Acceptability and Performance of a Mobile Optical Biopsy Technology for Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening
NCT ID: NCT05396781
Last Updated: 2022-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-13
2022-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Feasibility Study of Confocal Microendoscopy in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Neoplasia -Project 1
NCT01384695
Gastric In Vivo Study
NCT02207959
Optical Imaging of Gastrointestinal Biopsy Samples and Their Correlation With Histology
NCT04565704
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for the Diagnosis of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia, Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Carcinoma
NCT01642797
Early Detection of Tumors of the Digestive Tract by Confocal Endomicroscopy
NCT02284802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective 1: The investigators' first objective is to evaluate the marHRME technology in terms of performance, efficiency, and impact. In a single-arm, feasibility study (n=50) of high-risk subjects undergoing Lugol's chromoendoscopy (LCE) followed by marHRME for esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) screening, the investigators will evaluate the diagnostic performance and efficiency of this automated optical biopsy device.
The investigators' main hypothesis is that the marHRME will:
1. increase the accuracy of Lugol's endoscopy (LCE), other exploratory hypotheses are
2. increase the accuracy of marHRME among novices and be non-inferior to experts,
3. increase user confidence among experts and novices and, subsequently,
4. increase the efficiency and impact of LCE by reducing biopsies and second procedures.
For performance for marHRME vs. Standard of Care, the investigators will compare the accuracy of the marHRME + LCE vs. LCE alone to the gold-standard histopathology (expert GI pathologist). For performance of the Machine vs. Man, the investigators will compare accuracy of the marHRME software read to novice and expert clinicians' subjective read to gold-standard histopathology. For clinician confidence and clinical impact, the investigators will determine the clinician's confidence level in the software diagnosis and the potential clinical impact of this diagnosis among novice and expert endoscopists using marHRME.
Objective 2: The investigators' secondary objective is to evaluate the acceptability of the technology among patients and providers. All patients participating in the study will be invited to participate in a brief (20 min) interviewer-administered survey prior to undergoing endoscopy to assess attitudes and barriers to marHRME, and a follow-up interview (7 days post-procedure) to determine experiences and acceptability. Informed consent and the initial interview will be conducted in a private clinic room by trained study staff from the Brazilian team using a brief Portuguese-language survey. The follow-up interview will occur by phone, after a routine follow-up call by clinical staff.
The endoscopists and trainees participating in the feasibility study will be invited to participate in a series of questionnaires and in- depth interviews administered at different time points of the study to assess provider acceptance. Informed consent will be obtained prior to the first interview. Clinicians will answer a brief questionnaire to assess acceptance of marHRME prior to undergoing raining, after training, and after conducting 25 procedures. After 25 procedures, endoscopists and trainees will participate in a 30- minute semi-structured interview to assess marHRME experience. The interviews will be audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and translated (Portuguese to English) for coding and analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Augmented Reality High Resolution Microendoscope (HRME) imaging
All study subjects will receive White Light Imaging and Lugol's Chromoendoscopy (LCE) which is the current standard of care procedure. The investigators will record any LCE abnormal areas and record the clinician's plan of action. Following LCE, all subjects will receive Mobile, Augmented Reality High Resolution Microendoscope (marHRME) imaging with the study contrast agent (Proflavine) of any LCE-identified abnormal areas as well as LCE normal areas. The investigators will record the subjective clinician read and confidence level in the investigators' diagnosis, and plan of action. Then the investigators will image the same abnormal and normal areas with the marHRME and record the software read, clinician confidence level, and plan of action. Finally, the imaged areas will be biopsied or resected and evaluated by a pathologist. All subjects will receive both standard of care and marHRME imaging.
Proflavine
5-10 ml of proflavine hemisulfate (0.01%) will be sprayed on the esophageal mucosa.
Mobile, Augmented High Resolution Microendoscope
The marHRME will then be inserted through the endoscope and gently placed against the mucosa. Imaging of abnormal tissues will be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proflavine
5-10 ml of proflavine hemisulfate (0.01%) will be sprayed on the esophageal mucosa.
Mobile, Augmented High Resolution Microendoscope
The marHRME will then be inserted through the endoscope and gently placed against the mucosa. Imaging of abnormal tissues will be performed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be \>18 years old and able to give informed consent.
* For the provider surveys and interviews, all providers (clinicians, trainees) who are working on the project will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unable to give informed consent
* Known advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus, or dyplastic/suspected malignant esophageal lesion greater than or equal to 2cm in size not amenable to endoscopic therapy
* Patient unable to undergo routine endoscopy with biopsy
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
* Prothrombin time greater than 50% of control; Partial Thromboplastin Time greater than 50 sec, or International Normalized Ratio greater than 2.0
* inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardio-pulmonary instability or other significant medical issues
* Providers will be excluded if they decline participation or otherwise opt out of the proposed research project.
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
William Marsh Rice University
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Anandasabapathy, Sharmila, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharmila Anandasabapathy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-44015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.