis. Personal information (username and password) will be deleted, and the responses of the same person to the different rounds will be linked by a unique double-blind code. The questionnaire will be disseminated by e-mail. Three reminders are foreseen to ensure an adequate response rate.
8. First round and successive rounds up to expert consensus. A minimum of two rounds will be carried out, and the maximum will be determined by reaching a consensus among the participants.
9. Data analysis and interpretation of the results. Preparation of an article for publication in a scientific journal.
10. Dissemination of the results. The results will be translated into practice to improve the training programs of next generations of health professionals through schools and faculties, ministries of health, and other agencies and scientific societies involved in curricula design. The results will also be disseminated through the usual scientific media (journals, conferences, etc.) and social networks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Croatia
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Croatian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Estonia
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Estonian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Finland
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Finnish healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Germany
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to German healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Israel
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Israeli healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Lithuania
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Lithuanian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Malta
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Maltese healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Portugal
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Portuguese healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Slovakia
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Slovakian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Spain
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Spanish healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Serbia
Twenty to twenty-five professionals assigned to Serbian healthcare institutions (inpatient and outpatient settings, and community, and social care centers) who are responsible for mentoring and supervising residents and students during their clinical internships in the fields of family medicine, obstetrics, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and department of medicine.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Delphi study
A Delphi study will be conducted with several rounds up to expert consensus.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Working in inpatient or outpatient settings or community or social care centers mentoring residents in the fields of family medicine, midwifery, pharmacy, surgery, and medicine department.
Exclusion Criteria
30 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Miguel Hernández University of Elche
UNKNOWN
European Cooperation in Science and Technology, COST
UNKNOWN
RheinMain University of Applied Science
UNKNOWN
University of Tartu
OTHER
Tartu Health Care College
UNKNOWN
LAB University of Applied Sciences
UNKNOWN
University of Haifa
OTHER
Vilnius university hospital Sanatros klinikos
UNKNOWN
University of Malta
OTHER
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
OTHER
Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb
OTHER
Pavol Jozef Safarik University
OTHER
University of Belgrade
OTHER
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
José Joaquín Mira Solves
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grupo ATENEA
Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Donovan R, McAuliffe E. A systematic review exploring the content and outcomes of interventions to improve psychological safety, speaking up and voice behaviour. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4931-2.
Richard A, Pfeiffer Y, Schwappach DDL. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Speaking Up About Patient Safety Questionnaire. J Patient Saf. 2021 Oct 1;17(7):e599-e606. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000415.
Schwappach D, Sendlhofer G, Hasler L, Gombotz V, Leitgeb K, Hoffmann M, Jantscher L, Brunner G. Speaking up behaviors and safety climate in an Austrian university hospital. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 1;30(9):701-707. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy089.
Schwappach D, Sendlhofer G, Kamolz LP, Kole W, Brunner G. Speaking up culture of medical students within an academic teaching hospital: Need of faculty working in patient safety. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222461. eCollection 2019.
Derickson R, Fishman J, Osatuke K, Teclaw R, Ramsel D. Psychological safety and error reporting within Veterans Health Administration hospitals. J Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;11(1):60-6. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000082.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CA19113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id