A Systems Approach to Immunotherapy Biomarker Identification Within the Postoperative Wound-Healing Microenvironment in Patients With Gastroesophageal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05338060
Last Updated: 2025-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-26
2026-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomarker Analysis of Gastrointestinal Cancer
NCT01484444
Early Detection and Post-operative Monitoring of Gastric Cancer
NCT06232395
Gastric Cancer Marker Detection and Its Kit Development
NCT05010863
Study of Blood and Tissue Samples From Patients With Stomach Cancer, Esophageal Cancer, or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
NCT00963092
Liquid Biopsy in Monitoring the Therapeutic Efficacy of Targeted Therapy in Advanced/Metastatic Gastric Cancer
NCT02610218
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
prospective collection of surgical exudates (SEs)
prospective collection of surgical exudates (SEs) from patients who are hospitalized for post-operative recovery from esophagectomy or gastrectomy for gastroesophageal cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult males and females at least 18 years of age
* Ability to complete testing in the protocol and attend study visits
* Able and willing to consent to protocol
* Adequate organ function Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 103/μL Platelets ≥100 x 103/μL Hemoglobin \>9.0 g/dL Total Bilirubin (\</= 2.0 mg/dl at time of Y90 radioembolization) AST/ALT ≤5 x upper limit of normal Albumin \>3 g/dL Creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant illness that would prevent adequate patient assessment or in the investigators' opinion pose an added risk for study participants.
* Life-threatening intercurrent illness
* Anticipated poor compliance
* Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated
* Persons with decisional incapacity/cognitive impairment
* Any history or evidence of severe illness or any other condition that would make the patient, in the opinion of the investigator unsuitable for the study
* Subject is enrolled in a separate interventional clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
George Mason University
OTHER
Inova Health Care Services
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Raymond Wadlow, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maleki Vareki S, Garrigos C, Duran I. Biomarkers of response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Aug;116:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Dholaria B, Hammond W, Shreders A, Lou Y. Emerging therapeutic agents for lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2016 Dec 9;9(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0365-z.
Diggs LP, Hsueh EC. Utility of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for predicting PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor response. Biomark Res. 2017 Mar 15;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s40364-017-0093-8. eCollection 2017.
Grigg C, Rizvi NA. PD-L1 biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: truth or fiction? J Immunother Cancer. 2016 Aug 16;4:48. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0153-x. eCollection 2016.
Sundaram GM, Quah S, Sampath P. Cancer: the dark side of wound healing. FEBS J. 2018 Dec;285(24):4516-4534. doi: 10.1111/febs.14586. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
Fuse N, Nagahisa-Oku E, Doi T, Sasaki T, Nomura S, Kojima T, Yano T, Tahara M, Yoshino T, Ohtsu A. Effect of RECIST revision on classification of target lesions and overall response in advanced gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer. 2013 Jul;16(3):324-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-012-0187-9. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
Schwartz LH, Colville JA, Ginsberg MS, Wang L, Mazumdar M, Kalaigian J, Hricak H, Ilson D, Schwartz GK. Measuring tumor response and shape change on CT: esophageal cancer as a paradigm. Ann Oncol. 2006 Jun;17(6):1018-23. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl058. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
Pierobon M, Wulfkuhle J, Liotta L, Petricoin E. Application of molecular technologies for phosphoproteomic analysis of clinical samples. Oncogene. 2015 Feb 12;34(7):805-14. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.16. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
Baldelli E, Calvert V, Hodge A, VanMeter A, Petricoin EF 3rd, Pierobon M. Reverse Phase Protein Microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1606:149-169. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6990-6_11.
Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003 Mar 13;422(6928):198-207. doi: 10.1038/nature01511.
Poste G. Bring on the biomarkers. Nature. 2011 Jan 13;469(7329):156-7. doi: 10.1038/469156a. No abstract available.
Gerszten RE, Accurso F, Bernard GR, Caprioli RM, Klee EW, Klee GG, Kullo I, Laguna TA, Roth FP, Sabatine M, Srinivas P, Wang TJ, Ware LB. Challenges in translating plasma proteomics from bench to bedside: update from the NHLBI Clinical Proteomics Programs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008 Jul;295(1):L16-22. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00044.2008. Epub 2008 May 2.
Prakash A, Rezai T, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Athanas M, Russo P, Zhang H, Tian Y, Li Y, Kulasingam V, Drabovich A, Smith CR, Batruch I, Oran PE, Fredolini C, Luchini A, Liotta L, Petricoin E, Diamandis EP, Chan DW, Nelson R, Lopez MF. Interlaboratory reproducibility of selective reaction monitoring assays using multiple upfront analyte enrichment strategies. J Proteome Res. 2012 Aug 3;11(8):3986-95. doi: 10.1021/pr300014s. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Luchini A, Fredolini C, Espina BH, Meani F, Reeder A, Rucker S, Petricoin EF 3rd, Liotta LA. Nanoparticle technology: addressing the fundamental roadblocks to protein biomarker discovery. Curr Mol Med. 2010 Mar;10(2):133-41. doi: 10.2174/156652410790963268.
Fredolini C, Meani F, Luchini A, Zhou W, Russo P, Ross M, Patanarut A, Tamburro D, Gambara G, Ornstein D, Odicino F, Ragnoli M, Ravaggi A, Novelli F, Collura D, D'Urso L, Muto G, Belluco C, Pecorelli S, Liotta L, Petricoin EF 3rd. Investigation of the ovarian and prostate cancer peptidome for candidate early detection markers using a novel nanoparticle biomarker capture technology. AAPS J. 2010 Dec;12(4):504-18. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9211-3. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
Pin E, Sjoberg R, Andersson E, Hellstrom C, Olofsson J, Jernbom Falk A, Bergstrom S, Remnestal J, Just D, Nilsson P, Manberg A. Array-Based Profiling of Proteins and Autoantibody Repertoires in CSF. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;2044:303-318. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9706-0_19.
Park CH, Lee JG, Lee AR, Eun CS, Han DS. Network construction of gastric microbiome and organization of microbial modules associated with gastric carcinogenesis. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 27;9(1):12444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48925-4.
Popper U, Rumpold H. Update ESMO: gastric and esophageal cancer. memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology. 2021;14:180-3.
Shitara K, Ozguroglu M, Bang YJ, Di Bartolomeo M, Mandala M, Ryu MH, Fornaro L, Olesinski T, Caglevic C, Chung HC, Muro K, Goekkurt E, Mansoor W, McDermott RS, Shacham-Shmueli E, Chen X, Mayo C, Kang SP, Ohtsu A, Fuchs CS; KEYNOTE-061 investigators. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):123-133. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31257-1. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, Francois E, Adenis A, Hsu CH, Doi T, Moriwaki T, Kim SB, Lee SH, Bennouna J, Kato K, Shen L, Enzinger P, Qin SK, Ferreira P, Chen J, Girotto G, de la Fouchardiere C, Senellart H, Al-Rajabi R, Lordick F, Wang R, Suryawanshi S, Bhagia P, Kang SP, Metges JP; KEYNOTE-181 Investigators. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4138-4148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01888. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, Okada M, Lin CY, Chin K, Kadowaki S, Ahn MJ, Hamamoto Y, Doki Y, Yen CC, Kubota Y, Kim SB, Hsu CH, Holtved E, Xynos I, Kodani M, Kitagawa Y. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1506-1517. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30626-6. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
Moehler M, Shitara K, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, Wyrwicz L, et al. LBA6_PR Nivolumab (nivo) plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): First results of the CheckMate 649 study. Annals of Oncology. 2020;31:S1191.
Kato K, Sun JM, Shah MA, Enzinger PC, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. LBA8_PR Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study. Annals of Oncology. 2020;31:S1192-S3.
Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, Mendez G, Feliciano J, Motoyama S, Lievre A, Uronis H, Elimova E, Grootscholten C, Geboes K, Zafar S, Snow S, Ko AH, Feeney K, Schenker M, Kocon P, Zhang J, Zhu L, Lei M, Singh P, Kondo K, Cleary JM, Moehler M; CheckMate 577 Investigators. Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1;384(13):1191-1203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U21-05-4450
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.