Transoral Fundoplication Prior to Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus RNY Gastric Bypass on GERD Symptoms in Bariatric Patients
NCT ID: NCT05365087
Last Updated: 2025-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
180 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-01
2032-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long Term Outcomes of Bariatric Patients Treated With Surgery or Endoscopy
NCT03705416
the Related Factors of Bariatric Surgery on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT03497494
Does Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lead to Barrett's Esophagus, 5-year Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Findings: A Retrospective Cohort Study
NCT04587310
Prevalence, Predictors and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT05416645
Mechanism of Weight Loss After Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Sleeve Procedures
NCT04006002
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been touted as the gold standard to treat both obesity and GERD; however, this procedure has a higher morbidity rate. While LSG has relatively low rates of re-operations, the LRYGB carries significant lifetime risk for multiple operative procedures due to adhesive bowel obstruction, internal hernia, non-healing ulcers and intussusception. Furthermore, nutrient malabsorption following LRYGB can result in irreversible neurological complications, and accelerated, ongoing decline in bone mineral density.. Options for surgical correction of GERD are limited following bariatric surgery. However, options for anti-reflux procedures prior to undergoing bariatric surgery are viable, and may include Transoral Fundoplication.
Transoral fundoplication is an anti-reflux procedure which has proven to achieve long-lasting relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and eliminate, or reduce the use of proton pump inhibitors. Daily dependence on PPI's were eliminated in 75-80% of cases for up to six years in a 2014 study conducted by Testoni et al.. Although a TF procedure is not an option post bariatric surgery due to technical issues, it is available prior to LSG. With these surgeries working in tandem, patients may attain the benefits of both, as they are reciprocal in nature: TF provides anti-reflux barriers and LSG enables patients to lose weight, which ultimately decreases GER symptoms.
We propose that performing a TF procedure prior to a sleeve gastrectomy will result in a decrease in GERD symptoms similar to that of a LRYGB. In addition to evaluating symptoms, we will perform endoscopy screening post bariatric surgery at one, three, five and 10 years or more often as indicated , to assess for asymptomatic GERD and its sequelae..
Population to be Reviewed
1\. Patient Identification
1. Patients seen for bariatric surgery consultation who report a history or current symptoms of GERD, or who are taking some form of medication for treatment of GERD, are asked to complete the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire .The GERD-HRQL is a validated, reliable and practical standard instrument which assesses the impact and severity of reflux symptoms on a patient's quality of life. The use of the GERD-HQRL for this purpose reflects a standard of care in the evaluation of any patient presenting with GERD symptoms.
2. The GERD-HRQL consists of 11 questions which focus on disease symptoms such as heartburn, difficulty swallowing, bloating, and pain, as well as the effect of these symptoms on daily life and an individual's satisfaction with their current condition. Symptoms are scored from 0 to 5, 0= no symptoms, 1= symptoms noticeable but not bothersome, 2= symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day, 3= symptoms bothersome every day, 4= symptoms affect daily activities, 5= symptoms are incapacitating, and unable to do activities. The summation of this score represents the severity and frequency of typical GERD symptoms. A score of 13 or higher on the GERD-HRQL warrants further diagnostic workup which may include the following: esophagogastroduodenoscopy, esophageal ambulatory pH study, esophageal manometry, and an upper gastrointestinal series.
3. Each patient is then presented at the GERD conference where treatment options are discussed and determined. The GERD conference is a multi-disciplinary meeting in which the patient's diagnostic results are presented in consideration of their personal history and comorbidities; based on these results, medical history and present status, treatment plans are discussed in order to provide the patient with the best possible outcome.
4. Treatment options are then presented to the patient, who ultimately decides the course of action. In general, patients are allowed to choose the surgical option that meets their treatment goals if they are able to demonstrate a clear understanding of the risks, benefits and indications for each choice. Therefore, patients are not randomized to one procedure.
5. GERD conferences will be retrospectively reviewed from March 2018 to February 2020 to identify bariatric patients with GERD who chose to undergo the TF procedure followed by the LGS or LRNGB. Thereafter, a continuing review following each GERD conference identifies patients suitable for study inclusion.
6. Patients who chose to undergo the TF to Sleeve route or who chose to undergo the LRYGB will be asked to consider consenting for their information to be part of this study. All patients who meet the proposal criteria will be approached by the study researchers until there are 60 patients enrolled in each category. Upon agreement, the patient's consent of the study will be appropriately documented.
7. Patients who choose LSG or TF to LSG will undergo screening endoscopies at the following postoperative LSG intervals: 12 months, three years, five years and 10 years.
8. A cohort of 60 patients who presented preoperatively with no evidence of GERD and underwent LSG, and who complete standard surveillance endoscopy postoperatively will be included in the study to provide a baseline from which to compare effectiveness of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TS Cohort
Patients who chose the Transoral Fundoplication TF prior to the Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy LSG procedure.
Transoral Fundoplication and Sleeve Gastrectomy
Transoral Fundoplication procedure completed prior to Sleeve Gastrectomy
RNY Cohort
Patients who chose the Laparoscopic Roux-enY Gastric Bypass procedure.
Gastric Bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
LSG Cohort
Patients with no evidence of GERD who undergo LSG and complete standard surveillance endoscopy
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transoral Fundoplication and Sleeve Gastrectomy
Transoral Fundoplication procedure completed prior to Sleeve Gastrectomy
Gastric Bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 60 bariatric patients who received or plan to have the TF procedure prior to Sleeve Gastrectomy
* 60 bariatric patients who underwent or plan to undergo Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
* Male or female
* Ages 18 or older
* Bariatric patients who have no evidence of GERD per GERD-HRQL at initial consultation or on preoperative testing.
* 60 bariatric patients who received or plan to undergo LSG and who complete surveillance endoscopy one year postoperatively
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who undergo Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass conversion from Sleeve Gastrectomy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lexington Health Incorporated
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Antonetti, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc Antonetti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lexington Health Incorporated
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lexington Health Incorporated
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barr AC, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Goldblatt MI, Gould JC. GERD and acid reduction medication use following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):410-415. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4989-4. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
DuPree CE, Blair K, Steele SR, Martin MJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease : a national analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):328-34. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4323.
Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, Mariani E, Balzarotti Canger RC, Federici S, Guerra A, Boni M. Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective multicenter comparison between early and long-term post-operative outcomes. Int J Surg. 2017 Jan;37:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.106. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
Tai CM, Huang CK. Increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and erosive esophagitis 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among obese adults. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3937. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3022-4. Epub 2013 May 25. No abstract available.
Testoni PA, Testoni S, Mazzoleni G, Vailati C, Passaretti S. Long-term efficacy of transoral incisionless fundoplication with Esophyx (Tif 2.0) and factors affecting outcomes in GERD patients followed for up to 6 years: a prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2770-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4008-6. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
Trad KS, Turgeon DG, Deljkich E. Long-term outcomes after transoral incisionless fundoplication in patients with GERD and LPR symptoms. Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):650-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1932-6. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LMC2021-1001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.