Increasing Implementation of Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines
NCT ID: NCT05358522
Last Updated: 2024-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26562 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-01
2023-11-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Testing a Provider-Level Feedback Intervention to Optimize Postoperative Prescribing
NCT04776928
Distribution of Medication Disposal Packets - Acute Opioid Prescribing
NCT05169281
Nudges for Opioid Reduction After Major Surgery Trial
NCT04927351
Does Altering Narcotic Prescription Methods Affect Opioid Distribution Following Select Upper Extremity Surgeries?
NCT03570320
Efficiency And Quality In Post-Surgical Pain Therapy After Discharge
NCT05221866
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With the stepped wedge design, not only will all attendings and associated prescribers ultimately receive the intervention, but by the end of the trial, each will be actively using the intervention, meaning its sustenance would occur automatically. A stepped-wedge design will be utilized, in which all clinicians begin in usual care and the order in which they adopt interventions is randomly assigned, because it has both practical and scientific advantages over traditional parallel-cluster randomized designs, in which randomization determines which clusters adopt the intervention at all. Importantly, the stepped-wedge design provides time to prepare surgical divisions for implementation of the intervention(s), enhances stakeholders' enthusiasm for participating by ensuring that each will receive the intervention(s), and typically increases statistical power. The primary analysis of study outcomes will be conducted at the patient-level. Secondary analyses will be conducted at the prescriber and attending surgeon level.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Feedback
No feedback about opioid prescribing behaviors.
No interventions assigned to this group
Opioid Prescribing Report Cards
Procedure and prescribing providers will be randomized to when they will begin receiving individual reports on their opioid prescribing.
Opioid Prescribing Report Cards
Initial comparison: Clinicians will receive an initial peer comparison feedback report by email in which their post-operative opioid prescribing for patients undergoing their top 3 procedures is compared to the guideline recommended doses and the mean prescribing doses by other University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) prescribers for each of those 3 procedures since the start of the baseline period.
Furthermore, in an attached report, for each of the 3 procedures, the mean patient reported ability to manage pain one week at home after the procedure will be displayed for those who received guideline compliant dosages of opioids relative to those who received higher than guideline recommended amounts.
Monthly comparison: On a monthly basis clinicians will get a report providing similar peer comparison feedback as above but with a monthly trend line of their performance since the start of the intervention.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Opioid Prescribing Report Cards
Initial comparison: Clinicians will receive an initial peer comparison feedback report by email in which their post-operative opioid prescribing for patients undergoing their top 3 procedures is compared to the guideline recommended doses and the mean prescribing doses by other University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) prescribers for each of those 3 procedures since the start of the baseline period.
Furthermore, in an attached report, for each of the 3 procedures, the mean patient reported ability to manage pain one week at home after the procedure will be displayed for those who received guideline compliant dosages of opioids relative to those who received higher than guideline recommended amounts.
Monthly comparison: On a monthly basis clinicians will get a report providing similar peer comparison feedback as above but with a monthly trend line of their performance since the start of the intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Procedures are eligible to be included if there are a minimum of 10 unique cases during any given month and post-operative opioids are prescribed. Data on patient reported opioid use, pain scores, and ability to manage pain is currently being collected by Penn Medicine's post-operative text messaging platform. As of February 15, 2022, there were 30 procedures defined by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) groupings that meet these criteria.
* In the research study analysis, patients will be included in the primary sample if they (1) undergo an eligible surgical procedure by an eligible attending surgeon, and (2) the proportion of guideline compliant prescriptions written during the baseline period for that procedure was less than 90%.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
M. Kit Delgado, MD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
M. Kit Delgado, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Anish Agarwal, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Zarina Ali, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Dan Lee, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
Hemming K, Taljaard M, Forbes A. Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples. Trials. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1833-7.
White H. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance-Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980;48:817-38.
Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30.
Starks MA, Sanders GD, Coeytaux RR, Riley IL, Jackson LR 2nd, Brooks AM, Thomas KL, Choudhury KR, Califf RM, Hernandez AF. Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 12;14(8):e0219894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219894. eCollection 2019.
Hogan JW, Lancaster T. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.
Agarwal AK, Ebert JP, Xiong R, Ali ZS, Lee D, Shofer F, Gitelman Y, Do D, Spencer EA, Grenader EM, Li F, Harhay MO, Delgado MK. Peer and Patient Feedback to Increase Adherence to Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 1;160(8):866-874. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1672.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
850959
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.