Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plan Block and Erector Spina Plan Block

NCT ID: NCT05344105

Last Updated: 2022-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-05

Study Completion Date

2022-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The subject of the study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversalis fascia plan block and erector spina plane block applied with ultrasonography in patients who have undergone inguinal hernia operation. The aim of the study is to compare two different regional anesthesia methods applied in the postoperative period in terms of 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores, additional analgesic need, and side effects and complications in the postoperative period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An identification number (ID) number will be randomly assigned to each patient, whose written consent was obtained before the surgery, when they are admitted to the postoperative recovery room. In the postoperative period, patients will be followed up with these numbers in patient follow-up. Which group the patients will be included in will be determined by the closed envelope method.

The anesthetist, who will perform the regional block, will give the block to be applied in a sealed envelope by an assistant staff outside the study, and at the same time, the patient will not know which block has been made. The anesthesiologist who made the block will not participate in the pain follow-up of the patients. Postoperative pain assessment and data collection will be performed by another investigator blinded to the study.

Spinal anesthesia will be applied to all patients and inguinal hernia operation will be appropriate. Patients taken to the recovery room will be divided into two groups. Transversalis fascia plan block (Group T) will be applied to the patients in a group after local cleansing of the skin area, accompanied by ultrasonography. The patients in the other group will be treated with an erector spina plane block (Group E) following local cleansing of the skin area, accompanied by ultrasonography.

In both block management, 0.25% bupivacaine (Buvasin Vem İlaç, Turkey) (15 ml physiological saline + 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine) total amount of 30 ml, same volume and same concentration will be used.

After the block procedure, the patient will be observed in the recovery room for side effects. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) will be used as a standard in the treatment of postoperative pain in patients in both groups without any complications. Tramadol HCL, which is routinely used for postoperative pain control for PCA, will be used (3 mg/ml, total volume 100 mL).

Evaluation of postoperative pain will be done with numerical rating scale (NRS).Pain levels will be questioned in two different ways as rest and cough.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
The patient will not know which study group he is in. The anesthetist, who will perform the regional block, will give the block to be applied in a sealed envelope by an assistant staff outside the study, and at the same time, the patient will not know which block has been made. The anesthesiologist who made the block will not participate in the pain follow-up of the patients. Postoperative pain assessment and data collection will be performed by another investigator blinded to the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transversalis fascia plan block (Group T)

After local cleaning of the skin area, the transducer will be placed on the iliac crest in the transverse plane with a low-frequency convex probe, and the skin, subcutaneous tissue, external oblique muscle will be placed with a 20 G, 100 mm needle. After visualization of the internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscles and finally the deep fascia of the transversus abdominis, local anesthetic will be given unilaterally between the last part of the transversus abdominis muscle and the transversalis fascia with the out-off plan technique.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy) device will be used while blocking in both groups.

Erector spina plan block (Group E)

After local cleaning of the skin area, a convex probe is determined to be placed longitudinally 3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the T11 vertebra, after determining the erector spina muscle, with a 20 G, 100 mm needle inplane method in the craniocaudal direction will be advanced and a local anesthetic will be administered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy) device will be used while blocking in both groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy)

A low frequency convex probe (ESAOTE Fixed Color Doppler Ultrasonography Device, Italy) device will be used while blocking in both groups.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Those who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia surgery under elective conditions
* 18-65 years
* ASA I-III
* Patients with written consent who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index \> 35 kg/m²,
* Coagulopathy and local infection or hematoma in the area to be blocked,
* Allergic to a local anesthetic agent or one of the drugs used in the study,
* Those with a history of chronic opioid and corticosteroid use,
* Unable to use the patient-controlled analgesia system,
* Those with psychiatric illness,
* Cases with a surgical time of less than 30 minutes and more than 120 minutes for better standardization of studies,
* Patients who do not agree to participate in the study will not be included in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsun Education and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hale Kefeli Celik

Principal Investigator, Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mustafa Suren, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Samsun Research and Education Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samsun Research and Education Hospital

Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El-Emam EM, El Motlb EAA. Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae versus Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Inguinal Surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):274-279. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_81_19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31198244 (View on PubMed)

Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29913392 (View on PubMed)

Fouad AZ, Abdel-Aal IRM, Gadelrab MRMA, Mohammed HMES. Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for post-operative analgesia in inguinal hernia repair. Korean J Pain. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):201-209. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.2.201.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33785672 (View on PubMed)

Celik HK, Tulgar S, Buk OF, Koc K, Unal M, Genc C, Suren M. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr;77(2):255-264. doi: 10.4097/kja.23404. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38185619 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIMAY55

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESPB and ACB in Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05613101 COMPLETED NA