Trial Outcomes & Findings for Optimizing Movement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury (NCT NCT05363683)
NCT ID: NCT05363683
Last Updated: 2025-12-12
Results Overview
Participants completed 3 sets of 5 bilateral bodyweight squats with arms crossed at the chest, with the middle 3 of each set (9 total) averaged and reported. The external knee flexion moment was calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the knee flexion moment impulse during descent and ascent of bilateral squatting was analyzed at post-intervention. A value of 1 represents symmetric knee flexion moment impulse; a value less than 1 represents a smaller knee flexion moment impulse in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
Immediately post-intervention (within approximately 1 week after completing intervention)
2025-12-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=16 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
20.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
19.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
20.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
5 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
15 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
12 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
17 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
3 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
8 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
18 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
4 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
5 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
8 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
12 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
24 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline test; 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group did not complete the demographics survey during baseline testing.
|
|
Knee Flexion Moment Impulse at Baseline
|
0.23 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19 • n=16 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing.
|
0.26 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.16 • n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing.
|
0.25 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18 • n=33 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing.
|
|
Vertical Ground Reaction Force Impulse at Baseline
|
0.72 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=16 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing. 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group dropped after part of baseline testing was completed with no follow-up testing completed; therefore, their data was not used as a covariate in ANCOVA analyses.
|
0.72 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.12 • n=17 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing. 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group dropped after part of baseline testing was completed with no follow-up testing completed; therefore, their data was not used as a covariate in ANCOVA analyses.
|
0.72 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=33 Participants • 1 participant from the control group dropped from the study and did not complete any baseline testing. 1 participant from the squat biofeedback group dropped after part of baseline testing was completed with no follow-up testing completed; therefore, their data was not used as a covariate in ANCOVA analyses.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (within approximately 1 week after completing intervention)Participants completed 3 sets of 5 bilateral bodyweight squats with arms crossed at the chest, with the middle 3 of each set (9 total) averaged and reported. The external knee flexion moment was calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the knee flexion moment impulse during descent and ascent of bilateral squatting was analyzed at post-intervention. A value of 1 represents symmetric knee flexion moment impulse; a value less than 1 represents a smaller knee flexion moment impulse in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Flexion Moment Impulse
|
0.54 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.50 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (immediately before intervention, 2-6 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction) and 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Percent change in cartilage T2 relaxation time will be measured by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. A positive percent change represents longer (worse) T2 relaxation times at 6 months compared to baseline testing.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Participants completed 3 sets of 5 bilateral bodyweight squats with arms crossed at the chest, with the middle 3 of each set (9 total) averaged and reported. The external knee flexion moment was calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the knee flexion moment impulse during descent and ascent of bilateral squatting was analyzed at 6 months. A value of 1 represents symmetric knee flexion moment impulse; a value less than 1 represents a smaller knee flexion moment impulse in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Flexion Moment Impulse
|
0.66 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.54 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (approximately 1 week after intervention)Participants completed 3 sets of 5 bilateral bodyweight squats with arms crossed at the chest, with the middle 3 of each set (9 total) averaged and reported. The vertical ground reaction force impulse was calculated. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the vertical ground reaction force impulse during descent and ascent of bilateral squatting was analyzed at post-intervention. A value of 1 represents symmetric vertical ground reaction force impulse; a value less than 1 represents a smaller vertical ground reaction force impulse in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vertical Ground Reaction Force Impulse
|
0.91 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.84 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Participants completed 3 sets of 5 bilateral bodyweight squats with arms crossed at the chest, with the middle 3 of each set (9 total) averaged and reported. The vertical ground reaction force impulse was calculated. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the vertical ground reaction force impulse during descent and ascent of bilateral squatting was analyzed at 6 months. A value of 1 represents symmetric vertical ground reaction force impulse; a value less than 1 represents a smaller vertical ground reaction force impulse in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vertical Ground Reaction Force Impulse
|
0.95 N/A (Ratio)
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.86 N/A (Ratio)
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (within approximately 1 week after completing intervention)Participants completed 5 valid trials of walking in each limb. The external knee flexion moment was calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the peak knee flexion moment during walking was analyzed at post-intervention. A value of 1 represents symmetric peak knee flexion moment; a value less than 1 represents a smaller peak knee flexion moment in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peak Knee Flexion Moment
|
0.6 Ratio
Interval 0.2 to 0.8
|
0.7 Ratio
Interval 0.4 to 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Participants completed 5 valid trials of walking in each limb. The external knee flexion moment was calculated using an inverse dynamics approach. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of the peak knee flexion moment during walking was analyzed at 6 months. A value of 1 represents symmetric peak knee flexion moment; a value less than 1 represents a smaller peak knee flexion moment in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Peak Knee Flexion Moment
|
0.7 Ratio
Interval 0.6 to 0.9
|
0.7 Ratio
Interval 0.6 to 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (within approximately 1 week after completing intervention)Participants completed 3 trials of maximal isometric quadriceps strength testing using an isokinetic dynamometer at each limb, with the best trial in each limb used for analysis. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of maximum quadriceps strength was analyzed at post-intervention. A value of 1 represents symmetric quadriceps strength; a value less than 1 represents less quadriceps strength in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quadriceps Strength
|
0.5 Ratio
Interval 0.4 to 0.6
|
0.5 Ratio
Interval 0.5 to 0.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Participants completed 3 trials of maximal isometric quadriceps strength testing using an isokinetic dynamometer at each limb, with the best trial in each limb used for analysis. The interlimb ratio (injured limb / uninjured limb) of maximum quadriceps strength was analyzed at 6 months. A value of 1 represents symmetric quadriceps strength; a value less than 1 represents less quadriceps strength in the injured compared to uninjured limb.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biofeedback Group
n=15 Participants
Provided real-time visual feedback on a screen during bilateral squat intervention.
|
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Provided standard verbal instructions during bilateral squat intervention.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quadriceps Strength
|
0.8 Ratio
Interval 0.5 to 0.8
|
0.6 Ratio
Interval 0.6 to 0.7
|
Adverse Events
Biofeedback Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Elizabeth Wellsandt
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place