Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Bmab 1200 and Stelara in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (NCT NCT05335356)

NCT ID: NCT05335356

Last Updated: 2025-09-12

Results Overview

Percentage change from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score at Week 12

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

384 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to Week 12

Results posted on

2025-09-12

Participant Flow

The study was conducted in Europe and North America and enrolled patients across 41 sites in 5 countries.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Bmab1200
Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive Bmab 1200 or Stelara based on predefined stratification factors of geographic region (US vs Europe), body weight (≤100 kg vs \>100 kg), previous exposure to biologic-based therapies (Yes vs No), and concomitant psoriatic arthritis (Yes vs No). Patients received study treatment at the baseline visit and Week 4. Patients weighing ≤100 kg received a subcutaneous dose of 45 mg of either drug at each of the above visits, while patients weighing \>100 kg received a subcutaneous dose of 90 mg (45 mg × 2).
Stelara
Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive Bmab 1200 or Stelara based on predefined stratification factors of geographic region (US vs Europe), body weight (≤100 kg vs \>100 kg), previous exposure to biologic-based therapies (Yes vs No), and concomitant psoriatic arthritis (Yes vs No). Patients received study treatment at the baseline visit and Week 4. Patients weighing ≤100 kg received a subcutaneous dose of 45 mg of either drug at each of the above visits, while patients weighing \>100 kg received a subcutaneous dose of 90 mg (45 mg × 2).
Bmab 1200- Bmab 1200
Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200. This was done to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Stelara. All continuing patients who received study treatment with Bmab 1200 at the baseline visit and Week 4 and achieved at least PASI 50 response by Week 12 were rerandomized before receiving study treatment at Week 16. This was done to maintain the study blinding, i.e. the patients in the original Bmab 1200 group went through the rerandomization procedure; however, they were assigned and continued to receive Bmab 1200.
Stelara-Stelara
Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200. This was done to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Stelara. All continuing patients who received study treatment with Bmab 1200 at the baseline visit and Week 4 and achieved at least PASI 50 response by Week 12 were rerandomized before receiving study treatment at Week 16. This was done to maintain the study blinding, i.e. the patients in the original Bmab 1200 group went through the rerandomization procedure; however, they were assigned and continued to receive Bmab 1200.
Stelara-Bmab 1200
Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200. This was done to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Stelara. All continuing patients who received study treatment with Bmab 1200 at the baseline visit and Week 4 and achieved at least PASI 50 response by Week 12 were rerandomized before receiving study treatment at Week 16. This was done to maintain the study blinding, i.e. the patients in the original Bmab 1200 group went through the rerandomization procedure; however, they were assigned and continued to receive Bmab 1200.
Bmab 1200/Bmab 1200
All continuing patients who completed TP2 (received study treatment at the baseline visit and Weeks 4 and 16) and achieved at least PASI 75 response at Week 28 were offered to enter TP3 of the study to continue the same treatment that they were rerandomized to receive during TP2 (Bmab 1200 or Stelara) in a blinded manner. For patients not eligible to enter TP3, the end of study (EOS) visit occurred at Week 28.
Stelara/Stelara
All continuing patients who completed TP2 (received study treatment at the baseline visit and Weeks 4 and 16) and achieved at least PASI 75 response at Week 28 were offered to enter TP3 of the study to continue the same treatment that they were rerandomized to receive during TP2 (Bmab 1200 or Stelara) in a blinded manner. For patients not eligible to enter TP3, the end of study (EOS) visit occurred at Week 28.
Stelara/Bmab 1200
All continuing patients who completed TP2 (received study treatment at the baseline visit and Weeks 4 and 16) and achieved at least PASI 75 response at Week 28 were offered to enter TP3 of the study to continue the same treatment that they were rerandomized to receive during TP2 (Bmab 1200 or Stelara) in a blinded manner. For patients not eligible to enter TP3, the end of study (EOS) visit occurred at Week 28.
Treatment Period 1 (Baseline to Week 16)
STARTED
191
193
0
0
0
0
0
0
Treatment Period 1 (Baseline to Week 16)
COMPLETED
190
192
0
0
0
0
0
0
Treatment Period 1 (Baseline to Week 16)
NOT COMPLETED
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Treatment Period 2 (Week 16 to Week 28)
STARTED
0
0
185
94
92
0
0
0
Treatment Period 2 (Week 16 to Week 28)
COMPLETED
0
0
171
87
86
0
0
0
Treatment Period 2 (Week 16 to Week 28)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
14
7
6
0
0
0
Treatment Period 3 (Week 28 to Week 52)
STARTED
0
0
0
0
0
168
81
84
Treatment Period 3 (Week 28 to Week 52)
COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
163
79
82
Treatment Period 3 (Week 28 to Week 52)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Bmab 1200 and Stelara in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=193 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Total
n=384 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09 • n=93 Participants
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58 • n=4 Participants
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
n=93 Participants
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
127 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
121 Participants
n=93 Participants
136 Participants
n=4 Participants
257 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
6 Subject
n=93 Participants
6 Subject
n=4 Participants
12 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
185 Subject
n=93 Participants
187 Subject
n=4 Participants
372 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Subject
n=93 Participants
0 Subject
n=4 Participants
0 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Subject
n=93 Participants
0 Subject
n=4 Participants
0 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Subject
n=93 Participants
1 Subject
n=4 Participants
2 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Subject
n=93 Participants
0 Subject
n=4 Participants
0 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
190 Subject
n=93 Participants
192 Subject
n=4 Participants
382 Subject
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Subject
n=93 Participants
0 Subject
n=4 Participants
0 Subject
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
189 Subject
n=93 Participants
189 Subject
n=4 Participants
378 Subject
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Subject
n=93 Participants
4 Subject
n=4 Participants
6 Subject
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set

Percentage change from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score at Week 12

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=193 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)
-79.87 Percentage change from baseline
Standard Error 2.818
-80.55 Percentage change from baseline
Standard Error 2.783

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Percentage change from baseline in the PASI score at Baseline through Week 28. PASI is a quantitative rating score for measuring the severity of psoriatic lesions based on area coverage, plaque appearance, their response to therapy. 4 regions- head, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs are assessed separately for erythema, induration/thickness, and scaling. Degree of involvement is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement) for each region. Total score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each body region and then multiplied by constant. Sum of all lesion scores can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease), with the higher score indicating more severe disease. Change from baseline in PASI score indicates response to therapy. PASI 50 means ≥50% reduction from baseline in the PASI score

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=168 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=81 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
PASI Score
-95.50 Percentage change from Baseline in Score
Standard Deviation 6.068
-96.01 Percentage change from Baseline in Score
Standard Deviation 6.461
-95.44 Percentage change from Baseline in Score
Standard Deviation 7.321

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

PASI improvement of ≥50% relative to baseline (PASI 50), PASI improvement of ≥75% relative to baseline (PASI 75), and PASI improvement of ≥90% relative to Baseline through Week 28 and 52 PASI is a quantitative rating score for measuring the severity of psoriatic lesions based on area coverage, plaque appearance, their response to therapy. 4 regions- head, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs are assessed separately for erythema, induration/thickness, and scaling. Degree of involvement is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement) for each region. Total score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each body region and then multiplied by constant. Sum of all lesion scores can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease), with the higher score indicating more severe disease. Change from baseline in PASI score indicates response to therapy. PASI 50 means ≥50% reduction from baseline in the PASI score

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=168 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=80 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
PASI Improvement
PASI 50
168 Participants
80 Participants
84 Participants
PASI Improvement
PASI 75
168 Participants
79 Participants
83 Participants
PASI Improvement
PASI 90
140 Participants
70 Participants
67 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Population: sPGA-(averaged over all lesions); Score range: 0-5 Induration (I): 0 (no plaque-elevation) to 5 (severe plaque-elevation); Erythema (E): 0 (no erythema, hyperpigmentation maybe present) to 5 (dusky to deep-red coloration); Scaling (S): 0 (no scaling) to 5 (severe-very thick tenacious scale) sPGA based on Total-Average (I+E+S= /3): 0 (Cleared, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (Severe, majority of lesions have individual scores for I+E+S/3 that averages 5) Refer Apndx3-Protocol V3.0

Change from Baseline in sPGA During TP2. The sPGA is a quantitative rating score of the patient's psoriasis based on physician's assessment at a given time point according to the following categories: induration, erythema, and scaling. The sPGA is a 6-point scale and patient's psoriasis is graded as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), marked (4), severe (5). The sum of the scores for induration, erythema, and scaling will be divided by 3 to obtain a final sPGA score. lower score indicates better disease status

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=168 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=81 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA)
-3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
-2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
-2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Change from baseline in affected body surface area at Weeks 28 Total % BSA afflicted by psoriasis is estimated using a handprint of the patient at each visit . The entire palmar surface of the patient's handprint is assumed to correspond to approximately 1% of total BSA. Reduction in BSA indicates improvement

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=168 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=81 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Affected Body Surface Area
-26.52 Percentage of total body surface area
Standard Deviation 15.152
-25.91 Percentage of total body surface area
Standard Deviation 13.323
-28.33 Percentage of total body surface area
Standard Deviation 17.251

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Change from baseline in quality of life as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index scores at Weeks 28 It is a 10-item patient-reported outcome questionnaire that, in addition to evaluating overall QoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect QoL: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Nine of the 10 questions have response categories including "not relevant" (score of 0), "not at all" (score of 0), "a little" (score of 1), "a lot" (score of 2) and "very much" (score of 3); Question 7 is a "yes"/ "no" question where "yes" is scored as 3. Eight items also have a "Not relevant" option scored "0," which indicates no problems. Total scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment) and a 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=170 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=90 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=88 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores
-12.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.84
-10.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
-12.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

Change from baseline in quality of life as measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index scores at Weeks 52 It is a 10-item patient-reported outcome questionnaire that, in addition to evaluating overall QoL, can be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect QoL: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Nine of the 10 questions have response categories including "not relevant" (score of 0), "not at all" (score of 0), "a little" (score of 1), "a lot" (score of 2) and "very much" (score of 3); Question 7 is a "yes"/ "no" question where "yes" is scored as 3. Eight items also have a "Not relevant" option scored "0," which indicates no problems. Total scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment) and a 5-point change from baseline is considered a clinically important difference.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=152 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=79 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=79 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Dermatology Life Quality Index Scores
-12.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.73
-11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.35
-12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

Population: sPGA-(averaged over all lesions); Score range: 0-5 Induration (I): 0 (no plaque-elevation) to 5 (severe plaque-elevation); Erythema (E): 0 (no erythema, hyperpigmentation maybe present) to 5 (dusky to deep-red coloration); Scaling (S): 0 (no scaling) to 5 (severe-very thick tenacious scale) sPGA based on Total-Average (I+E+S= /3): 0 (Cleared, except for residual discoloration) to 5 (Severe, majority of lesions have individual scores for I+E+S/3 that averages 5) Refer Apndx3-Protocol V3.0

Change in Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) at Weeks 52 The sPGA is a quantitative rating score of the patient's psoriasis based on physician's assessment at a given time point according to the following categories: induration, erythema, and scaling. The sPGA is a 6-point scale and patient's psoriasis is graded as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), marked (4), severe (5). The sum of the scores for induration, erythema, and scaling will be divided by 3 to obtain a final sPGA score. lower score indicates better disease status

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=163 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=80 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=82 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA)
-3.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
-3.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
-2.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

Change from baseline in affected body surface area at Weeks 52 Total % BSA afflicted by psoriasis is estimated using a handprint of the patient at each visit . The entire palmar surface of the patient's handprint is assumed to correspond to approximately 1% of total BSA. Reduction in BSA indicates improvement

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=163 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=80 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=83 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Affected Body Surface Area
-27.42 Change from Baseline in %BSA
Standard Deviation 15.119
-26.50 Change from Baseline in %BSA
Standard Deviation 13.160
-28.90 Change from Baseline in %BSA
Standard Deviation 17.560

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through week 52

PASI improvement of ≥50% relative to baseline (PASI 50), PASI improvement of ≥75% relative to baseline (PASI 75), and PASI improvement of ≥90% relative to Week 52

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=163 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=80 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=83 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
PASI Improvement
PASI 50
163 Participants
80 Participants
83 Participants
PASI Improvement
PASI 75
159 Participants
80 Participants
81 Participants
PASI Improvement
PASI 90
133 Participants
70 Participants
63 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

Percentage change from baseline in the PASI score at Baseline through Week 52. The PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) is a score from 0 to 72 that measures psoriasis severity based on lesion redness, thickness, scaling, and body area affected. The body is divided into four regions, each scored separately. Scores are calculated using severity and area involvement, and are used to assess treatment response (e.g., PASI 50 = 50% improvement).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=163 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=81 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
PASI Score
-95.50 Percentage change from Baseline
Standard Deviation 7.507
-96.60 Percentage change from Baseline
Standard Deviation 5.671
-94.71 Percentage change from Baseline
Standard Deviation 7.950

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=101 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=92 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Endometrial adenocarcinoma
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Angioedema
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Rash maculo-papular
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Abdominal pain
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Jaundice cholestatic
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Safety:-Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Including Adverse Events of Special Interest and Adverse Reactions During the Treatment Period
Alcohol poisoning
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28 and 52

Population: NAb status with no injection site reactions being reported.

Injection-site reactions at Day 1, Week 4, Week 16, and throughout the study

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

Hypersensitivity at Day 1, Week 4, Week 16, and throughout the study

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=101 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=92 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Safety:- Hypersensitivity
1 participants
3 participants
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Population: n = number of patients with available data

Proportion of patients developing antidrug antibodies

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=185 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=94 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=92 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
ADA positive
162 participants
88 participants
86 participants
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
ADA negative
21 participants
6 participants
5 participants
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
Patients with no post baseline ADA result
2 participants
0 participants
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Postdosing Week 52

Population: n = number of patients with available data

Proportion of patients developing antidrug antibodies

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=168 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=81 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=84 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
ADA positive
131 participants
73 participants
74 participants
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
ADA negative
36 participants
8 participants
10 participants
Immunogenicity:-Developing Antidrug Antibodies
Patients with no post baseline ADA result
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline through Week 28

Population: n = number of patients with available data

Proportion of patients neutralizing antibodies

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=162 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=88 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=86 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Developing Neutralizing Antibodies
Nab reactive
54 participants
42 participants
31 participants
Developing Neutralizing Antibodies
Nab negative
108 participants
46 participants
55 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Postdosing Week 52

Population: n = number of patients with available data

Proportion of patients neutralizing antibodies

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=131 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=73 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=74 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Developing Neutralizing Antibodies
Nab reactive
27 participants
19 participants
12 participants
Developing Neutralizing Antibodies
Nab negative
104 participants
54 participants
62 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Postdosing on Week 28

Serum concentrations of ustekinumab

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=130 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=61 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=61 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
n=36 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
n=15 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
n=20 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Pharmacokinetic:-Serum Concentrations
678.308 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 444.7791
589.780 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 418.9308
620.793 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 398.1352
796.833 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 392.6448
1070.600 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 522.0039
861.665 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 549.4014

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Postdosing on Week 52

Serum concentrations of Ustekinumab

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bmab1200
n=127 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=60 Participants
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab 1200
n=61 Participants
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Bmab 1200 (2 Injection)
n=35 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Stelara (2 Injection)
n=17 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Stelara-Bmab 1200 ((2 Injection)
n=20 Participants
Patients who weigh \>100 kg: Stelara® 90 mg (2 injections of 45 mg PFS)
Pharmacokinetic:-Serum Concentrations
728.029 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 477.1775
665.403 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 379.9506
653.908 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 415.8309
881.343 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 510.0086
1008.382 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 671.8667
898.450 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 551.4494

Adverse Events

Bmab1200

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 111 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Stelara

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 48 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Stelara-Bmab1200

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 51 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 participants at risk
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=101 participants at risk
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab1200
n=92 participants at risk
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial adenocarcinoma
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice cholestatic
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterovaginal prolapse
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Bmab1200
n=191 participants at risk
Bmab 1200 45 mg Bmab 1200 90 mg Bmab1200: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40
Stelara
n=101 participants at risk
Stelara 45 mg Stelara 90 mg Stelara: 45 mg , 90 mg at Week 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40; Before dosing at Week 16, patients in the Stelara group were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1200 or Stelara
Stelara-Bmab1200
n=92 participants at risk
Bmab 1200 45 mg 90 mg Stelara 45 mg 90 mg Subject who received Stelara 45 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 45 mg Subject who received Stelara 90 mg dose have received Bmab 1200 dose 90 mg
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
9.4%
18/191 • Number of events 23 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
8.7%
8/92 • Number of events 8 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Influenza
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 8 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
5.4%
5/92 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
3.1%
6/191 • Number of events 7 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
6.5%
6/92 • Number of events 7 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
3.1%
6/191 • Number of events 6 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.3%
3/92 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.3%
3/92 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.3%
3/92 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Vaginal infection
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis bacterial
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Asymptomatic bacteriuria
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal viral infection
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Giardiasis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Onychomycosis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Peritonsillar abscess
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis bacterial
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Tongue fungal infection
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Urethritis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection fungal
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
6.3%
12/191 • Number of events 14 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 9 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
5.8%
11/191 • Number of events 13 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.3%
3/92 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
3.7%
7/191 • Number of events 7 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
3.1%
6/191 • Number of events 7 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 6 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Weight increased
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Lipids increased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Weight decreased
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood glucose abnormal
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Blood phosphorus decreased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Glucose urine present
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Haemoglobin increased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
High density lipoprotein decreased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Monocyte count increased
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
Transaminases increased
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
3.1%
6/191 • Number of events 8 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
2.6%
5/191 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acquired mixed hyperlipidaemia
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose tolerance impaired
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic syndrome
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Erythropenia
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Secondary thrombocytosis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
2.1%
4/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.3%
3/92 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Ketonuria
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Glycosuria
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Hyperoxaluria
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rosacea
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sensitive skin
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Psoriatic arthropathy
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint contracture
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal pain
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
2.2%
2/92 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bone contusion
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured coccyx
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic neck syndrome
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic pain
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Bundle branch block right
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac discomfort
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Left atrial enlargement
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve incompetence
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatomegaly
1.0%
2/191 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic steatosis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice cholestatic
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety disorder
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Psychiatric disorders
Illness anxiety disorder
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Genital haemorrhage
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Heavy menstrual bleeding
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruation irregular
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterovaginal prolapse
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
1.6%
3/191 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Vascular disorders
Essential hypertension
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
General disorders
Chest discomfort
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
General disorders
Face oedema
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial adenocarcinoma
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Meningioma
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Eye disorders
Cataract
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Eye disorders
Eyelid oedema
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hypoacusis
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tympanic membrane perforation
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Atrial septal defect
0.52%
1/191 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/92 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/191 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)
1.1%
1/92 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) through the Study (Week 52)

Additional Information

Dr Sarika D

Biocon Biologics Limited

Phone: 080 2808

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Data are the property of the Sponsor and cannot be published without prior authorization from the Sponsor, but data and publication thereof will not be unduly withheld.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER