Assessment of Digital Consultations on Clinical Impact and Efficiency

NCT ID: NCT05413447

Last Updated: 2024-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healthcare workers have a high workload as compared to other sectors and this burden is projected to increase due to an aging society. It is and will in the future be challenging to deliver optimal HF care because of personnel shortages, the high costs of healthcare, intensive GDMT uptitration schedules, and an epidemic rise in HF patients.This study aims to evaluate the impact of digital consultations (DC) on efficiency and clinical impact in heart failure (HF) patients.

A randomized controlled trial on multifaceted digital consults including 1) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use, home measured vital signs, etc), 2) patient education via an eLearning, and 3) digital guideline recommendations to treating physicians. Included patients will be randomly (1:1) assigned to the intervention group or standard care.

The ADMINISTER trial is expected to offer the first robust randomized controlled multicenter data of GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, patient satisfaction and quality of life of digital consults in GDMT optimization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Many heart failure (HF) patients do not receive optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) despite clear benefit on morbidity and mortality outcomes. Digital consultations (DC) have the potential to improve efficiency on GDMT optimization to serve the growing HF population. Hence, the investigator initiated ADMINISTER trial was designed as a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of DC in patients on HF treatment.

Methods: Patients (n = 150) diagnosed with HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) will be randomized to DC or standard care (1:1). The intervention group receive multifaceted digital consults including 1) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use, home measured vital signs, etc), 2) patient education via an eLearning, and 3) digital guideline recommendations to treating physicians. The consultations are performed remotely unless there is an indication to perform the consult physically. The primary outcome is the GDMT prescription rate score, secondary outcomes include time till full GDMT optimization, patient and clinician satisfaction, time spent on healthcare, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy questionnaire. Results will be reported in accordance to the CONSORT statement.

Conclusion: The ADMINISTER trial will offer the first randomized controlled data on GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, quality of life, and patient and clinician satisfaction of the multifaceted patient and clinician targeted DC for GDMT optimization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Masking the clinicians of the control group assignment is done to optimally capture local practice. Masking of the intervention group is not feasable as patients and healthcare workers will know whether they are receiving normal care or digital care. Outcome measures are determined beforehand.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients receiving digital consultations

The intervention group receive multifaceted digital consults including 1) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use, home measured vital signs, etc), 2) patient education via an eLearning, and 3) digital guideline recommendations to treating physicians. The consultations are performed remotely unless there is an indication to perform the consult physically.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Digital consult

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Consultations will be prepared digitally using the Mychart patient portal, an elearning and questionnaires. The consultation takes place via Teams.

Standard care

If the patient is drawn into the control group the patient will receive standard care. Clinicians are free to use all standard modes of communication, and are not specifically encouraged to use remote types of communication. The clinicians are not informed about the assignment of a patient to the control group to optimally capture remote practice.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital consult

Consultations will be prepared digitally using the Mychart patient portal, an elearning and questionnaires. The consultation takes place via Teams.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HFrEF

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not in possession of any attributes to perform the consults digitally
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Schuuring

Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Cardiology Centers of the Netherlands

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Red Cross Hospital

Beverwijk, , Netherlands

Site Status

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Man JP, Koole MAC, Meregalli PG, Handoko ML, Stienen S, de Lange FJ, Winter MM, Schijven MP, Kok WEM, Kuipers DI, van der Harst P, Asselbergs FW, Zwinderman AH, Dijkgraaf MGW, Chamuleau SAJ, Schuuring MJ. Digital consults in heart failure care: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2907-2913. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03238-6. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39217271 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

123456567

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

New Model of Care in Heart Failure
NCT03476590 COMPLETED NA