Trial Outcomes & Findings for Support Via Technology: Living and Learning With Advancing FTD (NCT NCT05338710)
NCT ID: NCT05338710
Last Updated: 2025-11-25
Results Overview
The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)
2025-11-25
Participant Flow
We were able to recruit 16 participants
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
There is one intervention group that received the STELLA-FTD intervention. The behavioral intervention was provided to participants and outcomes were measured prior to and after the intervention within the same group.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intervention Group
There is one intervention group that received the STELLA-FTD intervention. The behavioral intervention was provided to participants and outcomes were measured prior to and after the intervention within the same group.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Support Via Technology: Living and Learning With Advancing FTD
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=16 Participants
This group received the STELLA-FTD intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.61 • n=45 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
16 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Rural Status
Metropolitan
|
14 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Rural Status
Rural
|
2 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Care Recipient
Bv-FTD
|
7 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Care Recipient
PPA
|
7 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Care Recipient
PSP
|
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of Care Recipient
Unknown
|
1 Participants
n=45 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: thirteen individuals completed this prior to intervention
The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC)
Pre intervention, behavior frequency
|
28.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
|
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC)
Post intervention; behavior frequency
|
25.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.3
|
|
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC)
Pre-intervention, reactivity
|
16.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
|
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist (RMBPC)
Post intervention, reactivity
|
15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: Higher scores= better QoL
This is a brief, 13-item measure designed specifically to obtain a rating of the caregiver's Quality of Life. The measure focuses on quality of life domains. It uses simple and straightforward language and responses \& includes assessments of the individual's relationships with friends and family, concerns about finances, physical condition, mood, and an overall assessment of life quality. The total range is 13 to 52 with lower scores indicating worse quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease, Care Partner
QoL, care partners pre
|
37.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
|
Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease, Care Partner
QoL, care partners, post
|
36.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Measures caregiver self-efficacy for symptoms management and community support service use. Scale 10-100, higher scores indicating better sense of self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Family Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
Self-efficacy pre
|
61.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8
|
|
Family Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale
Self-efficacy post
|
62.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: Depression assessed prior to and after study
This is a 10-item scale that measures depression; the range is 0 (no depression) to 30 (severe depression).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression
CESD pre
|
10.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.78
|
|
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression
CESD post
|
11.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: higher scores=higher grief
Caregiver grief; Scale 18-90, higher scores=worse grief
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index
MMCGI pre
|
54.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
|
Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index
MMCGI post
|
55.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (at Week 1) and Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: higher scores=greater guilt
The CGQ is a 22-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale designed to measure guilt in caregivers with response options from 0 (never) to 4 (always or almost always). Items are organized into five main subscales that are scored by computing the sum of the scores of the items belonging to the corresponding scale. "Guilt about doing wrong by the care recipient" includes 7 items with a score range of 0-28. "Guilt about failing to meet the challenges of caregiving" includes 6 items with item #6 being reverse scored. The score ranges from 0-24. "Guilt about self-care" includes 4 items with a score range of 0-16. "Guilt about neglecting other relatives" includes 2 items with a score range of 0-8. "Guilt about having negative feelings towards other people" includes 3 items with a score range of 0-12. The total score on the CGQ consists of the sum of the scores of all the subscales, with a total score ranging from 0-88. A higher total score reflects greater guilt.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Negative feelings towards others pre
|
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.92
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Negative feelings post
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Neglecting other relatives, pre
|
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Neglecting others post
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
self care efficacy pre
|
4.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Self care efficacy post
|
4.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.21
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
failing to meet challenges pre
|
6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Failing post
|
5.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.88
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Doing wrong by care recipient pre
|
9.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.72
|
|
Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ)
Doing wrong post
|
10.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-Intervention (at Week 8)Population: Count of items
Caregiver assessment of program
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Experience Survey
I feel confident that I can use STELLA-FTD skills to manage upsetting behaviors
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
It was easy for me to attend
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
I could find a safe activity for my family member
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
It was easy to connect via Webex
|
12 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
I had good tech support
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
Overall, I was satisfied with the STELLA-FTD experience
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
I could talk openly with the professionals
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
I liked working with other care partners
|
13 participants
|
|
Experience Survey
I discuss sensitive topics with other care partners
|
11 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-Intervention (at Week 1)The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a 10-item self-report measure of five personality domains: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Openness to Experiences. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Disagree strongly") to 7 ("Agree strongly"). Items 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 are reverse-scored. For this study, items were summed to create a total personality score. Possible total scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating stronger endorsement of personality characteristics across the five domains (i.e., higher trait expression).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)
|
51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-Intervention (at Week 8)The Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess an individual's sleep hygiene practices. It's a tool used in research and clinical settings to evaluate sleep habits and identify potential areas for improvement. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Total scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score representing poorer sleep hygiene.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Sleep Hygiene Index
|
10.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-Intervention (at Week 8)A 9-item measure to assess whether caregivers contacted other caregivers or not.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=13 Participants
received STELLA-FTD
|
|---|---|
|
Contact Survey
Number who did not contact other caregivers
|
11 Participants
|
|
Contact Survey
Number who contacted others
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place