Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Assessment of TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light (NCT NCT05398237)
NCT ID: NCT05398237
Last Updated: 2024-09-24
Results Overview
The number of pre-specified Reverse Phase Protein Microarray Analysis (RPPA) analytes in the TLR4 signaling pathway (AKT S473, AKT T308, IkBa S32/36, IRAK2, IRF-3, IRF-3 S386, MyD88, TAK1 S412, TBK1/NAK, TLR4, TRAF3, TRAF6, TRIF, ERK 1/2 T202/Y204, c-Jun, c-Jun S63, c-Jun S73, NFkB p65 S536, and p38 MAPK T180/Y182) that had a significant change from pre-solar simulated light (pre-SSL) exposure (baseline) to 1hr and 24hr post-SSL in epidermis of sun damaged skin. This outcome will be used to test whether there was a change at the pathway level using the pathway analysis method based on a self-contained, subject-level permutation test: for each analyte a paired t-test is applied to compare the log2 expression level between baseline and the post-SSL time point, and the total number of analytes significantly different at the 0.05 level with change in the expected direction serves as the test statistic, with its null distribution to be estimated by subject-level permutation.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
Changes from baseline (pre-SSL exposure) to post-SSL exposure (at 1hr and 24hr post-exposure).
2024-09-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Assessment of TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
n=30 Participants
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sun Damaged Skin
Mild
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sun Damaged Skin
Moderate
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sun Damaged Skin
Severe
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Changes from baseline (pre-SSL exposure) to post-SSL exposure (at 1hr and 24hr post-exposure).The number of pre-specified Reverse Phase Protein Microarray Analysis (RPPA) analytes in the TLR4 signaling pathway (AKT S473, AKT T308, IkBa S32/36, IRAK2, IRF-3, IRF-3 S386, MyD88, TAK1 S412, TBK1/NAK, TLR4, TRAF3, TRAF6, TRIF, ERK 1/2 T202/Y204, c-Jun, c-Jun S63, c-Jun S73, NFkB p65 S536, and p38 MAPK T180/Y182) that had a significant change from pre-solar simulated light (pre-SSL) exposure (baseline) to 1hr and 24hr post-SSL in epidermis of sun damaged skin. This outcome will be used to test whether there was a change at the pathway level using the pathway analysis method based on a self-contained, subject-level permutation test: for each analyte a paired t-test is applied to compare the log2 expression level between baseline and the post-SSL time point, and the total number of analytes significantly different at the 0.05 level with change in the expected direction serves as the test statistic, with its null distribution to be estimated by subject-level permutation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
n=28 Participants
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of TLR4 Signaling Pathway Analytes With a Significant Change in Expression From Baseline (Pre-solar Stimulated Light Exposure to 1 and 24 Hours Post Exposure)
Number of analytes with significant change from baseline to 1 hour post-SSL
|
5 Number of analytes
|
|
Number of TLR4 Signaling Pathway Analytes With a Significant Change in Expression From Baseline (Pre-solar Stimulated Light Exposure to 1 and 24 Hours Post Exposure)
Number of analytes with significant change from baseline to 24 hours post-SSL
|
11 Number of analytes
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Changes from baseline (pre-SSL exposure) to post-SSL exposure (at 1hr and 24hr post-exposure).Population: There are multiple pre-specified analytes in the TOPK/PRPK pathway. For each pre-specified analyte in a pathway, a paired t-test is applied to compare the log2 expression level between baseline and post-SSL time point, and the total number of analytes significantly different at the 0.05 level (with change in the expected direction) serves as the test statistic, with its null distribution estimated by randomly permuting the within-subject pre-/post-SSL labels 10,000 times.
The number of pre-specified Reverse Phase Protein Microarray Analysis (RPPA) analytes in the TOPK/PRPK signaling pathway (p90RSK S380, PBK/TOPK, PRPK, ERK 1/2 T202/Y204, c-Jun, c-Jun S63, c-Jun S73, NFkB p65 S536, and p38 MAPK T180/Y182) that had a significant change from pre-solar simulated light (pre-SSL) exposure (baseline) to 1hr and 24hr post-SSL in epidermis of sun damaged skin. This outcome will be used to test whether there was a change at the pathway level using the pathway analysis method based on a self-contained, subject-level permutation test: for each analyte a paired t-test is applied to compare the log2 expression level between baseline and the post-SSL time point, and the total number of analytes significantly different at the 0.05 level with change in the expected direction serves as the test statistic, with its null distribution to be estimated by subject-level permutation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
n=28 Participants
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of TOPK/PRPK Signaling Pathway Analytes With a Significant Change in Expression From Baseline (Pre-solar Stimulated Light Exposure to 1 and 24 Hours Post Exposure)
Number of analytes with significant change from baseline to 1 hour post-SSL
|
4 Number of analytes
|
|
Number of TOPK/PRPK Signaling Pathway Analytes With a Significant Change in Expression From Baseline (Pre-solar Stimulated Light Exposure to 1 and 24 Hours Post Exposure)
Number of analytes with significant change from baseline to 24 hours post-SSL
|
5 Number of analytes
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-SSL exposure) and post-SSL exposure (at 5hr and 24hr post-exposure).The exploratory analyses will associate the sun damage score/severity level with analyte activation in the sun damage samples. Based on these analyses, the most appropriate post-solar simulated light time point (per pathway) will be selected based on the combination with the largest effect sizes. Furthermore, an exploratory systems biology analysis will be conducted based on these analyses; one post-SSL time point (per pathway) will be selected for future studies based on the combination with the largest effect sizes.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TLR4 and TOPK/PRPK Signaling in Sun Damaged Human Skin Acutely Exposed to Solar Simulated Light
n=30 participants at risk
We have one arm, which consists of participants with a broad range of sun damage on the forearm. Based on the standardized clinical photodamage scale (Hu C, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Archives of Dermatology, 2011; 147(1):31-36), we will include mild (N=12), moderate (N=12), and severely (N=12) sun damaged skin.
Solar Simulated Light (SSL): Acute SSL will be delivered to sun damaged skin at a rate of two-times the minimal erythema dose of each individual subject. Minimal erythema dose is defined as the smallest dose of energy necessary to produce confluent erythema with four distinct borders at 22-26 hours post-exposure.
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Swelling
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain at biopsy site
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data was collected through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Erythema
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
|
Additional Information
Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski, MD
University of Arizona Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place