Development of a Proactive Health Care Pathway When Initiating Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion in Patients With Parkinson Disease : Impact on Their Autonomy (AUTAP)
NCT ID: NCT05405998
Last Updated: 2023-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-01
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that implementing the program will lead patients to autonomy. This will have beneficial effects on clinical and heath-related outcomes and may be cost-effective.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Infusion of Apomorphine: Long-term Safety Study
NCT02339064
Quality of Life of the Patient and the Burden of the Caregiver in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
NCT03638505
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
NCT03693872
Safety and Efficacy of Autologous iNSC-DAP in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
NCT05901818
Apomorphine Pump in Early Stage of Parkinson's Disease (EARLY-PUMP)
NCT02864004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This care pathway corresponds to a care program combining therapeutic education of the patient, modification of the hospital course and city-hospital coordination. The content of this program is detailed below in chapter III.3. Experimental group: proactive care pathway.
The interest of the protocol will be evaluated at several levels: from the patients' point of view, from the caregivers' point of view, from the medico-economic point of view. Among all the indicators, the achievement of autonomy is retained as the main criterion (see chapter on main evaluation criterion).
Secondary objectives are to measure the value of the proactive care pathway on:
* Patient-related parameters Psychobehavioral factors (quality of life, self-esteem, mood...) ; Treatment persistence; Patient satisfaction; Clinical symptomatology (overall clinical impression, motor and non-motor symptoms, impulse control disorders).
* Caregiver burden.
* Use of the care system in both groups and medico-economic impact of the intervention (cost-consequence analysis and cost-utility analysis) from a societal perspective;
For this study, patients will be accompanied by their caregivers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group : proactive course
The strategy is based on the implementation of an "optimized" proactive care pathway, combining elements that promote city-hospital coordination in setting up the pump and elements that promote patient education.
Proactive care pathway
Patient participation in a specific therapeutic education program, as soon as the therapeutic decision is made.
The reinforced cooperation of the expert centers with the homecare providers on 2 different times:
1. before the installation of the pump, i.e. before the episode of hospitalization dedicated to the starting of the treatment;
2. after the installation of the pump following the above mentioned hospitalization.
Control group : optimized medical treatment
At the end of the inclusion visit (see previous chapter), the patient will be invited to come to the hospital two weeks later for pump placement.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proactive care pathway
Patient participation in a specific therapeutic education program, as soon as the therapeutic decision is made.
The reinforced cooperation of the expert centers with the homecare providers on 2 different times:
1. before the installation of the pump, i.e. before the episode of hospitalization dedicated to the starting of the treatment;
2. after the installation of the pump following the above mentioned hospitalization.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Affiliated to the social security;
* Parkinson's disease according to the diagnostic criteria of the UK Parkinson's disease society brain bank clinical diagnostic criteria;
* Presence of disabling motor fluctuations and/or dyskinesia despite optimized oral treatment (MDS-UPDRS IV item \>2)
* Patient eligible for and accepting apomorphine pump therapy
* Autonomous patient (Hoehn and Yahr stage \< 4);
* No significant cognitive impairment (MoCA \>= 25)
* Patient can be autonomous on the daily management of the pump according to the investigator's opinion.
* Patient having signed an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Major depressive episode, uncontrolled at the time of assessment (BDI\>25) or bipolar disorder;
* Active visual hallucinations or history of severe hallucination episodes;
* Previous apomorphine pump use;
* History of respiratory distress;
* History of severe impulse control disorders;
* Patient and/or caregiver who cannot be empowered in the opinion of the investigator.
* Protected persons, curators, persons under court protection, persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons under forced psychiatric care and persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than those of the research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
François CREMIEUX
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AP-HM
Marseille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Guillaume HACHE
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-A01424-37
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.