Comparing the Efficacy of Surgery Staging and Image Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05378087

Last Updated: 2023-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1956 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-27

Study Completion Date

2032-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a domestic multicenter, prospective, non-randomized controlled concurrent trial. It will be assessed whether surgery staging on locally advanced cervical cancer is superior to image staging for improving progression-free survival and overall survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All eligible patients will be divided into the following two treatment groups nonrandomly.

Image staging group: standard chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy+brachytherapy).

Surgery staging group: open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (Level of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation will be conducted within 28 days postoperatively.)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a non-randomized controlled concurrent trial. According to the patients' voluntary choice, they are enrolled on the surgery staging group or image staging group. All patients are evaluated by CT(≥32 slices) or MRI(≥1.5T) or PET/CT. The criteria for positive pelvic or para-aortic lymph nodes (one of the following): ① CT or MRI show more than one positive lymph node with a short diameter ≥ 15mm; ② PET/CT shows more than one positive lymph node with SUV ≥ 2.5; ③ If CT or MRI show positive lymph node with a short diameter between 10mm and 15mm, PET / CT should further verify that it is a positive lymph node with SUV ≥ 2.5.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Image staging group

Standard chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy + brachytherapy).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Concurrent chemoradiation

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard concurrent chemoradiation: A point/HCR-CTV D90 ≥80Gy (+20%) by using IMRT or TOMO technics. Patients with image-positive common iliac lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes receive extended-field EBRT. Brachytherapy should begin after 15-20F external radiotherapy. A radiation dose for the image-positive nodes can range from 55Gy to 60Gy. Five cycles of concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2 q1w or Carboplatin AUC=2 q1w, Window period one week) and CCRT should be completed within 56 days. CCRT one week later, if the cervix biopsy shows residual tumour and/or imaging (CT/MRI/PET/CT) indicates that there are still positive lymph nodes in the pelvic and abdominal cavity, three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (TP: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Cisplatin 50mg/m2, q3w or TC: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC=4, q3W; Window period 2 weeks) ± brachytherapy will be performed (A point/HR-CTV D90 ≤ 96Gy).

Surgery staging group

Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy + brachytherapy).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (height of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation should be performed postoperatively within 28 days.) The chemoradiation is consistent with the image staging group, except for extended-field EBRT determined by pathological positive para-aortic lymph nodes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Concurrent chemoradiation

Standard concurrent chemoradiation: A point/HCR-CTV D90 ≥80Gy (+20%) by using IMRT or TOMO technics. Patients with image-positive common iliac lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes receive extended-field EBRT. Brachytherapy should begin after 15-20F external radiotherapy. A radiation dose for the image-positive nodes can range from 55Gy to 60Gy. Five cycles of concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2 q1w or Carboplatin AUC=2 q1w, Window period one week) and CCRT should be completed within 56 days. CCRT one week later, if the cervix biopsy shows residual tumour and/or imaging (CT/MRI/PET/CT) indicates that there are still positive lymph nodes in the pelvic and abdominal cavity, three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (TP: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Cisplatin 50mg/m2, q3w or TC: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC=4, q3W; Window period 2 weeks) ± brachytherapy will be performed (A point/HR-CTV D90 ≤ 96Gy).

Intervention Type RADIATION

Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation

Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (height of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation should be performed postoperatively within 28 days.) The chemoradiation is consistent with the image staging group, except for extended-field EBRT determined by pathological positive para-aortic lymph nodes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patients with good compliance, voluntarily signed the informed consent form and participated in the study.
2. Histopathology: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma
3. Stage (FIGO2018): IB3, IIA2, IIB-IVA;
4. ECOG score: 0 \~ 1;
5. The expected survival \>6 months;
6. The result of a pregnancy test (serum or urine) within seven days must be negative for women of childbearing age, who must take contraception during the trial.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Activity or uncontrol severe infection;
2. Liver cirrhosis or other decompensated liver disease;
3. A history of immune deficiency, including HIV positive or a congenital immunodeficiency disease;
4. Chronic renal insufficiency or renal failure;
5. Other malignancies were diagnosed within five years or needed treatments;
6. Myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia and congestive heart failure with grade ≥2 (New York heart association);
7. The CT/MRI/PET/CT show that the para-aortic lymph nodes are positive;
8. A history of pelvic artery embolization;
9. A history of pelvic radiotherapy;
10. A history of partial hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy;
11. A history of severe allergic reaction to platinum drugs;
12. The drugs for the treatment of concomitant disease seriously impaired liver or kidney function, such as tuberculosis;
13. Patients who cannot understand the research regimen and refuse to sign the informed consent form;
14. Other concomitant diseases or special conditions seriously endanger the patient's health or interfere with the trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chongqing University Cancer Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dongling Zou

Director of Gynecologic Oncology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dongling Zou, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chongqing University Cancer Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chongqing University Cancer Hospital

Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dongling Zou, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

13657690699

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dongling Zou, M.D.

Role: primary

13657690699

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33538338 (View on PubMed)

Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, Kehoe ST, Konishi I, Olawaiye AB, Prat J, Sankaranarayanan R, Brierley J, Mutch D, Querleu D, Cibula D, Quinn M, Botha H, Sigurd L, Rice L, Ryu HS, Ngan H, Maenpaa J, Andrijono A, Purwoto G, Maheshwari A, Bafna UD, Plante M, Natarajan J. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30656645 (View on PubMed)

Martinez A, Angeles MA, Querleu D, Ferron G, Pomel C. How should we stage and tailor treatment strategy in locally advanced cervical cancer? Imaging versus para-aortic surgical staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1434-1443. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001351. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32788263 (View on PubMed)

Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010 Jun;101(6):1471-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20298252 (View on PubMed)

Kang S, Kim SK, Chung DC, Seo SS, Kim JY, Nam BH, Park SY. Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET for evaluation of paraaortic nodal metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma: a metaanalysis. J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar;51(3):360-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066217. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20150275 (View on PubMed)

Gouy S, Seebacher V, Chargari C, Terroir M, Grimaldi S, Ilenko A, Maulard A, Genestie C, Leary A, Pautier P, Morice P, Deandreis D. False negative rate at 18F-FDG PET/CT in para-aortic lymphnode involvement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: impact of PET technology. BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07821-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33549033 (View on PubMed)

Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Martinez A, Rey A, Bentivegna E, Pautier P, Deandreis D, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3026-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3520. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23857967 (View on PubMed)

Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Gilmore J, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E. Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):e212-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70011-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22554549 (View on PubMed)

Gold MA, Tian C, Whitney CW, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1954-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23400.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18338811 (View on PubMed)

Frumovitz M, Querleu D, Gil-Moreno A, Morice P, Jhingran A, Munsell MF, Macapinlac HA, Leblanc E, Martinez A, Ramirez PT. Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23911560 (View on PubMed)

Kohler C, Mustea A, Marnitz S, Schneider A, Chiantera V, Ulrich U, Scharf JP, Martus P, Vieira MA, Tsunoda A. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):503.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25986030 (View on PubMed)

Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, Lee CL, Chou HH, Chang TC, Hsueh S, Huang HJ, Ng KK, Tsai CS. Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Apr;89(1):160-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00064-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12694671 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CQGOG0106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.