Effect of Different Administrations of Propofol on Emergence Agitation in Preschool Children Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05420402
Last Updated: 2023-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Propofol and Fentanyl for Prevention of Emergence Agitation in Children After Sevoflurane Anesthesia
NCT01506622
Emergence Agitation of Sevoflurane in Pediatric
NCT06830564
Propofol Versus Sevoflurane for Induction of GA in Infants
NCT05105022
Propofol in Emergence Agitation
NCT00535613
Transition to Propofol After Sevoflurane Anaesthesia to Prevent Emergence Agitation
NCT03179293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This trial is a randomized single-blind clinical trial. The padiatric patients were randomly divided into 4 groups.The block randomization is generated by statistical professionals using SAS9.2 software. The block size is fixed at 8 and randomly changed. Each random number and the corresponding assignment result are placed in a sealed in a transparent envelope. The investigator is responsible for including subjects according to the requirements of the program. When the subjects meet the inclusion criteria but not the exclusion criteria, the field staff will open the envelopes in order to group them.The clinical anesthesia and data statistical analysis were completed by different anesthesiologists and participants.
The four groups of children were fasted for 6 hours and 2 hours before operation, and no preoperative medication was given. After the children were awake and entered the room, the heart rate (HR), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR) and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PetCO2) were continuously monitored. Both groups were given routine standard anesthesia induction: intravenous injection of midazolam at 0.05-0.1 mg/kg of predicted body weight (PBW), propofol at 2-4 mg/kg of PBW, and remifentanil at 1-2 ug/kg of PBW, rocuronium at 0.5-1mg/kg of PBW.After adequate pre-oxygenation,laryngeal mask was placed.Anesthesia was maintained by inhalation of 2%-3% sevoflurane and continuous pumping of remifentanil at 0.2-0.4ug/kg/min remifentanil, with an oxygen flow of 2L/min. The tidal volume method was used in all mechanical ventilation. The tidal volume was between 6 and 8 mL/kg, the respiratory rate was between 18 and 24 breaths/min, and the PetCO2 was maintained between 30 and 35 mmHg. Three minutes before the end of surgery, the oxygen flow was adjusted to 6 L/min, sevoflurane was stopped, and the infusion of remifentanil was stopped. At the end of the operation, the children in all groups received local infiltration anesthesia with 0.3% ropivacaine around the incision by the surgeon.
The children in group A were given 1 mg/kg propofol intravenous bolus 3 minutes before the end of the operation.Children in group B were given continuous pumping of 1 mg/kg propofol 3 minutes before the end of the operation, and the infusion time was 3 minutes. Children in group C 1 mg/kg propofol was given intravenously at the end of the operation. Children in group D were not given propofol and served as a blank control group.
All data were collected, aggregated and maintained by a single investigator.The primary outcome measure was the anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAED). The observation was performed during the recovery period of the child, and the child opened his eyes voluntarily to the stage of complete recovery of consciousness. Mainly from the three aspects of eye contact, behavior and consciousness, the total score is 20 points. 15 points for severe agitation.In addition, the indicators we collected also include age, gender, weight, ASA classification, operation method, operation time, discharge time and occurrence of adverse reactions and so on.
The full analysis set was used for analysis. According to the basic principle of Intention-to-Treat (ITT), the analysis of the main indicators includes all randomized subjects, regardless of whether they completed the trial or not, that is, subjects who were lost to follow-up should also be included in the statistical analysis. Statistical software SPSS 26.0 was used for data processing and statistical analysis. Shapiro-Wilk test was first performed on the data, and continuous variable data (such as blood pressure, heart rate, driving pressure, oxygenation index, etc.) were determined to use Analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H test according to their normal distribution. Categorical variables (such as age,incidence of EA, etc.) were tested by χ² test, Fisher's exact test, and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), percentage (%) or median (interquartile range, IQR), P \<0.05 is statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bolus group A
42 participants will receive 1 mg/kg intravenous bolus of propofol 3 min before the end of surgery.
Propofol bolus
A bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at 3 minutes before the end of the surgery.
Continuous infusion group
42 participants will receive 1 mg/kg continuous intravenous pumping of propofol 3 minutes before the end of the operation, and the pumping time was 3 minutes.
Propofol continuous infusion
1 mg/kg propofol was started by continuous infusion 3 minutes before the end of surgery, and the infusion time was 3 minutes.
Bolus group B
42 participants will receive 1 mg/kg intravenous bolus of propofol at the end of surgery.
Propofol bolus
A bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at the end of the surgery.
Blank Comparator group
42 participants will not receive propofol
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Propofol bolus
A bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at 3 minutes before the end of the surgery.
Propofol continuous infusion
1 mg/kg propofol was started by continuous infusion 3 minutes before the end of surgery, and the infusion time was 3 minutes.
Propofol bolus
A bolus dose of propofol 1 mg/kg was administered intravenously at the end of the surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA classification 1
* Written informed consent
* Children undergoing ambulatory surgery of inguinal hernia
* The operation will take no more than 20 minutes
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological disorders
* Congenital heart insufficiency
* Recent respiratory illness
2 Years
5 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jiaxiang Chen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jiaxiang Chen
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shenzhen Children's Hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fabricant PD, Seeley MA, Rozell JC, Fieldston E, Flynn JM, Wells LM, Ganley TJ. Cost Savings From Utilization of an Ambulatory Surgery Center for Orthopaedic Day Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Dec;24(12):865-871. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00751.
Shinnick JK, Short HL, Heiss KF, Santore MT, Blakely ML, Raval MV. Enhancing recovery in pediatric surgery: a review of the literature. J Surg Res. 2016 May 1;202(1):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.051. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Moore AD, Anghelescu DL. Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
Kanaya A. Emergence agitation in children: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Anesth. 2016 Apr;30(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2098-5. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
Jacob Z, Li H, Makaryus R, Zhang S, Reinsel R, Lee H, Feng T, Rothman DL, Benveniste H. Metabolomic profiling of children's brains undergoing general anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol. Anesthesiology. 2012 Nov;117(5):1062-71. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826be417.
Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D'Mello A. Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS Drugs. 2015 Jul;29(7):543-63. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0259-6.
Wu X, Cao J, Shan C, Peng B, Zhang R, Cao J, Zhang F. Efficacy and safety of propofol in preventing emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia for children. Exp Ther Med. 2019 Apr;17(4):3136-3140. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7289. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
van Hoff SL, O'Neill ES, Cohen LC, Collins BA. Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jul;25(7):668-76. doi: 10.1111/pan.12669. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
Malarbi S, Stargatt R, Howard K, Davidson A. Characterizing the behavior of children emerging with delirium from general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Sep;21(9):942-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03646.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
Bajwa SA, Costi D, Cyna AM. A comparison of emergence delirium scales following general anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Aug;20(8):704-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03328.x.
Chen J, Shi X, Hu W, Lin R, Meng L, Liang C, Ma X, Xu L. Comparing different administration methods of subanaesthetic propofol to mitigate emergence agitation in preschool children undergoing day surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 15;9(1):e002376. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002376.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SZanes0712
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.