Comparing the Efficacy of Surgery Staging and Image Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05378087
Last Updated: 2023-08-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
1956 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-27
2032-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for LACC
NCT06288373
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Combined With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treated Advanced Cervical Cancer
NCT05735145
Randomized Control Trial on Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for the Cervical Cancer
NCT02703961
The Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
NCT04409860
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients
NCT01755897
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Image staging group: standard chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy+brachytherapy).
Surgery staging group: open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (Level of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation will be conducted within 28 days postoperatively.)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Image staging group
Standard chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy + brachytherapy).
Concurrent chemoradiation
Standard concurrent chemoradiation: A point/HCR-CTV D90 ≥80Gy (+20%) by using IMRT or TOMO technics. Patients with image-positive common iliac lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes receive extended-field EBRT. Brachytherapy should begin after 15-20F external radiotherapy. A radiation dose for the image-positive nodes can range from 55Gy to 60Gy. Five cycles of concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2 q1w or Carboplatin AUC=2 q1w, Window period one week) and CCRT should be completed within 56 days. CCRT one week later, if the cervix biopsy shows residual tumour and/or imaging (CT/MRI/PET/CT) indicates that there are still positive lymph nodes in the pelvic and abdominal cavity, three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (TP: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Cisplatin 50mg/m2, q3w or TC: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC=4, q3W; Window period 2 weeks) ± brachytherapy will be performed (A point/HR-CTV D90 ≤ 96Gy).
Surgery staging group
Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by chemoradiation (Pelvic EBRT/Extended-field EBRT + concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy + brachytherapy).
Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation
Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (height of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation should be performed postoperatively within 28 days.) The chemoradiation is consistent with the image staging group, except for extended-field EBRT determined by pathological positive para-aortic lymph nodes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Concurrent chemoradiation
Standard concurrent chemoradiation: A point/HCR-CTV D90 ≥80Gy (+20%) by using IMRT or TOMO technics. Patients with image-positive common iliac lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes receive extended-field EBRT. Brachytherapy should begin after 15-20F external radiotherapy. A radiation dose for the image-positive nodes can range from 55Gy to 60Gy. Five cycles of concurrent platinum-containing chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2 q1w or Carboplatin AUC=2 q1w, Window period one week) and CCRT should be completed within 56 days. CCRT one week later, if the cervix biopsy shows residual tumour and/or imaging (CT/MRI/PET/CT) indicates that there are still positive lymph nodes in the pelvic and abdominal cavity, three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (TP: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Cisplatin 50mg/m2, q3w or TC: Paclitaxel 135mg/m2, Carboplatin AUC=4, q3W; Window period 2 weeks) ± brachytherapy will be performed (A point/HR-CTV D90 ≤ 96Gy).
Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation
Open/minimally invasive para-aortic lymph node dissection followed by concurrent chemoradiation. (height of lymph node dissection: At least the inferior mesenteric artery. Chemoradiation should be performed postoperatively within 28 days.) The chemoradiation is consistent with the image staging group, except for extended-field EBRT determined by pathological positive para-aortic lymph nodes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histopathology: squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma
3. Stage (FIGO2018): IB3, IIA2, IIB-IVA;
4. ECOG score: 0 \~ 1;
5. The expected survival \>6 months;
6. The result of a pregnancy test (serum or urine) within seven days must be negative for women of childbearing age, who must take contraception during the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Liver cirrhosis or other decompensated liver disease;
3. A history of immune deficiency, including HIV positive or a congenital immunodeficiency disease;
4. Chronic renal insufficiency or renal failure;
5. Other malignancies were diagnosed within five years or needed treatments;
6. Myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia and congestive heart failure with grade ≥2 (New York heart association);
7. The CT/MRI/PET/CT show that the para-aortic lymph nodes are positive;
8. A history of pelvic artery embolization;
9. A history of pelvic radiotherapy;
10. A history of partial hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy;
11. A history of severe allergic reaction to platinum drugs;
12. The drugs for the treatment of concomitant disease seriously impaired liver or kidney function, such as tuberculosis;
13. Patients who cannot understand the research regimen and refuse to sign the informed consent form;
14. Other concomitant diseases or special conditions seriously endanger the patient's health or interfere with the trial.
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chongqing University Cancer Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dongling Zou
Director of Gynecologic Oncology Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dongling Zou, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chongqing University Cancer Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chongqing University Cancer Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, Kehoe ST, Konishi I, Olawaiye AB, Prat J, Sankaranarayanan R, Brierley J, Mutch D, Querleu D, Cibula D, Quinn M, Botha H, Sigurd L, Rice L, Ryu HS, Ngan H, Maenpaa J, Andrijono A, Purwoto G, Maheshwari A, Bafna UD, Plante M, Natarajan J. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Apr;145(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12749. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Martinez A, Angeles MA, Querleu D, Ferron G, Pomel C. How should we stage and tailor treatment strategy in locally advanced cervical cancer? Imaging versus para-aortic surgical staging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1434-1443. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001351. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Cancer Sci. 2010 Jun;101(6):1471-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
Kang S, Kim SK, Chung DC, Seo SS, Kim JY, Nam BH, Park SY. Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET for evaluation of paraaortic nodal metastasis in patients with cervical carcinoma: a metaanalysis. J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar;51(3):360-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.066217. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
Gouy S, Seebacher V, Chargari C, Terroir M, Grimaldi S, Ilenko A, Maulard A, Genestie C, Leary A, Pautier P, Morice P, Deandreis D. False negative rate at 18F-FDG PET/CT in para-aortic lymphnode involvement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: impact of PET technology. BMC Cancer. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07821-9.
Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Martinez A, Rey A, Bentivegna E, Pautier P, Deandreis D, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E. Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3026-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3520. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
Gouy S, Morice P, Narducci F, Uzan C, Gilmore J, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Querleu D, Haie-Meder C, Leblanc E. Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):e212-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70011-6.
Gold MA, Tian C, Whitney CW, Rose PG, Lanciano R. Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1954-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23400.
Frumovitz M, Querleu D, Gil-Moreno A, Morice P, Jhingran A, Munsell MF, Macapinlac HA, Leblanc E, Martinez A, Ramirez PT. Lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer study (LiLACS): Phase III clinical trial comparing surgical with radiologic staging in patients with stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Kohler C, Mustea A, Marnitz S, Schneider A, Chiantera V, Ulrich U, Scharf JP, Martus P, Vieira MA, Tsunoda A. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):503.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 May 15.
Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, Lee CL, Chou HH, Chang TC, Hsueh S, Huang HJ, Ng KK, Tsai CS. Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Apr;89(1):160-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00064-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CQGOG0106
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.