Cyclosporine 0.1% / Loteprednol 0.2% Effect on Anterior Segment Normalization

NCT ID: NCT05322148

Last Updated: 2023-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-03

Study Completion Date

2022-11-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The CLEAN Study: Cyclosporine 0.1% / Loteprednol 0.2% Effect on Anterior Segment Normalization-A Prospective Cohort Study of Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Dry Eye

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty million people in the US are thought to suffer from dry eye. Patients with this condition manifest with ocular surface disruption such as corneal fluorescein staining and reduced tear breakup time (TBUT). Successful treatment is a high priority for both patients and physicians, reducing symptoms and improving visual acuity and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), which have been closely linked with treatment satisfaction. A number of studies have shown the benefit of both cyclosporine and steroids in managing dry eye. However, existing formulations of these products are challenged by either limited tolerability, a high out-of-pocket cost or both. Combination therapy with these agents in an advanced, more tolerable formulation have the potential to improve both tolerability and cost. However, the available formulation of preservative free Klarity CL (cyclosporine 0.1% and loteprednol 0.2% in a chondroitin sulfate vehicle) has not been studied rigorously.

This study is designed to demonstrate that Klarity CL can benefit the ocular surface with high tolerability, making it a very desirable method of treating patients with dry eye.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, open label study of the efficacy of cyclosporine 0.1% / loteprednol 0.2% in improving higher order aberrations, and TBUT in patients with dry eye. Patients will be randomized to receive treatment with either cyclosporine 0.1% / loteprednol 0.2% BID for 4 weeks or cyclosporine 0.05% BID for 4 weeks and will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment), 14 days, and 28 days of treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cyclosporine 0.1% / loteprednol 0.2% group

60 total patients will be randomized in a 2 to 1 proportion with 40 in the cyclosporine 0.1% / loteprednol 0.2% group and 20 in the cyclosporine 0.05% group. All patients will undergo treatment in both eyes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Klarity CL, Cylcosporine 0.1%/Loteprednol Etabonate 0.2% Preservative Free

Intervention Type DRUG

A number of studies have shown the benefit of both cyclosporine and steroids in managing dry eye. However, existing formulations of these products are challenged by either limited tolerability, a high out-of-pocket cost or both. Combination therapy with these agents in an advanced, more tolerable formulation have the potential to improve both tolerability and cost. However, the available formulation of preservative free Klarity CL (cyclosporine 0.1% and loteprednol 0.2% in a chondroitin sulfate vehicle) has not been studied rigorously.

cyclosporine 0.05% group

60 total patients will be randomized in a 2 to 1 proportion with 40 in the cyclosporine 0.1% / loteprednol 0.2% group and 20 in the cyclosporine 0.05% group. All patients will undergo treatment in both eyes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Klarity CL, Cylcosporine 0.1%/Loteprednol Etabonate 0.2% Preservative Free

Intervention Type DRUG

A number of studies have shown the benefit of both cyclosporine and steroids in managing dry eye. However, existing formulations of these products are challenged by either limited tolerability, a high out-of-pocket cost or both. Combination therapy with these agents in an advanced, more tolerable formulation have the potential to improve both tolerability and cost. However, the available formulation of preservative free Klarity CL (cyclosporine 0.1% and loteprednol 0.2% in a chondroitin sulfate vehicle) has not been studied rigorously.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Klarity CL, Cylcosporine 0.1%/Loteprednol Etabonate 0.2% Preservative Free

A number of studies have shown the benefit of both cyclosporine and steroids in managing dry eye. However, existing formulations of these products are challenged by either limited tolerability, a high out-of-pocket cost or both. Combination therapy with these agents in an advanced, more tolerable formulation have the potential to improve both tolerability and cost. However, the available formulation of preservative free Klarity CL (cyclosporine 0.1% and loteprednol 0.2% in a chondroitin sulfate vehicle) has not been studied rigorously.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over age 18 with the following signs:

i. Central or inferior corneal fluorescein staining defined by the Oxford Scale ii. Reduced tear break up time (TBUT) ≤ 10 seconds.
* Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent.
* Patients willing to take an electronic survey about their tolerability of either study medication.
* Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits.

Exclusion Criteria

* Ocular surgery (e.g., intraocular, oculoplastic, corneal or refractive surgical procedure) performed within the last 3 months or at any time that in the investigator's clinical judgment if it would interfere with the outcome measures of this study.
* Clinically significant ocular trauma.
* Active ocular Herpes simplex or Herpes Zoster infection
* Ocular inflammation (uveitis, iritis, scleritis, episcleritis, keratitis, conjunctivitis) at the discretion of the investigator.
* Ocular infection (e.g., viral, bacterial, mycobacterial, protozoan or fungal infection or the cornea, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, lacrimal sac or eyelids including hordeolum/stye).
* Active, systemic or local disease condition that causes clinically significant ocular surface irritation such that it could interfere with the study findings.
* Moderate to severe (Grade 2-4) allergic, vernal or giant papillary conjunctivitis.
* Severe (Grade 3 or 4) inflammation of the eyelid (e.g., blepharochalasis, staphylococcal blepharitis or seborrheic blepharitis)
* Eyelid abnormalities that significantly affect the lid function (e.g., entropion, ectropion, tumor, edema, blepharospasm, lagophthalmos, severe trichiasis, severe ptosis).
* Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise the corneal integrity (e.g., prior chemical burn, recurrent corneal erosion, corneal epithelial defect, Grade 3 corneal fluorescein staining, map dot fingerprint dystrophy, or the effect of any other ophthalmic medication that might in the opinion of the investigator compromise the ocular surface integrity).
* Participation in this trial in the same patient's fellow eye
* Patients who are under age 18, pregnant or breastfeeding, or who may become pregnant during participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Research Insight LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Hovanesian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Harvard Eye Associates

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inland Eye Specialists

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Harvard Eye Associates

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Eye Clinic

Brecksville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010 CLEAN Klarity CL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.