Legacies and Futures: Measuring Roles of Resilience and Vulnerability in Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT05365828

Last Updated: 2024-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

945 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-17

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pregnancy care typically assumes patients are heterosexual married women whose gender matches their assigned sex (i.e., cisgender), stigmatizing patients and creating limitations, blocking affirming care. Consequently, lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, intersex, asexual, and/or transgender (LGBTQIA+) parents face minority stress as discrimination in antenatal care. This mixed-methods study assesses stressors and resilience factors on pregnancy and birth outcomes. LGBTQIA+ pregnant parents (n=200) are case-matched with cisheterosexual peers (n=600). Primary data comes from two panel surveys, one antenatally and one postpartum, combined with medical records. A sub-sample (n=30) will complete a journal between surveys. Findings will inform care guidelines and provider training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients using reproductive health services, like care during pregnancy (called antenatal care), are most often assumed to be heterosexual married women whose gender matched their sex assigned at birth (i.e., cisgender). Due to these assumptions, pregnancy care procedures are based on a sweeping assumption of who becomes pregnant and gives birth. This assumption is based on the pregnant person's gender and/or sexual orientation. As a result of this assumption, parents who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, intersex, asexual, non-binary, and/or transgender (LGBTQIA+) can experience stress in the form of stigma, prejudice, and discrimination (i.e. "minority stress"). In the United Kingdom, there are 525,000 LGBTQIA+ potential gestational patients who may face this type of stress while receiving pregnancy care. That means that there is a preventable higher risk for pregnancy and birth complications caused by increased stress during pregnancy and daily life. These complications include macrosomia, pre-term birth, and low-birth weight. Preventable stress, also called minority stress, links to this increase in health problems outside of pregnancy as well. Since minority stress influences patient/parents' health, it is also called a risk or vulnerability. Resilience, or the ability to overcome stress and discrimination, can sometimes help improve health outcomes. However, little is known about which types of resilience can be helpful for LGBTQIA+ parents given their unique experiences of minority stress.

The planned observational study will investigate the ways in which experiences of minority stress and resilience in pregnancy care are associated with parent health and birth outcomes. A sample of pregnant patients (N=800) from maternity wards in and around London will take part through an online panel survey (completed twice) that will be linked to each patient/participant's electronic health records to create a quantitative dataset. Participant recruitment will focus on LGBTQIA+ pregnant patients (n=200). A matched comparison sample of cisgender, heterosexual pregnant patients (n=600) will also be recruited to take part from the same maternity. From the full sample, patient/parents from University College London Hospital will be invited to complete an at-home journal activity which will provide qualitative data on their experiences of minority stress and resilience. This smaller group (n=30). Results from this study can be used to inform LGBTQIA+ guidelines, training, and help make reproductive healthcare more inclusive.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Related

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

LGBTQIA+ Reproduction Resilience Vulnerability Risk Neonatal Health Parent Health Allostatic Load

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gestational parents

The study is composed of a sample of LGBTQIA+ and cisgender, heterosexual parents who are receiving antenatal care at the participating hospitals.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Legal adult of reproductive age (18-49)
* Identifies as a lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, nonbinary, intersex, and/or transgender (or cisgender and heterosexual for comparison sample)
* Currently pregnant and receiving antenatal care at one of the study sites

Exclusion Criteria

* Any pregnant persons under the age of 18
* Pregnant individuals using sites locations for Urgent care, A\&E, non-antenatal services only
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCL, Bloomsbury and East London (UBEL) Doctoral Training Partnership

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Economic and Social Research Council, United Kingdom

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College London Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Homerton University Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barts & The London NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David M Frost, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University College, London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Brixton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Kingston upon Thames, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Whittington Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's University Hospitals NHS foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Watford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation

Worthing, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS 264198

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EDGE 124858

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id