Discharge in the AM

NCT ID: NCT05370638

Last Updated: 2022-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-09

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

As hospitals around the country continue to work to manage a high patient census, provider prioritization of discharges is one low cost mechanism to help improve patient throughput and patient length of stay. The investigators conducted a prospective randomized study to understand if this commonly utilized approach to expedite care results in earlier discharges and lower hospital lengths of stay while also understanding the impact on other patient care (such as test and consult order times on other patients that the physician is caring for).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hospitals around the country face bottlenecks and capacity issues. When hospitals are successful at managing high capacity this allows for increased access for patients who need this higher level of care and expertise.

Unfortunately, hospital discharges frequently occur in the afternoon or evening hours and can adversely affect patient flow throughout the hospital which, in turn, can result in delays in care, medication errors, increased mortality, longer lengths of stay, higher costs, lower patient satisfaction, and decreased access to care at these facilities. While some of the delays in discharges result, appropriately, from the caring of other patients and conducting the necessary tasks and assessments for acutely ill patients, previous work also identified that providers may be able to prioritize their work in a different way in order to facilitate this throughput. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial of physician rounding style at three institutions in order to: (1) determine if prioritizing discharging patients first will result in earlier discharges and decreased lengths of stay, (2) determine if prioritizing discharges first will cause other care delays or affect patient experience and, (3) determine factors that contribute to physician ability to prioritizing discharges first. The study is a prospective, multi-center, cluster randomized trial designed to test the effects of rounding on discharging patients first compared to usual practice and will utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid approach. The investigators will recruit hospitalist attending physicians from three hospitals in the US to be randomized to one of two rounding styles: (1) prioritize discharges first and (2) usual practice. The main outcome measure will be discharge order time. Secondary outcomes will be length of stay and lab/diagnostic test order time. Additionally, the investigators will study how team composition (teaching, non-teaching, teams with advanced practice providers), team census (i.e. the number of patients a provider is caring for), and number of admissions affect the ability for providers to prioritize discharges first.

Through qualitative methods the investigators will also gain an understanding from physicians as to why or why not they were able to prioritize discharges first. This study will add to the evidence to either support or negate the practice of prioritizing discharges. There have been no randomized studies to date that have addressed these issues. Additionally, the investigators aim to understand how team composition and census affect discharge times. Institutions across the country will be able to utilize these findings to help refine current rounding models. The investigators believe these findings will be pivotal for clinicians to be more willing to change their practice style. The investigators also believe this study will aid in the understanding of what factors may function as facilitators and barriers of earlier discharges.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hospitalism Flow or Discharge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rounding on discharging patients first

Rounding on discharging patients meant that the attending physician and accompanying team (i.e. if they were working with advanced practice providers or learners) would prioritize seeing any patients that were going to discharge that day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rounding on discharging patients first

Intervention Type OTHER

Rounding on discharging patients meant that the attending physician and accompanying team (i.e. if they were working with advanced practice providers or learners) would prioritize seeing any patients that were going to discharge that day. The attending could break protocol if needed for patient care purposes and this was tracked each day.

usual practice

Usual practice was categorized as: seeing discharging patients first, sickest patients, decompensating patients, new patients (i.e. patients admitted to their team overnight), or based on geography.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rounding on discharging patients first

Rounding on discharging patients meant that the attending physician and accompanying team (i.e. if they were working with advanced practice providers or learners) would prioritize seeing any patients that were going to discharge that day. The attending could break protocol if needed for patient care purposes and this was tracked each day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Physicians:

-Hospital Medicine attending-level physicians who consented to participate and patients

Patients:

* At least 18 years of age
* Admitted to a Medicine service and assigned by standard practice to a general medical hospitalist team including a provider who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

-Patients assigned, by standard practice, to a general medical hospitalist team and on the team of providers who chose not to participate in the study
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Denver Health and Hospital Authority

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marisha Burden, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burden M, Gundareddy VP, Kauffman R, Keach JW, McBeth L, Raffel KE, Rice JD, Washburn C, Kisuule F, Keniston A. Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study. J Hosp Med. 2025 May;20(5):471-478. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13555. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39588662 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-1607

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.