Ketorolac-an Option for Post Operative Pain Management After Elective Cardiac Surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05361824

Last Updated: 2022-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-07-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Ketorolac versus Paracetamol as an adjunct to Nalbuphine in the management of post-operative pain following elective cardiac surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized (single-blind) control trial.

SAMPLING TECHNIQUE: Computer generated, randomized selection of patients with 50% probability of assignment into either group.

PLACE AND STUDY DURATION: (single center) SICU at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Hospital, Karachi over a period of six months, from January 1, 2021 up to June 30, 2021.

METHODS: Sixty patients (30 in each group) were randomly assigned to receive either Paracetamol (control) or Ketorolac (treatment), along with the usual Nalbuphine infusion, over the first 48 hours postoperatively. The control group received injection Paracetamol 1gm six hourly, whereas treatment group received injection Ketorolac 30mg eight hourly.

PRIMARY OUTCOME: The VAS (pain score) was evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours post-extubation and a score of 4 or less was taken as a cut-off for adequate pain control.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The time taken to extubation postoperatively. The total dose of Nalbuphine administered to each patient and total chest tube drainage recorded over 48 hours postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

DATA COLLECTION: Computer randomization was done for the numbers 1 to 60, having 50% probability of being in either of two groups: Ketorolac (treatment) or Paracetamol (control).

After randomizing each number into either group, which ever patient (consenting and meeting the inclusion criteria) came, was allotted these numbers consecutively, as they presented for elective cardiac surgery. Thus randomly allocating the presenting patients into either Ketorolac/treatment (30 patients) and Paracetamol/control (30 patients).

Each patient was explained about the VAS pain rating score twice; first at preoperative interview and second time after they recovered their alert state in the SICU post operatively( at time of extubation).

The patients were taught to finger-point their intensity of pain on a line between two endpoints: marked 0 to 10. Mark at '0' meant no pain at all and '10' worst pain ever felt. The number that the patient pointed to, defined the patient's pain. For the purposes of this study "adequate pain relief" was defined as achieving a pain score of four or less, this designation was also included on the VAS scale and explained to the patients so that they may indicate numbers higher than four if they felt any pain.

Standard anaesthesia was given in the operative room, total analgesia given intra-operatively was 0.4 mg/kg Nalbuphine (not exceeding 30mg).

After completion of the surgery all patients were shifted to SICU. Initially both groups received a bolus dose of 10mg Nalbuphine and then an infusion of Nalbuphine was started at 2.5mg/hr as maintenance, up to 24 hours post-operatively. In addition, (according to randomization) the patients in treatment group received Ketorolac 30mg 8 hourly for 48 hours post-operatively and the patients control group received Paracetamol 1gm 6 hourly for 48 hours post-operatively.

Postoperative analgesia assessment using VAS was performed at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours postextubation.

Time taken to extubation, total dose of Nalbuphine administered to each patient and total chest tube drainage were also recorded over 24 hours postoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Post Operative Pain Analgesia Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Computer generated, randomized selection of patients with 50% probability of assignment into either group Treatment group : Ketorolac group Control Group: Paracetamol
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
100ml infusion bottles identical in every aspect, except a unique label on them which was only known to investigator.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketorolac

Ketorolac 30mg 8 hourly for 48 hours post-operatively

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ketorolac Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

dosage form: intravenous dosage: 30mg frequency: 8 hours apart (TDS) duration: for 48 hours post operatively

Paracetamol

Paracetamol 1gm 6 hourly for 48 hours post-operatively

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paracetamol

Intervention Type DRUG

dosage form: intravenous dosage: 1gm frequency: 6 hours apart (QID) duration: for 48 hours post operatively

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketorolac Injection

dosage form: intravenous dosage: 30mg frequency: 8 hours apart (TDS) duration: for 48 hours post operatively

Intervention Type DRUG

Paracetamol

dosage form: intravenous dosage: 1gm frequency: 6 hours apart (QID) duration: for 48 hours post operatively

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Toradol Bofalgan Provas

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females between 18 years and above of age.
* Undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Class 3 or 4.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Patients pre-planned for delayed extubation (due to moderate to severe pulmonary artery hypertension, poor right ventricular function, rhythm disturbances or unstable vitals)

* Low cardiac output (cardiac index \< 2.0 l/min/m2, using transesophageal echocardiography, intraoperatively) after weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass or paitients already having pre-op ejection fraction \< 30%.
* Patients not comfortably ventilated or oxygenated, requiring high doses of sedation and neuromuscular blockage.
* Sensitivity or allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
* History of peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding.
* Serum creatinine = 2.0 mg/dl or increase in serum creatinine of = 0.5 mg/dl or 25% within the preceding 10 days.
* Hepatic dysfunction.
* Bleeding disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pakistan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Maaida Muzaffar

Registrar Anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr Maaida Muzaffar, FCPS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pakistan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ERC-83/2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id