Trial Outcomes & Findings for Patient Centered Mobile Health Technology Enabled Atrial Fibrillation Management (NCT NCT05400837)
NCT ID: NCT05400837
Last Updated: 2025-07-03
Results Overview
Feasibility assessed by retention at 12 weeks (number of individuals who continue study participation (defined by App interaction, Coaching call participation or follow up survey completion)
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
12 weeks
2025-07-03
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from outpatient electrophysiology clinics at Johns Hopkins Hospital. A study coordinator reviewed EMRs and let clinicians know which patients were eligible. The clinician introduced the patient to the study, and if they were interested, the study coordinator talked to the patient after their appointment. Interested patients signed informed consent, were randomized, and onboarded to the study the same day.
Participants were assigned their group immediately after signing consent.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=30 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=30 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
Total
n=60 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65 years
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
69 years
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
67.5 years
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
13 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
23 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
17 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
37 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
3 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
2 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
26 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
28 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
54 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
1 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
0 Participants
n=60 Participants • Data was excluded for one participant who asked to have their data deleted from the study.
|
|
Quality of life as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life
|
78.7 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire.
|
73.1 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.1 • n=29 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire.
|
75.6 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.0 • n=52 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire.
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF burden subscore
|
12.8 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
13.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=29 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
13.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=52 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF duration subscore
|
4.1 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
4.3 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
4.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF severity subscore
|
5.3 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
5.4 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
5.4 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF frequency subscore
|
3.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
3.4 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
3.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF symptoms subscore
|
6.3 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
7.9 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
7.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Skills in applying electronic health information to health problems
|
38.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
40.2 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
39.3 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire 8
|
1.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=21 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
1.6 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=51 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 score
|
0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
1.1 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Stress level as assessed by the Perceived Stress Score
|
10.1 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=21 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
10.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
10.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=51 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Alcohol use as assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Physical Activity as assessed by the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity
RAPA Part 1 score
|
5.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
5.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
5.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
|
Physical Activity as assessed by the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity
RAPA Part 2 score
|
1.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=23 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
2.0 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=30 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
1.6 Survey score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=53 Participants • Some participants chose not to complete this questionnaire
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksFeasibility assessed by retention at 12 weeks (number of individuals who continue study participation (defined by App interaction, Coaching call participation or follow up survey completion)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=30 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=31 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Continue Study Participation at 12 Weeks
|
26 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey.
Measured by Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT), which consists of 20 items. Score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores signifying better quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life
|
87.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
76.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS) - validated 19 item questionnaire. Includes 5 subscores. AF burden is the sum of AF duration, AF severity, and AF frequency, and ranges from 3 to 30, with 30 being highest burden. AF duration, severity, and frequency each range from 1 to 10. The final subscore is AF symptoms, which ranges from 0-35 with 35 indicating worst possible symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF burden score (sum of duration, severity, and frequency subscores)
|
11.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF duration score
|
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF severity score
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF frequency score
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Severity as Assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale
AF symptoms score
|
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Measured by 8-item questionnaire eHealth Literacy Scale. Scores range from 10-50 with a higher score indicating higher electronic health literacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skills in Applying Electronic Health Information to Health Problems
|
40.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
40.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ - 8) - 8-item measure with (≤4: no depressive symptom, 5-9: mild, ≥10: moderate to severe depressive symptoms). Score range 0-27 with higher score indicating more depressive symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=21 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire 8
|
1.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
3.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD 7) - score ranges from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more anxiety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety as Assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Score
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Measured by Perceived Stress Score (PSS-10), 10 item questionnaire where score ranges from 0-40 with higher scores indicating higher level of stress.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stress Level as Assessed by the Perceived Stress Score
|
10.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Physical Activity will be assessed by The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA). Part 1 scores range from 1-5 with increasing scores indicating higher levels of activity, 5 being optimal. Part 2 is scored from 0-3 and measures the amount of flexibility and calisthenics exercise a person completes, with 3 being optimal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Activity as Assessed by the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity
RAPA Part 1 score
|
5.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
5.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Physical Activity as Assessed by the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity
RAPA Part 2 score
|
1.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
2.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
As assessed by The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), 10-item questionnaire. The score range is from 0 to 40 with 0 referring to abstainer with no history of alcohol abuse and higher scores indicate gradually higher and hazardous alcohol dependence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alcohol Use as Assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants chose not to complete this survey
Measured by Rate Your Plate (RYP) scale. A 27 item scale administered at 12 weeks with the following scoring system: Score ranges from 27-81. Score of 27-45: There are many ways you can make your eating habits healthier. 46-63: There are some ways you can make your eating habits healthier. 64-81: Higher score indicates participant is making many healthy choices.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=23 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Diet as Assessed by the Rate Your Plate (RYP) Scale
|
65.1 Survey score
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
64.0 Survey score
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Some participants did not complete the 12-week follow-up visit where blood pressure was assessed.
Measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=24 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=28 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure
|
123.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
123.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.2
|
|
Blood Pressure
Diastolic blood pressure
|
75.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.7
|
73.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Not all participants completed the 12-week follow-up visit where weight was measured.
Measured in kilograms over meter squared (Kg/m\^2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=24 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
n=29 Participants
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
29.6 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
29.9 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Participants in usual care did not receive intervention and so did not rate their satisfaction. Not all participants in the intervention chose to complete the survey.
Measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS), modified for the intervention. The SUS score ranges from 0-100, where 0 is "worst imaginable" and 100 is "best imaginable." The average score is 68.0, a good score is between 71.4-85.4. 85.5 and above is considered excellent. Higher score more satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=20 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction With Intervention
|
78.25 score on a scale
Interval 70.5 to 86.75
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Studies were completed one time between enrollment and end of treatment at 12 weeksPopulation: The control group did not complete a sleep study. Not all members of the intervention group chose to complete the sleep study.
Patients completed an at-home sleep study and received a diagnosis of no sleep apnea, mild sleep apnea, moderate sleep apnea, or severe sleep apnea, based on their AHI (apnea-hypopnea index). AHI is measured in breathing disturbance events per hour. An AHI \<5 indicates no sleep apnea, from 5-15 is mild, 16-30 is moderate, and \>30 is severe sleep apnea.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=26 Participants
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
|
Usual Care
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
At-home Sleep Study Results
Diagnosed with mild sleep apnea
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
At-home Sleep Study Results
Diagnosed with moderate to severe sleep apnea
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
At-home Sleep Study Results
Not diagnosed with sleep apnea
|
14 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
Usual Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=30 participants at risk
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program: Intervention aims to implement guideline-recommended Afib care
|
Usual Care
n=31 participants at risk
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
0.00%
0/31 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program
n=30 participants at risk
Multicomponent virtual atrial fibrillation management program
Corrie Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Management Program: Intervention aims to implement guideline-recommended Afib care
|
Usual Care
n=31 participants at risk
Receives usual care. Usual care is defined as care according to the patients care team's standard practice
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Hospitalization
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
|
General disorders
Emergency department visit
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 12 weeks
The investigators asked participants to report any adverse events up to the end of follow-up (12 weeks). Adverse events were adjudicated by the principal investigator.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place