Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) Therapies Trial

NCT ID: NCT05390411

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1463 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-06

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this study is to assess real-world effectiveness and implementation of an evidence-based multi-component strategy to reduce disparities in the allocation rate of advanced heart failure therapies, heart transplants and ventricular assist devices. This study proposes to implement evidence-based strategies that reduce unequal and unethical decision-making towards patients, replace subjective evaluations with objective criteria, and improve group dynamics in a randomized cluster trial. Our rigorously designed trial will inform national guidelines for advanced heart failure therapy allocation, and data are likely to be generalizable to other organ replacement treatments and advanced chronic disease decision-making processes across populations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Standardized protocols can reduce the impact of unfair and unequal treatment but are underused. Since the Institute of Medicine's report, "Unequal Treatment", multiple studies have confirmed that standardization of decision-making processes reduces unequal treatment, but unequal and unethical perceptions in decision-making in the allocation of advanced therapies has not been addressed. Using an evidence-based framework for behavior change \[Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Behavior Change/Behavior Change Wheel (COM-B/BCW)\], we developed a standardized protocol strategy, Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF), that addresses the most significant barriers to equality in advanced therapies: 1) unequal and unethical perceptions that influence decision-making, 2) subjectivity in evaluation of social support and adherence, and 3) poor group dynamics. Thus, SOCIAL HF includes: 1) evidence-based training to reduce disparities tailored for HF, 2) restriction to objective evaluations of social support and adherence, and 3) environmental restructuring and modeling of meeting settings to include anonymous electronic voting and more fair-minded seating arrangement. In complex decision-making that includes individuals and groups, our standardized protocol strategy, SOCIAL HF, has the greatest likelihood of reducing health disparities in advanced HF. Our goal is to assess real-world effectiveness (Aim 1) and implementation (Aim 2) of SOCIAL HF for allocation of advanced HF therapies, heart transplant and ventricular assist device implantation. As a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study, we will use a cluster randomized design to test the effectiveness of SOCIAL HF strategy. We will evaluate implementation of SOCIAL HF across study sites using mixed-methods to learn optimal implementation strategies to reduce disparities in accessing life-saving therapies. We will use normalization process theory to evaluate how SOCIAL HF affects processes and outcomes important to advanced HF centers (e.g. fidelity/variation). We will use RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) to evaluate factors that promote reach and adoption and resources needed for implementation. We have the relationships, infrastructure, and expertise to execute this project; our multidisciplinary team includes experts in HF, evidence-based training in reducing unequal and unethical perceptions in decision-making, clinical trials, mixed-methods, and implementation science.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Decision Making Implementation Science Heart Transplant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Pragmatic randomized controlled cluster trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Sites

No Intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Sites Randomized to SOCIAL HF

SOCIAL HF is composed of evidence-based disparities reduction training, employment of objective measures of social support, and changes to facilitate group dynamics.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SOCIAL HF

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

participate in SOCIAL HF training

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SOCIAL HF

participate in SOCIAL HF training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Active United Network for Organ Sharing heart transplant and ventricular assist device center
2. Centers that routinely evaluate at least 50 minoritized racial/ethnic patients and 50 women for advanced heart failure therapies (heart transplant and ventricular assist device) over 2 years
3. Advanced therapy professionals from participating centers (i.e., coordinators, physicians, pharmacists, nurses, social workers)
4. Participants for the interview portion will be a subset of otherwise eligible advanced therapy professionals who are included on selection meeting attendance sheets at an included center

Exclusion Criteria

1. Centers unable to fully participate in the training and evaluation measures
2. If the center ceases to be an active heart failure/transplant center
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Khadijah Breathett, MD, MS, FACC, FAHA, FHFSA

tenured Associate Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Khadijah Breathett, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R56HL159216

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01HL159216

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

13943

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enhancing Heart Failure Self-Care
NCT00526773 COMPLETED NA