A Patient-Centered Communication Tool (UR-GOAL) Versus Usual Care for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Their Caregivers, and Their Oncologists

NCT ID: NCT05335369

Last Updated: 2025-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-17

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to conduct a pilot randomized trial to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the UR-GOAL tool in improving SDM and communication between 100 older patients with AML and their oncologists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators have developed a patient-centered communication tool (University of Rochester-Geriatric Oncology assessment for Acute myeloid Leukemia or UR-GOAL) that 1) conducts assessments of fitness, 2) elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and 3) elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video. The investigators have refined the tool based on feedback from stakeholders consisting of older patients with cancer, caregivers, and oncologists. This was further adapted in a qualitative study of 15 older patients with AML. In a single arm pilot study, the investigators have demonstrated feasibility of recruiting older patients with newly diagnosed AML to a single arm study, as well as their caregivers and oncologists.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The UR-GOAL 1) conducts assessments of fitness, 2) elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and 3) elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual care

Usual care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

UR-GOAL

UR-GOAL helps conducts assessments of fitness, elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

UR-GOAL

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

UR-GOAL helps conducts assessments of fitness, elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

UR-GOAL

UR-GOAL helps conducts assessments of fitness, elicits patient values via Best-Worst Scaling, and elicits preferences for prognostic information and assesses prognostic awareness. The tool also includes an AML educational video.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients

1. Age ≥60 years
2. Newly diagnosed AML or being worked up for possible AML
3. Able to provide informed consent
4. Agreement of their oncologist to participate in the study
5. English-speaking

If patients screen positive for cognitive impairment on the Mini-Cog test performed as part of the baseline assessment, they can still enroll if they are able to provide informed consent and have decision making capacity as determined by their treating oncologist

Caregivers

1. Selected by the patient when asked if there is a "family member, partner, friend or caregiver \[age 21 or older\] with whom the patient discuss or who can be helpful in health-related matters;" patients who cannot identify such a person ("caregiver") can be eligible for the study. A caregiver need not be someone who lives with the patient or provides direct hands-on care. A caregiver can be any person who provides support (in any way) to the patient
2. Able to provide informed consent
3. English-speaking

Oncologists

1. A practicing oncologist
2. At least one of their patients are recruited to the study
3. English-speaking
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kah Poh Loh

Associate Professor - Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology (SMD)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kah Poh Loh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

DuMontier C, Loh KP, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Dale W. Decision Making in Older Adults With Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;39(19):2164-2174. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00165. Epub 2021 May 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34043434 (View on PubMed)

Loh KP, Abdallah M, Kadambi S, Wells M, Kumar AJ, Mendler JH, Liesveld JL, Wittink M, O'Dwyer K, Becker MW, McHugh C, Stock W, Majhail NS, Wildes TM, Duberstein P, Mohile SG, Klepin HD. Treatment decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia: a qualitative study of older adults and community oncologists. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Feb;62(2):387-398. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1832662. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33040623 (View on PubMed)

Jensen-Battaglia M, LoCastro M, Oh H, Sanapala C, Flannery M, Mendler JH, Liesveld J, Huselton E, Loh KP. Patient-oncologist discussion of treatment decisions: Exploring the role of a patient-centered communication tool for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and their caregivers. J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101716. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101716. Epub 2024 Feb 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38336521 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UOCPC22010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Quality of Life Model for Older Patients With AML
NCT04380441 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING