Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Riociguat in Incipient Pulmonary Vascular Disease as an Indicator for Early PAH (NCT NCT05339087)
NCT ID: NCT05339087
Last Updated: 2026-01-21
Results Overview
Change in pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
TERMINATED
PHASE2
35 participants
baseline, 24 weeks
2026-01-21
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at 6 study centres between October 2022 and May 2025. The first participant was enrolled on 24 October 2022, the last on 30 May 2025.
Overall, 35 participants met the eligibility criteria and were randomized to treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Riociguat
Riociguat oral tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
17
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Visit 2
|
13
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Visit 3
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Riociguat
Riociguat oral tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Early study termination
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Systolic blood pressure mesurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=17 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily) The dose was individually adjusted in accordance with the in-label titration regimen based on the systemic blood pressure of the patient, the subjects and physicians' subjective estimation and occurrence of adverse reactions. At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and continued for the rest of the study treatment phase
|
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo oral tablet matching riociguat: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
Total
n=35 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.18 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27 • n=17 Participants
|
65.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.64 • n=18 Participants
|
65.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.86 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Height
|
161.94 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.28 • n=17 Participants
|
163.33 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.14 • n=18 Participants
|
162.66 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
69.91 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=17 Participants
|
66.84 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.64 • n=18 Participants
|
68.37 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.20 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Duration of pulmonary hypertension (PH)
|
0.06 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24 • n=17 Participants
|
0.56 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65 • n=18 Participants
|
0.31 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.21 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Vital signs - Systolic blood pressure
|
132.25 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.88 • n=16 Participants • Systolic blood pressure mesurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
119.50 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.27 • n=16 Participants • Systolic blood pressure mesurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
125.88 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.09 • n=32 Participants • Systolic blood pressure mesurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Vital signs - Diastolic blood pressure
|
77.13 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.56 • n=16 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
73.31 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25 • n=16 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
75.22 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.45 • n=32 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Vial signs - Heart rate
|
75.69 beats/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13 • n=16 Participants • Heart rate measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
73.44 beats/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82 • n=16 Participants • Heart rate measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
74.56 beats/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41 • n=32 Participants • Heart rate measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Vital signs - Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
|
97.25 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=16 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
96.56 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41 • n=16 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
96.91 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 • n=32 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm and one patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC)
I
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC)
II
|
16 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC)
III
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC)
IV
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) Etiology
Idiopathic
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) Etiology
Heritable
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) Etiology
CTD-associated
|
15 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) Etiology
other
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Treated arterial hypertension
|
12 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Dyslipidemia
|
6 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Treated coronary heart disease
|
1 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Diabetes mellitus
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Mild interstitial lung disease
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Mild obstructive lung disease
|
5 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Thyroid dysfunction
|
7 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Iron deficiency
|
5 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Oesophagus disease
|
4 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Degenerative bone disease
|
7 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Osteoporosis
|
2 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)- limited cutaneous SSc
|
6 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) - diffuse cutaneous SSc
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) - other subtypes
|
6 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - Sjögren Syndrome
|
3 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - Mixed connective tissue disease
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Concomitant diseases
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases - other
|
3 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Blood gas analysis - Saturation of Arterial Oxygen (SaO2)
|
95.70 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=12 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
95.97 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53 • n=14 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
95.74 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56 • n=26 Participants • SpO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Blood gas analysis - Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
|
75.57 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.60 • n=12 Participants • PaO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
79.02 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 • n=14 Participants • PaO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
78.88 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.14 • n=26 Participants • PaO2 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Blood gas analysis - Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)
|
34.09 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.54 • n=14 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
36.37 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92 • n=12 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
36.02 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92 • n=26 Participants • Diastolic blood pressure measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Blood gas analysis - pH
|
7.41 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.01 • n=12 Participants • pH measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
7.43 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.02 • n=14 Participants • pH measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
7.42 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.02 • n=26 Participants • pH measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Blood gas analysis - bicarbonates
|
22.34 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.76 • n=12 Participants • Bicarbonate measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm
|
24.65 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.25 • n=14 Participants • Bicarbonate measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm
|
23.36 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64 • n=26 Participants • Bicarbonate measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and 5 patients in the riociguat arm
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - Right Arterial Pressure (RAP)
|
6.71 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.12 • n=17 Participants
|
5.28 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85 • n=18 Participants
|
5.97 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (sPAP)
|
36.88 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33 • n=17 Participants
|
36.61 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.85 • n=18 Participants
|
36.74 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (dPAP)
|
15.47 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.94 • n=17 Participants
|
14.44 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.25 • n=18 Participants
|
14.94 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP)
|
24.06 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.56 • n=17 Participants
|
23.67 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.87 • n=18 Participants
|
23.86 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)
|
9.83 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.59 • n=17 Participants
|
10.18 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27 • n=18 Participants
|
10.00 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.98 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - cardiac output (CO)
|
4.62 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 • n=17 Participants
|
4.70 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 • n=18 Participants
|
4.66 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - cardiac index (CI)
|
2.70 l/min/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43 • n=17 Participants
|
2.74 l/min/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64 • n=18 Participants
|
2.72 l/min/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.51 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
|
3.09 WU
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 • n=17 Participants
|
2.93 WU
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59 • n=18 Participants
|
3.01 WU
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Hemodynamics at rest - Venous Oxygen Saturation (SVO2)
|
72.53 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24 • n=17 Participants
|
59.89 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=18 Participants
|
71.17 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.87 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Six-minute walking distance (6MWD) test - 6MWD
|
431.13 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.24 • n=16 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
387.11 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.94 • n=18 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
407.82 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 72.42 • n=34 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Six-minute walking distance (6MWD) test - Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) (test end)
|
87.94 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.22 • n=16 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
89.39 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61 • n=18 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
88.71 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.42 • n=34 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Six-minute walking distance (6MWD) test - Borg dyspnea score
|
3.53 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35 • n=16 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
2.69 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83 • n=18 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
3.09 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.10 • n=34 Participants • 6MWD of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Physical functioning
|
59.38 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.66 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
59.17 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.28 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
59.26 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.10 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Physical role function
|
48.44 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.30 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
31.94 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.10 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
39.71 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.66 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Pain
|
63.56 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.81 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
62.78 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.83 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
63.15 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.94 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)
|
2.37 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41 • n=17 Participants
|
2.30 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48 • n=18 Participants
|
2.33 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - General health perception
|
51.88 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.89 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
53.06 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.67 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
52.50 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.74 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Vitality
|
40.31 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.01 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
46.11 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.62 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
43.38 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.25 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Social functioning
|
65.06 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.59 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
72.39 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.05 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
68.94 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.20 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Lung function - Diffusion limited carbon monoxide (DLCO)
|
62.15 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47 • n=13 Participants • DLCO measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
56.01 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.00 • n=11 Participants • DLCO measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
58.83 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15 • n=24 Participants • DLCO measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Emotional role function
|
47.94 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.12 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
38.89 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.97 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
43.15 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.30 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Mental well-being
|
63.50 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.64 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
65.33 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.70 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
64.47 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.41 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Physical summation score
|
52.50 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.19 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
50.56 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.36 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
51.47 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.62 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Short Form-36 Health Survey - Mental summation score
|
53.75 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.92 • n=16 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
55.22 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.44 • n=18 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
54.53 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.92 • n=34 Participants • The SF-36 survey of 16 patients in the riociguat arm and 18 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 1 patient in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - Estimated Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure (sPAP)
|
35.06 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.58 • n=17 Participants • sPAP estimates of 17 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm.
|
31.94 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.34 • n=16 Participants • sPAP estimates of 17 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm.
|
33.55 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52 • n=33 Participants • sPAP estimates of 17 patients in the riociguat arm and 16 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 2 patients in the placebo arm.
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - right atrial (RA) area
|
12.47 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.04 • n=17 Participants
|
13.56 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.66 • n=18 Participants
|
13.03 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.86 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - right ventricular (RV) area
|
12.53 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85 • n=15 Participants • RV area measurements of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 2 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
13.64 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.65 • n=14 Participants • RV area measurements of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 2 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
13.07 cm2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.76 • n=29 Participants • RV area measurements of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 2 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - left ventricular eccentricity index (LV-EI)
|
1.64 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41 • n=14 Participants • LV-EI of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 6 patients in the placebo arm and for 3 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
1.00 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.00 • n=12 Participants • LV-EI of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 6 patients in the placebo arm and for 3 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
1.35 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 • n=26 Participants • LV-EI of 15 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm was analysed. Values were missing for 6 patients in the placebo arm and for 3 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Echocardiography at rest - Left ventricular ejection fraction
|
62.82 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.65 • n=17 Participants
|
65.28 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.84 • n=18 Participants
|
64.09 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.28 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Lung function - Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
|
92.18 L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.54 • n=12 Participants • FVC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
88.80 L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.22 • n=13 Participants • FVC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
90.42 L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.37 • n=25 Participants • FVC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Lung function - Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)
|
93.87 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.80 • n=12 Participants • FEV1 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
90.90 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.74 • n=13 Participants • FEV1 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
92.32 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.05 • n=25 Participants • FEV1 measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 13 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 5 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Lung function - total lung capacity (TLC)
|
96.71 percent (predicted)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68 • n=12 Participants • TLC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
87.45 percent (predicted)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97 • n=11 Participants • TLC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
92.28 percent (predicted)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.48 • n=23 Participants • TLC measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Lung function - Residual volume
|
99.48 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.41 • n=11 Participants • Residual Volume measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
88.54 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.67 • n=12 Participants • Residual Volume measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
94.25 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.59 • n=23 Participants • Residual Volume measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 11 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 7 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Lung function - Diffusion limited carbon monoxide/alevolar volume (DLCO/VA)
|
67.15 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25 • n=2 Participants • DLCO/VA of 2 patients in the riociguat arm and 5 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 13 patients in the placebo arm and for 15 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
72.52 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.51 • n=5 Participants • DLCO/VA of 2 patients in the riociguat arm and 5 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 13 patients in the placebo arm and for 15 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
70.99 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.12 • n=7 Participants • DLCO/VA of 2 patients in the riociguat arm and 5 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 13 patients in the placebo arm and for 15 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - Hemoglobin
|
13.23 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81 • n=12 Participants • Hemoglobin measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
13.29 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71 • n=15 Participants • Hemoglobin measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
13.26 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 • n=27 Participants • Hemoglobin measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - Creatinine
|
0.73 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15 • n=12 Participants • Creatinine measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
0.84 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24 • n=15 Participants • Creatinine measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
0.79 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.21 • n=27 Participants • Creatinine measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - Urea
|
25.82 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68 • n=11 Participants • Urea measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
30.53 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.61 • n=15 Participants • Urea measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
28.54 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.96 • n=26 Participants • Urea measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - Uric acid
|
4.49 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81 • n=11 Participants • Uric acid measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
4.93 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.10 • n=14 Participants • Uric acid measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
4.74 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65 • n=25 Participants • Uric acid measurements of 11 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 6 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)
|
18.25 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.22 • n=12 Participants • SGPT measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
22.27 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.74 • n=15 Participants • SGPT measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
20.48 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.28 • n=27 Participants • SGPT measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - C-reactive protein (CRP)
|
3.27 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23 • n=12 Participants • CRP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
6.15 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.50 • n=14 Participants • CRP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
4.82 mg/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.48 • n=26 Participants • CRP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 14 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 4 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
|
Laboratory - N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)
|
331.08 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 361.44 • n=12 Participants • NTproBNP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
316.73 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 342.13 • n=15 Participants • NTproBNP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
323.11 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 344.02 • n=27 Participants • NTproBNP measurements of 12 patients in the riociguat arm and 15 patients in the placebo arm were analysed. Values were missing for 3 patients in the placebo arm and for 5 patients in the riociguat arm.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
|
-0.69 WU
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.89 WU
Standard Deviation 3.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Cardiac Index (CI) at Rest From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.21 l/min/m2
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
-0.07 l/min/m2
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization Hierarchical testing of secondary endpoints stopped after first step.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Total Pulmonary Resistance (TPR) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.51 mmHg·min/L
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
-0.21 mmHg·min/L
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change assessed by lung function tests. Hierarchical testing of secondary endpoints stopped after first step.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=11 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Diffusion Capacity of the Lung (DLCO) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
1.16 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
0.09 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 7.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walking distance test Hierarchical testing of secondary endpoints stopped after first step.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=16 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in 6-minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
|
23 m
Standard Deviation 56.41
|
24 m
Standard Deviation 43.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change of WHO functional class, change score The World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) describes the severity of pulmonary hypertension (PH) symptoms. FC I is considered the mildest and FC IV the most severe form of PH.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=16 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Improvement
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Worsening
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Unchanged
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures.
Change of WHO functional class, change score The World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC) describes the severity of pulmonary hypertension (PH) symptoms. FC I is considered the mildest and FC IV the most severe form of PH.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=13 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 12 Weeks
Improvement (-1)
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 12 Weeks
Unchanged
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Change of World Health Organization- Functional Class (WHO-FC) From Baseline at 12 Weeks
Worsening (+1)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed using the Short Form (SF) 36-questionnaire. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale, i.e. a score of 0 is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. Sections: vitality; physical functioning; bodily pain; general health perceptions; physical role functioning; emotional role functioning; social role functioning; mental health. Two summation scores, physical and mental summation score, were calculated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=15 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Emotional role function
|
15.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 48.59
|
40.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 58.02
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Physical functioning
|
4.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.38
|
2.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.61
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Physical role function
|
-5.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.33
|
31.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 53.00
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Pain
|
-1.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.35
|
9.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.51
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
General health perception
|
-5.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.67
|
0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.37
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Vitality
|
-1.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.47
|
5.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.09
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Social functioning
|
1.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88
|
6.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.78
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Mental well-being
|
2.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.36
|
4.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.84
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Physical summation score
|
-1.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.89
|
9.73 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.39
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
Mental summation score
|
2.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.97
|
11.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.32
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Lung function and lung diffusing capacity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=3 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=5 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.37 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
1.04 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 5.99
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Lung function and lung diffusing capacity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Total Lung Capacity (TLC) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
-4.70 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 12.66
|
-0.91 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Lung function and lung diffusing capacity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=11 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diffusing Capacity of the Lung (DLCO)
|
0.09 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 7.40
|
1.16 percent predicted
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by echocardiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=15 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Systolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (sPAP) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
-5.20 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.26
|
-3.42 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.06
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in right ventricular area (RV-area) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by echocardiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=15 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Right Ventricular Area (RV-area) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.00 cm2
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-1.33 cm2
Standard Deviation 1.97
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in right atrial area (RA-area) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by echocardiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=16 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Right Atrial Area (RA-area) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.38 cm2
Standard Deviation 3.34
|
-0.68 cm2
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by echocardiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=16 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
0.15 cm
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
-0.08 cm
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in left ventricular eccentricity index (LV-EI) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by echocardiography. LV-EI is the ratio of septical-parallel to septical-perdendicular left ventricular diameters in parasternal short-axis view; normal = 1, increased (≥ 1.1) indicates right ventricular pressure/volume overload
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Left Ventricular Eccentricity Index (LV-EI) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
-0.62 index
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
0.00 index
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
blood analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=9 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro BNP) From Baseline at 12 Weeks
|
-116,3333 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 229,11951
|
-8,7273 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 212,47545
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
blood analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro BNP) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
-86.50 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 246.40
|
-4.57 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 251.30
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) from baseline at 24 weeks assessed by blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Oxygen Partial Pressure (PaO2) From Baseline at 24 Weeks
|
-2.83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.99
|
-3.38 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.22
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure (PCO2)
|
0.48 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
-0.83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change oxygen saturation of the blood (SaO2) assessed by blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change Oxygen Saturation of the Blood (SaO2)
|
-0.36 percent SaO2
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
-0.87 percent SaO2
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline,24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in pH
|
0.01 pH
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.00 pH
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures.
blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Bicarbonates
|
0.80 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
-0.43 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Change in base excess assessed by blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=12 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Base Excess
|
0.74 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
-0.34 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Systolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (sPAP)
|
-2.36 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.22
|
-3.00 mmHg
Standard Deviation 5.72
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)
|
-1.43 mmHg
Standard Deviation 5.2
|
-1.60 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.39
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in dPAP (Diastolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure)
|
-1.43 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.16
|
-0.27 mmHg
Standard Deviation 4.43
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in PAWP (Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure)
|
1.36 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
-0.53 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.14
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in RAP (Right Atrial Pressure)
|
0.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
0.33 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
Pulmonary hemodynamics assessed by right heart catheterization
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cardiac Output and Ejection Fraction (CO)
|
0.35 L/min
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.19 L/min
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeksPopulation: All randomized participants were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat population). The number of analyzed paticipants may vary due to missing data for specific outcome measures. The per-protocol set is identical to the intention-to-treat set, as no major protocol deviations occurred and all participants met the predefined eligibility criteria.
blood gas analysis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=14 Participants
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Central Venous Saturation (SvO2)
|
1.07 percent SvO2
Standard Deviation 11.02
|
3.20 percent SvO2
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
Adverse Events
Riociguat
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=17 participants at risk
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal bleeding
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Knee endoprothesis
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Commotio cerebri
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Riociguat
n=17 participants at risk
Riociguat Oral Tablet: Riociguat Oral Tablet (1 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg or 2.5 mg three times daily): individually adjusted dose in accordance with the in-label titration regimen (maximum dosage of 2.5mg tid). At week 8, the maintenance dose was established and maintained for the rest of study participation.
|
Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Placebo oral tablets: Sham titration and adjustment to maintenance dose (tid) according to individual tolerability as in the experimental arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Reflux
|
29.4%
5/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain
|
23.5%
4/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
29.4%
5/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bloating
|
0.00%
0/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Emesis
|
11.8%
2/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
17.6%
3/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
17.6%
3/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Headache
|
35.3%
6/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fatigue
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Infections (any)
|
52.9%
9/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COVID-19
|
17.6%
3/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
23.5%
4/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Dizziness
|
17.6%
3/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
38.9%
7/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Edema
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
11.1%
2/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
|
11.8%
2/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
29.4%
5/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
33.3%
6/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract infection
|
5.9%
1/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
|
General disorders
Night sweats
|
11.8%
2/17 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected from baseline until safety follow-up (30 ± 14 days after last intake of study drug). With a treatment phase of 24 weeks (± 14 days), the overall adverse event data collection period corresponds to approximately 28 weeks.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor has first publication rights, intended to be a joint, multi-center publication. Subsequent publications by Institution and/or Investigator require at least 60-day sponsor review. Sponsor may remove any information considered confidential and/or proprietary or would hinder the marketing authorization holder in the further development of the Investigational Product. Sponsor may request changes or delay (max 180 days) if patentability is affected. Scientific neutrality must be preserved.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER